Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2016; 10(02): 225-229
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.178318
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Effects of adding silica particles on certain properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement

Nayef H. Felemban
1   Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
,
Mohamed I. Ebrahim
2   Department Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2019 (online)

  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of incorporation of silica particles with different concentrations on some properties of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC): Microleakage, compressive strength, tensile strength, water sorption, and solubility. Materials and Methods: Silica particle was incorporated into RMGIC powder to study its effects, one type of RMGIC (Type II visible light-cured) and three concentrations of silica particles (0.06, 0.08, and 0.1% weight) were used. One hundred and twenty specimens were fabricated for measuring microleakage, compressive strength, tensile strength, water sorption, and solubility. Statistical Analysis: One-way analysis of variance and Tukey's tests were used for measuring significance between means where P ≤ 0.05. Results: RMGIC specimens without any additives showed significantly highest microleakage and lowest compressive and tensile strengths. Conclusion: Silica particles added to RMGIC have the potential as a reliable restorative material with increased compressive strength, tensile strength, and water sorption but decreased microleakage and water solubility.

Key words:

Class V - glass-ionomer - microleakage - silica particle - teeth restoration
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Forss H, Widström E. From amalgam to composite: Selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand 2001; 59: 57-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: Between glass-ionomer cements and composites. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 529-39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kobayashi M, Kon M, Miyai K, Asaoka K. Strengthening of glass-ionomer cement by compounding short fibres with CaO-P2O5-SiO2-Al2O3 glass. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 2051-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Irie M, Suzuki K. Water storage effect on the marginal seal of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 272-78
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Feilzer AJ, Kakaboura AI, de Gee AJ, Davidson CL. The influence of water sorption on the development of setting shrinkage stress in traditional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 186-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tjandrawinata R, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K. Effect of adding spherical silica filler on physico-mechanical properties of resin modified glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater J 2004; 23: 146-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tjandrawinata R, Irie M, Suzuki K. Marginal gap formation and fluoride release of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement: Effect of silanized spherical silica filler addition. Dent Mater J 2004; 23: 305-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Forsten L. Fluoride release from a glass ionomer cement. Scand J Dent Res 1977; 85: 503-4
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Nicholson JW, Braybrook JH, Wasson EA. The biocompatibility of glass-poly(alkenoate) (Glass-Ionomer) cements: A review. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 1991; 2: 277-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 von Fraunhofer JA, Adachi EI, Barnes DM, Romberg E. The effect of tooth preparation on microleakage behavior. Oper Dent 2000; 25: 526-33
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Fuentes V, Prati C, Garcia-Godoy F. Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials. J Dent 2003; 31: 43-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Musanje L, Shu M, Darvell BW. Water sorption and mechanical behaviour of cosmetic direct restorative materials in artificial saliva. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 394-401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ortengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S, Ruyter IE. Water sorption and solubility of dental composites and identification of monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil 2001; 28: 1106-15
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Oysaed H, Ruyter I. Composites for use in posterior teeth: Mechanical properties tested under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1986; 20: 261-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kouros P, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Koulaouzidou E, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Tziafas D. Pulp response to dentine adhesives: A study on mature human pulps. Eur J Dent 2013; 7 (Suppl. 01) S26-32
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Karaman E, Yazici AR, Aksoy B, Karabulut E, Ozgunaltay G, Dayangac B. Effect of operator variability on microleakage with different adhesive systems. Eur J Dent 2013; 7 (Suppl. 01) S60-5
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Irie M, Tjandrawinata R, Suzuki K. Effect of delayed polishing periods on interfacial gap formation of class V restorations. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 552-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Arita K, Lucas ME, Nishino M. The effect of adding hydroxyapatite on the flexural strength of glass ionomer cement. Dent Mater J 2003; 22: 126-36
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Hatanaka K, Irie M, Tjandrawinata R, Suzuki K. Effect of spherical silica filler addition on immediate interfacial gap-formation in class V cavity and mechanical properties of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. Dent Mater J 2006; 25: 415-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Halvorson RH, Erickson RL, Davidson CL. The effect of filler and silane content on conversion of resin-based composite. Dent Mater 2003; 19: 327-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Davidson C, Mjör I. Advances in Glass-ionomer Cements. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc.; 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Sakaguchi RL, Cross M, Douglas WH. A simple model of crack propagation in dental restorations. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 131-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composites: Properties and fractography. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 290-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Pearson GJ. Long term water sorption and solubility of composite filling materials. J Dent 1979; 7: 64-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Braden M, Causton EE, Clarke RL. Diffusion of water in composite filling materials. J Dent Res 1976; 55: 730-2
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Zui S, Arai K. A study on visible light-cured composite resins: The influence of long-term water immersion on physical and mechanical properties. Dent Mater J 1986; 5: 602-15
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Um CM, Oilo G. The effect of early water contact on glass-ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 209-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 883-94
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of ketones on selected mechanical properties of resin composites. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1847-50
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Davidson CL. Glass-ionomer bases under posterior composites. J Esthet Dent 1994; 6: 223-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar