Advancements in all-ceramics for dental restorations and their effect on the wear of opposing dentition

ABSTRACT

Tooth wear is a process that is usually a result of tooth to tooth and/or tooth and restoration contact. The process of wear essentially becomes accelerated by the introduction of restorations inside the oral cavity, especially in case of opposing ceramic restorations. The newest materials have vastly contributed toward the interest in esthetic dental restorations and have been extensively studied in laboratories. However, despite the recent technological advancements, there has not been a valid in vivo method of evaluation involving clinical wear caused due to ceramics upon restored teeth and natural dentition. The aim of this paper is to review the latest advancements in all-ceramic materials, and their effect on the wear of opposing dentition. The descriptive review has been written after a thorough MEDLINE/PubMed search by the authors. It is imperative that clinicians are aware of recent advancements and that they should always consider the type of ceramic restorative materials used to maintain a stable occlusal relation. The ceramic restorations should be adequately finished and polished after the chair-side adjustment process of occlusal surfaces.

Key words:

All-ceramic materials - all-ceramic restorations - surface roughness - tooth wear

• REFERENCES

• 1 Sulong MZ, Aziz RA. Wear of materials used in dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1990; 63: 342-9
• 2 Shellis RP, Addy M. The interactions between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci 2014; 25: 32-45
• 3 Wiley MG. Effects of porcelain on occluding surfaces of restored teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 133-7
• 4 Bani D, Bani T, Bergamini M. Morphologic and biochemical changes of the masseter muscles induced by occlusal wear: Studies in a rat model. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 1735-44
• 5 Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 451-9
• 6 Ohlmann B, Trame JP, Dreyhaupt J, Gabbert O, Koob A, Rammelsberg P. Wear of posterior metal-free polymer crowns after 2 years. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 782-8
• 7 Levrini L, Di Benedetto G, Raspanti M. Dental wear: A scanning electron microscope study. Biomed Res Int 2014; 2014: 340425
• 8 Hanif A, Rashid H, Nasim M. Tooth surface loss revisited: Classification, etiology and management. J Res Dent 2015; 3: 37-43
• 9 Huysmans MC, Chew HP, Ellwood RP. Clinical studies of dental erosion and erosive wear. Caries Res 2011; 45 (Suppl. 01) 60-8
• 10 Kitasako Y, Sasaki Y, Takagaki T, Sadr A, Tagami J. Age-specific prevalence of erosive tooth wear by acidic diet and gastroesophageal reflux in Japan. J Dent 2015; 43: 418-23
• 11 Richter S, Eliasson ST. Enamel erosion and mechanical tooth wear in medieval Icelanders. Acta Odontol Scand 2016; 74: 186-93
• 12 Etman MK, Woolford M, Dunne S. Quantitative measurement of tooth and ceramic wear: in vivo study. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 245-52
• 13 Park S, Quinn JB, Romberg E, Arola D. On the brittleness of enamel and selected dental materials. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 1477-85
• 14 Rashid H. Evaluation of the surface roughness of a standard abraded dental porcelain following different polishing techniques. J Dent Sci 2012; 7: 184-98
• 15 Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelains. J Prosthodont 2003; 13: 168-75
• 16 Passos SP, de Freitas AP, Iorgovan G, Rizkalla AS, Santos MJ, Santos JúniorGC. Enamel wear opposing different surface conditions of different CAD/CAM ceramics. Quintessence Int 2013; 44: 743-51
• 17 Mahalick JA, Knap FJ, Weiter EJ. Occlusal wear in prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc 1971; 82: 154-9
• 18 Pilathadka S, Vahalova D. Contemporary all-ceramic materials, part-1. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove) 2007; 50: 101-4
• 19 Datla SR, Alla RK, Alluri VR, Babu J, Konakanchi A. Dental ceramics: Part II – Recent advances in dental ceramics. Am J Mater Eng Technolog 2015; 3: 19-26
• 20 Rashid H. Comparing glazed and polished ceramic surfaces using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Adv Microsc Res 2012; 7: 1-6
• 21 Denry IL, Rosenstiel SF. Phase transformations in feldspathic dental porcelains. In: Fischman G, Clare A, Hench L. editors. Bioceramics: Materials and Applications. Westerville: The American Ceramic Society; 1995: p. 149-56
• 22 Guess PC, Schultheis S, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Ferencz JL, Silva NR. All-ceramic systems: Laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am 2011; 55: 333-52
• 23 Fons-Font A, Solá-Ruíz MF, Granell-Ruíz M, Labaig-Rueda C, Martínez-González A. Choice of ceramic for use in treatments with porcelain laminate veneers. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2006; 11: E297-302
• 24 Kelly JR, Benetti P. Ceramic materials in dentistry: Historical evolution and current practice. Aust Dent J 2011; 56 (Suppl. 01) 84-96
• 25 Atala MH, Gul EB. How to strengthen dental ceramics. Int J Dent Sci Res 2015; 3: 24-27
• 26 Van Noort R. Introduction to Dental Materials. Spain: Mosby; 1994: p. 201-14
• 27 O'Brien WJ. Magnesia ceramic jacket crowns. Dent Clin North Am 1985; 29: 719-23
• 28 O'Brien WJ, Groh CL, Boenke KM, Mora GP, Tien TY. The strengthening mechanism of a magnesia core ceramic. Dent Mater 1993; 9: 242-5
• 29 Sadaqah NR. Ceramic laminate veneers: Materials advances and selection. Open J Stomatol 2014; 4: 268-79
• 30 Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Reitz B. Zirconia-TZP and alumina – Advanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1999; 7: 113-9
• 31 Raut A, Rao PL, Ravindranath T. Zirconium for esthetic rehabilitation: An overview. Indian J Dent Res 2011; 22: 140-3
• 32 Aboushelib MN, Kleverlaan CJ, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part 3: Double veneer technique. J Prosthodont 2008; 17: 9-13
• 33 Deany IL. Recent advances in ceramics for dentistry. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996; 7: 134-43
• 34 Shenoy A, Shenoy N. Dental ceramics: An update. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13: 195-203
• 35 Sukumaran VG, Bharadwaj N. Ceramics in dental applications, trends biomater. Artif Organs 2006; 20: 7-11
• 36 Denry IL, Mackert Jr. JR, Holloway JA, Rosenstiel SF. Effect of cubic leucite stabilization on the flexural strength of feldspathic dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1928-35
• 37 Mackert Jr. JR, Williams AL. Microcracks in dental porcelain and their behavior during multiple firing. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1484-90
• 38 Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Schärer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: Technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992; 5: 9-16
• 39 Höland W, Apel E, van't Hoen C, Rheinberger V. Studies of crystal phase formations in highstrength lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. J Non Cryst Solids 2006; 352: 4041-50
• 40 Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Influence of hot pressing on the microstructure and fracture toughness of two pressable dental glass-ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004; 71: 99-107
• 41 Fairhurst CW. Dental ceramics: The state of the science. Adv Dent Res 1992; 6: 78-81
• 42 Taskonak B, Anusavice KJ, Mecholsky Jr JJ. Role of investment interaction layer on strength and toughness of ceramic laminates. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 701-8
• 43 Mörmann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006; 137: 7S-13S
• 44 Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: Current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 44-56
• 45 Chaiyabutr Y, Kois JC, Lebeau D, Nunokawa G. Effect of abutment tooth color, cement color, and ceramic thickness on the resulting optical color of a CAD/CAM glass-ceramic lithium disilicate-reinforced crown. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105: 83-90
• 46 Alghazzawi TF, Lemons J, Liu PR, Essig ME, Janowski GM. Evaluation of the optical properties of CAD-CAM generated yttria-stabilized zirconia and glass-ceramic laminate veneers. J Prosthet Dent 2012; 107: 300-8
• 47 Shammas M, Alla RK. Color and shade matching in dentistry, trends biomater. Artif Organs 2011; 25: 172-5
• 48 Burwell J. Survey of possible wear mechanisms. Wear 1957; 1: 119-41
• 49 Hmaidouch R, Weigl P. Tooth wear against ceramic crowns in posterior region: A systematic literature review. Int J Oral Sci 2013; 5: 183-90
• 50 Rashid H. The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: A review of literature. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 571-9
• 51 Jagger DC, Harrison A. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of unglazed, glazed, and polished porcelain on human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 320-3
• 52 Harrison A, Lewis TT. The development of an abrasion testing machine for dental materials. J Biomed Mater Res 1975; 9: 341-53
• 53 Derand P, Vereby P. Wear of low-fusing dental porcelains. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 460-3
• 54 Metzler KT, Woody RD, Miller 3^rd AW, Miller BH. In vitro investigation of the wear of human enamel by dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 356-64
• 55 Clelland NL, Agarwala V, Knobloch LA, Seghi RR. Relative wear of enamel opposing low-fusing dental porcelain. J Prosthodont 2003; 12: 168-75
• 56 Cheung KC, Darvell BW. Sintering of dental porcelain: Effect of time and temperature on appearance and porosity. Dent Mater 2002; 18: 163-73
• 57 DeLong R, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL, Pintado MR. The wear of dental porcelain in an artificial mouth. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 214-9
• 58 Kelly JR, Campbell SD, Bowen HK. Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 536-41
• 59 Rasmussen ST, Ngaji-Okumu W, Boenke K, O'Brien WJ. Optimum particle size distribution for reduced sintering shrinkage of a dental porcelain. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 43-50
• 60 Anusavice KJ, Lee RB. Effect of firing temperature and water exposure on crack propagation in unglazed porcelain. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 1075-81
• 61 Piddock V. Effect of alumina concentration on the thermal diffusivity of dental porcelain. J Dent 1989; 17: 290-4
• 62 Monasky GE, Taylor DF. Studies on the wear of porcelain, enamel, and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1971; 25: 299-306
• 63 Wang L, D'Alpino PH, Lopes LG, Pereira JC. Mechanical properties of dental restorative materials: Relative contribution of laboratory tests. J Appl Oral Sci 2003; 11: 162-7
• 64 Imai Y, Suzuki S, Fukushima S. Enamel wear of modified porcelains. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 315-23
• 65 Schuh C, Kinast EJ, Mezzomo E, Kapczinski MP. Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 245-52
• 66 Podshadley AG, Harrison JD. Rat connective tissue response to pontic materials. J Prosthet Dent 1966; 16: 110-8
• 67 Al-Wahadni AM, Martin DM. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of glazed, unglazed and refinished dental porcelain on an opposing material. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 538-46
• 68 Jacobi R, Shillingburg Jr. HT, Duncanson Jr MG. A comparison of the abrasiveness of six ceramic surfaces and gold. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 303-9
• 69 Pascal M, Belser U. Bonded Porcelain Restorations in the Anterior Dentition. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing; 2002: 2003
• 70 Al-Hiyasat AS, Saunders WP, Smith GM. Three-body wear associated with three ceramics and enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 476-81
• 71 Patterson CJ, McLundie AC, Stirrups DR, Taylor WG. Polishing of porcelain by using a refinishing kit. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 383-8
• 72 Wright MD, Masri R, Driscoll CF, Romberg E, Thompson GA, Runyan DA. Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 92: 486-90