PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2016; 10(03): 361-365
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.184148
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Effects of staining and bleaching on a nanohybrid composite with or without surface sealant

Derya Merve Halacoglu
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkiye
,
Kıvanc Yamanel
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkiye
,
Saffet Basaran
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkiye
,
Duygu Tuncer
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkiye
,
Cigdem Celik
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Baskent University, Ankara, Turkiye
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
24. September 2019 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
  als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: The effect of different staining solutions and a bleaching procedure on color stability and surface roughness of a nanohybrid resin composite were evaluated with or without liquid resin polishing (RP). Materials and Methods: Ninety-six disc-shaped resin composite specimens (A1 Shade, Z550 Filtek 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA) were prepared and divided randomly into two groups (n = 48). Liquid RP (BisCover LV, Bisco Inc., Schaumburg, IL, USA) was applied in one group (RP) and not in the other (P). Specimen color and surface roughness were determined using a colorimeter and profilometer, respectively. After baseline measurements, each group was divided into four subgroups (n = 12) for immersion in a control (distilled water) or three different staining solutions (ice tea, red wine, and cola) for 1 week. Color and surface roughness were then reevaluated. After measurements, all specimens were bleached using a 35% hydrogen peroxide gel. The color and surface roughness of the specimens were reevaluated. Statistical Analysis: Data were subjected to an analysis of variance for repeated measurements among the groups (P < 0.05). Results: Staining and bleaching did not change the surface roughness of the RP and P groups (P > 0.05). Discoloration in the red wine group was higher than for the other staining solutions for the RP (P < 0.001) and P groups (P = 0.018). Conclusion: Application of liquid RP did not enhance the color stability and surface roughness of the composite resin restoration.

Key words:

Bleaching - nanohybrid composite - staining - surface roughness - surface sealant
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Senawongse P, Pongprueksa P. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007; 19: 265-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Dresch W, Volpato S, Gomes JC, Ribeiro NR, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Clinical evaluation of a nanofilled composite in posterior teeth: 12-month results. Oper Dent 2006; 31: 409-17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Mundim FM, Garcia LdaF, Pires-de-Souza FdeC. Effect of staining solutions and repolishing on color stability of direct composites. J Appl Oral Sci 2010; 18: 249-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Sarafianou A, Iosifidou S, Papadopoulos T, Eliades G. Color stability and degree of cure of direct composite restoratives after accelerated aging. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 406-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Premaraj TS, Rohani N, Covey D, Premaraj S, Hua Y, Watanabe H. An in vitro evaluation of mechanical and esthetic properties of orthodontic sealants. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 487-92
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Doray PG, Eldiwany MS, Powers JM. Effect of resin surface sealers on improvement of stain resistance for a composite provisional material. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15: 244-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Attar N. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 27-35
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Albanai SR, Gillam DG, Taylor PD. An overview on the effects of 10% and 15% Carbamide Peroxide and its Relationship to Dentine Sensitivity. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2015; 23: 50-5
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lefever D, Perakis N, Roig M, Krejci I, Ardu S. The effect of toothbrushing on surface gloss of resin composites. Am J Dent 2012; 25: 54-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nasim I, Neelakantan P, Sujeer R, Subbarao CV. Color stability of microfilled, microhybrid and nanocomposite resins – An in vitro study. J Dent 2010; 38 (Suppl. 02) e137-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Khosravanifard B, Rakhshan V, Araghi S, Parhiz H. Effect of ascorbic acid on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement to bleached teeth. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2012; 6: 59-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Farah RI, Elwi H. Spectrophotometric evaluation of color changes of bleach-shade resin-based composites after staining and bleaching. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15: 587-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Roselino LdeM, Chinelatti MA, Alandia-Román CC, Pires-de-Souza FdeC. Effect of brushing time and dentifrice abrasiveness on color change and surface roughness of resin composites. Braz Dent J 2015; 26: 507-13
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Aguiar FH, Santos AJ, Sad LO, Lovadino JR. Surface staining of three restorative materials by two disclosing agents. Rev Pós Graduação USP 2004; 11: 215-9
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Stober T, Gilde H, Lenz P. Color stability of highly filled composite resin materials for facings. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 87-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Guler AU, Yilmaz F, Kulunk T, Guler E, Kurt S. Effects of different drinks on stainability of resin composite provisional restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94: 118-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Kumari RV, Nagaraj H, Siddaraju K, Poluri RK. Evaluation of the effect of surface polishing, oral beverages and food colorants on color stability and surface roughness of nanocomposite resins. J Int Oral Health 2015; 7: 63-70
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and storage solutions on the color stability of resin-based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 587-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Badra VV, Faraoni JJ, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of different beverages on the microhardness and surface roughness of resin composites. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 213-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Aliping-McKenzie M, Linden RW, Nicholson JW. The effect of Coca-Cola and fruit juices on the surface hardness of glass-ionomers and ‘compomers’. J Oral Rehabil 2004; 31: 1046-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sajewicz E. Tribological behaviour of human enamel in red wine and apple juice environments. Wear 2007; 262: 308-15
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Catelan A, Briso AL, Sundfeld RH, Goiato MC, dos Santos PH. Color stability of sealed composite resin restorative materials after ultraviolet artificial aging and immersion in staining solutions. J Prosthet Dent 2011; 105: 236-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Moraes RR, Marimon JL, Schneider LF, Correr SobrinhoL, Camacho GB, Bueno M. Carbamide peroxide bleaching agents: Effects on surface roughness of enamel, composite and porcelain. Clin Oral Investig 2006; 10: 23-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Dede DÖ, Sahin O, Koroglu A, Yilmaz B. Effect of sealant agents on the color stability and surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2016 pii: S0022-391300032-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface roughness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 185-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Tuncer D, Karaman E, Firat E. Does the temperature of beverages affect the surface roughness, hardness, and color stability of a composite resin?. Eur J Dent 2013; 7: 165-71
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar