Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2016; 10(02): 245-249
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.178312
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Evaluation of school-based prevention program in Turkey: Results of a 24-month study

Coruh Turksel Dulgergil
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Kirikkale University School of Dentistry, Kirikkale, Turkiye
,
Ertugrul Ercan
1   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Kirikkale University School of Dentistry, Kirikkale, Turkiye
,
Hakan Colak
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Zirve University School of Dentistry, Gaziantep, Turkiye
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: In this paper, cavity experiences of children with different levels of eruption and cavity activities that are enrolled at an elementary school with semi-rural characteristics in Kırıkkale Provincial center were monitored for 2 years after a variety of protective applications. Materials and Methods: Three hundred and twenty-two children at the age of 7–11 were included in this study. Children were grouped as follows according to their cavity experiences and applications done: Group 1 - control group (with or without cavities) – was given hygiene training only; Group 2 - with medium level cavity activity (2–4 cavities in average) – oral hygiene training + surface restoration applied; Group 3 - children with 2–4 cavities on average – oral hygiene training + professional flour gel applied; Group 4 - children with 2–4 cavities in average – oral hygiene training + flour gel applied with brush; Group 5 - children with extreme cavity activity (children with 5 or more cavities) – oral hygiene training + surface restoration + professional flour gel combination applied. Results: At the end of the 2nd year, 277 children were reached. The increase of number of cavities in permanent teeth was determined as 35%, 0%, 1%, 0%, and 7% in groups 1–5, respectively. The difference between groups was found to be significant (Chi-square analysis, Pearson Chi-square = 27.002, P < 0.01). Conclusion: These findings have showed that, in Kırıkkale Provincial center, some cavity-preventive measures such as surface restoration and gel applications, along with hygiene training, could provide optimum protection for school-age children.

Key words:

Atraumatic restorative treatment surface restoration - flour gel - gel application with brush - protective measures - tooth cavity
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Ministry of Health of Turkey Report. 2002. Ankara, Turkiye:
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Tinanoff N, Palmer CA. Dietary determinants of dental caries and dietary recommendations for preschool children. J Public Health Dent 2000; 60: 197-206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Doğan G, Gökalp S, Tekçiçek M, Berberoğlu A, Ünlüer Ş. The oral health profile of 5, 12 and 15 year olds, Turkey-2004. Clinical Dentistry and Resarch 2007; 31: 3-10
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Beltrán-Aguilar ED, Estupiñán-Day S, Báez R. Analysis of prevalence and trends of dental caries in the Americas between the 1970s and 1990s. Int Dent J 1999; 49: 322-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 van Palenstein HeldermanW, Mikx F, Begum A, Adyatmaka A, Bajracharya M, Kikwilu E. et al. Integrating oral health into primary health care – Experiences in Bangladesh, Indonesia, Nepal and Tanzania. Int Dent J 1999; 49: 240-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Iwakura ML, Morita MC. Fluoride mouth-rinsing to prevent dental caries in a Brazilian municipality with fluoridated drinking water. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2004; 15: 256-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century – The approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31 (Suppl. 01) 3-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Petersen PE, Peng B, Tai B, Bian Z, Fan M. Effect of a school-based oral health education programme in Wuhan city, peoples republic of China. Int Dent J 2004; 54: 33-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Anderson MH, Bales DJ, Omnell KA. Modern management of dental caries: The cutting edge is not the dental bur. J Am Dent Assoc 1993; 124: 36-44
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Ferrazzini G. Prevention in the schools of Massagno, Ticino: Results after 8 years. SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd 1979; 89: 147-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Marthaler TM. Interim report on DMF-reduction 16 years after the introduction of a preventive program. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1981; 9: 210-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ripa LW, Leske GS, Forte F. The combined use of pit and fissure sealants and fluoride mouthrinsing in second and third grade children: One-year clinical results. Pediatr Dent 1986; 8: 158-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Lewis CW, Johnston BD, Linsenmeyar KA, Williams A, Mouradian W. Preventive dental care for children in the United States: A national perspective. Pediatrics 2007; 119: e544-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Selwitz RH, Nowjack-Raymer R, Driscoll WS, Li SH. Evaluation after 4 years of the combined use of fluoride and dental sealants. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995; 23: 30-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Songpaisan Y, Bratthall D, Phantumvanit P, Somridhivej Y. Effects of glass ionomer cement, resin-based pit and fissure sealant and HF applications on occlusal caries in a developing country field trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1995; 23: 25-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Taifour D, van Palenstein HeldermanWH. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years. Caries Res 2006; 40: 52-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar