Subscribe to RSS
![](/products/assets/desktop/img/oa-logo.png)
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.178313
Patients’ satisfaction and maintenance of fixed partial denture
Publication History
Publication Date:
23 September 2019 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00042133/201602/lookinside/thumbnails/10-4103-1305-7456-178313_00250-1.jpg)
ABSTRACT
Objectives: The aims of this study were to evaluate patient satisfaction with fixed prosthesis following placement and to assess the oral health and oral hygiene practices awareness by survey questionnaire. Materials and Methods: One hundred and ninety-two questionnaires were filled by patients wearing fixed prosthesis; the questionnaire included the subjective perception of treatment with fixed prosthesis, patients’ perception of clinical outcome, regarding esthetics, masticatory function, speech, and together patient's attitude toward oral hygiene measures. Results: Results showed that 84% of the patients were satisfied with their fixed prosthesis, while only 46.4% of patients were satisfied with the chewing ability. In concern, with esthetic outcome, 80% of patients showed that they were satisfied with the esthetic. The results showed that a high significantly number of patients did not use any form of interdental aids’ to clean their fixed prosthesis (94%). The main reason for not using any dental aids’ (91.1%) was a lack of post fixed prosthodontics instructions and not been informed by the dentist. Conclusion: High percentages of patients were satisfied with their fixed prosthesis. The most important finding of this study was that majority of patients showed a lack of knowledge regarding post fixed prosthodontics instructions and the significance of maintenance of fixed prosthesis using dental aids’. Of particular concern was the majority of dentists did not pay attention to the post treatment instructions concerning the maintenance of fixed prosthesis.
-
REFERENCES
- 1 Fiske J, Davis DM, Frances C, Gelbier S. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. Br Dent J 1998; 184: 90-3
- 2 Newton JT, Prabhu N, Robinson PG. The impact of dental appearance on the appraisal of personal characteristics. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 429-34
- 3 Nikias MK, Sollecito WA, Fink R. An empirical approach to developing multidimensional oral status profiles. J Public Health Dent 1978; 38: 148-58
- 4 Leao A, Sheiham A. Relation between clinical dental status and subjective impacts on daily living. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1408-13
- 5 Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Social impact of oral conditions among older adults. Aust Dent J 1994; 39: 358-64
- 6 Elias AC, Sheiham A. The relationship between satisfaction with mouth and number and position of teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 649-61
- 7 Yoshida M, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, Hiasa K. Correlation between quality of life and denture satisfaction in elderly complete denture wearers. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 77-80
- 8 Feine JS, Dufresne E, Boudrias P, Lund JP. Outcome assessment of implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 575-9
- 9 Frank RP, Brudvik JS, Leroux B, Milgrom P, Hawkins N. Relationship between the standards of removable partial denture construction, clinical acceptability, and patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 521-7
- 10 Hakestam U, Söderfeldt B, Rydén O, Glantz E, Glantz PO. Dimensions of satisfaction among prosthodontic patients. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1997; 5: 111-7
- 11 Fromentin O, Boy-Lefèvre ML. Quality of prosthetic care: Patients’ level of expectation, attitude and satisfaction. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2001; 9: 123-9
- 12 Sondell K, Söderfeldt B, Palmqvist S. Dentist-patient communication and patient satisfaction in prosthetic dentistry. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 28-37
- 13 Oates AJ, Fitzgerald M, Alexander G. Patient decision-making in relation to extensive restorative dental treatment. Part I: Characteristics of patients. Br Dent J 1995; 178: 449-53
- 14 Näpänkangas R, Salonen MA, Raustia AM. A 10-year follow-up study of fixed metal ceramic prosthodontics. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 713-7
- 15 Creugers NH, De Kanter RJ. Patients’ satisfaction in two long-term clinical studies on resin-bonded bridges. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 602-7
- 16 Stipetic J, Celebic A, Jerolimov V, Vinter I, Kraljevic S, Rajic Z. The patient's and the therapist's evaluation of bridges of different materials and age. Coll Antropol 2000; 24 (Suppl. 01) 25-9
- 17 Tan K, Li AZ, Chan ES. Patient satisfaction with fixed partial dentures: A 5-year retrospective study. Singapore Dent J 2005; 27: 23-9
- 18 Anderson JD. The need for criteria on reporting treatment outcomes. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 49-55
- 19 den Hartog L, Slater JJ, Vissink A, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Treatment outcome of immediate, early and conventional single-tooth implants in the aesthetic zone: A systematic review to survival, bone level, soft-tissue, aesthetics and patient satisfaction. J Clin Periodontol 2008; 35: 1073-86
- 20 Goiato MC, Torcato LB, Dos Santos DM, Moreno A, Antenucci RM, de Carvalho DekonSF. Quality of life and satisfaction of patients wearing implant-supported fixed partial denture: A cross-sectional survey of patients from Araçatuba city, Brazil. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015; 26: 701-8
- 21 Xiaoxian Meng, Gilbert GH, Duncan RP, Heft MW. Satisfaction with dental appearance among diverse groups of dentate adults. J Aging Health 2007; 19: 778-91
- 22 Ring L, Höfer S, Heuston F, Harris D, O'Boyle CA. Response shift masks the treatment impact on patient reported outcomes (PROs): The example of individual quality of life in edentulous patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2005; 3: 55
- 23 Cibirka RM, Razzoog M, Lang BR. Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 574-81
- 24 Stellingsma K, Bouma J, Stegenga B, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM. Satisfaction and psychosocial aspects of patients with an extremely resorbed mandible treated with implant-retained overdentures. A prospective, comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 166-72
- 25 Wismeijer D, Tawse-Smith A, Payne AG. Multicentre prospective evaluation of implant-assisted mandibular bilateral distal extension removable partial dentures: Patient satisfaction. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013; 24: 20-7
- 26 Balshi TJ, Mingledorff EB. Maintenance procedures for patients after complete fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 37: 420-31