Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2016; 10(03): 321-326
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.184155
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Evaluation of the effect of denture adhesives on surface roughness of two chemically different denture base resins

Mahmoud Darwish
1   Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
2   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
,
Mohammad Zakaria Nassani
1   Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, Al-Farabi Colleges, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
3   Department of Removable Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Aleppo, Aleppo, Syria
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 September 2019 (online)

  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: To evaluate the effect of four commercially available denture adhesives (DAs) on surface roughness of two chemically different denture base materials. Materials and Methods: Fifty specimens of heat-cured polymethyl methacrylate, and another fifty specimens of light-cured urethane dimethacrylate were divided into five groups (n = 10), each was immersed in four prepared DAs (Corega Super Cream, Corega Ultra Powder, Olivafix Cream, Protefix Cream) as well as distilled water (control group). The mean surface roughness (R a) of the polished and unpolished surfaces of the specimens was recorded using profilometer device. T-test for paired observation was used to indicate any changes in surface roughness between the baseline and after 30 days of immersion in the DA. Results: Almost all the tested DAs had no significant effect on the roughness of polished and unpolished surfaces of both denture base materials. The Corega super cream DA produced significant increase in the roughness of the polished surfaces of both types of acrylic specimens (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The majority of the investigated DAs appears not to affect the surface roughness of denture base materials. Only Corega super cream DA produced detectable increase in the roughness of polished surfaces of denture base specimens.

Key words:

Denture adhesives - denture base materials - surface roughness
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Coates AJ. Usage of denture adhesives. J Dent 2000; 28: 137-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Stafford GD, Russell C. Efficiency of denture adhesives and their possible influence on oral microorganisms. J Dent Res 1971; 50: 832-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Love WB, Biswas S. Denture adhesives – PH and buffering capacity. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 66: 356-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Benson D, Rothman RS, Sims TN. The effect of a denture adhesive on the oral mucosa and vertical dimension of complete denture patients. J South Calif Dent Assoc 1972; 40: 468-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Rahal JS, Mesquita MF, Henriques GE, Nóbilo MA. Influence of chemical and mechanical polishing on water sorption and solubility of denture base acrylic resins. Braz Dent J 2004; 15: 225-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Combe EC, Owen BA, Hodges JS. A protocol for determining the surface free energy of dental materials. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 262-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sczepanski F, Sczepanski CR, Berger SB, Consani RL, Gonini-Júnior A, Guiraldo RD. Effect of sodium hypochlorite and peracetic acid on the surface roughness of acrylic resin polymerized by heated water for short and long cycles. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 533-7
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 da Silva WJ, Rached RN, Rosalen PL, Del bel Cury AA. Effects of nystatin, fluconazole and propolis on poly(methyl methacrylate) resin surface. Braz Dent J 2008; 19: 190-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Taylor R, Maryan C, Verran J. Retention of oral microorganisms on cobalt-chromium alloy and dental acrylic resin with different surface finishes. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 592-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Murray ID, McCabe JF, Storer R. Abrasivity of denture cleaning pastes in vitro and in situ . Br Dent J 1986; 161: 137-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Whitehead KA, Verran J. The effect of surface topography on the retention of microorganisms. Food Bioproducts Process 2006; 84: 253-9
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Allis TJ, Leopold DA. Smell and taste disorders. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2012; 20: 93-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Bettencourt AF, Neves CB, de Almeida MS, Pinheiro LM, Oliveira SA, Lopes LP. et al. Biodegradation of acrylic based resins: A review. Dent Mater 2010; 26: e171-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Duqum I, Powers KA, Cooper L, Felton D. Denture adhesive use in complete dentures: Clinical recommendations and review of the literature. Gen Dent 2012; 60: 467-77
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Machado C, Sanchez E, Azer SS, Uribe JM. Comparative study of the transverse strength of three denture base materials. J Dent 2007; 35: 930-3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rashid H, Sheikh Z, Vohra F. Allergic effects of the residual monomer used in denture base acrylic resins. Eur J Dent 2015; 9: 614-9
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Willershausen B, Callaway A, Ernst CP, Stender E. The influence of oral bacteria on the surfaces of resin-based dental restorative materials – An in vitro study. Int Dent J 1999; 49: 231-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Constantinescu IR, Ursache M, Mardarez D. Effect of pH on the surface roughness of heat cured denture base acrylic resins. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi 2007; 111: 477-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of Candida albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different surface topography. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 535-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Kuhar M, Funduk N. Effects of polishing techniques on the surface roughness of acrylic denture base resins. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 93: 76-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Tuncer D, Karaman E, Firat E. Does the temperature of beverages affect the surface roughness, hardness, and color stability of a composite resin?. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: 165-71
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 de Alencar E, Silva LeiteML, da Cunha MedeirosE, Silva FD, Meireles SS, Duarte RM, Andrade AK. The effect of drinks on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposites. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 330-6
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gadelmawla ES, Koura MM, Maksoud TM, Elewa IM, Soliman HH. Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol 2002; 123: 133-45
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Zhao K, Cheng XR, Chao YL, Li ZA, Han GL. Laboratory evaluation of a new denture adhesive. Dent Mater 2004; 20: 419-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Koda T, Tsuchiya H, Yamauchi M, Ohtani S, Takagi N, Kawano J. Leachability of denture-base acrylic resins in artificial saliva. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 13-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Jaeggi T, Grüninger A, Lussi A. Restorative therapy of erosion. Monogr Oral Sci 2006; 20: 200-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Miranda DdeA, Bertoldo CE, Aguiar FH, Lima DA, Lovadino JR. Effects of mouthwashes on Knoop hardness and surface roughness of dental composites after different immersion times. Braz Oral Res 2011; 25: 168-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 211-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Woodruff CW, Peck GE, Banker GS. Effect of environmental conditions and polymer ratio on water vapor transmission through free plasticized cellulose films. J Pharm Sci 1972; 61: 1956-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Uysal H, Altay OT, Alparslan N, Bilge A. Comparison of four different denture cushion adhesives – A subjective study. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 209-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Adisman IK. The use of denture adhesives as an aid to denture treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 711-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar