CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2016; 10(01): 134-138
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.175701
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Cytotoxicity evaluation of Clinacanthus nutans through dimethylthiazol diphenyltetrazolium bromide and neutral red uptake assays

La-Ongthong Vajrabhaya
1   Endodontics Section, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumthani, Thailand
,
Suwanna Korsuwannawong
1   Endodontics Section, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Rangsit University, Pathumthani, Thailand
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2019 (online)

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the results of dimethylthiazol diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) and neutral red uptake (NRU) assays of Clinacanthus nutans cytotoxicity. Materials and Methods: Mouse fibroblast (L929) cells were exposed to 0.01%, 0.1%, 0.25%, and 0.5% (W/V) C. nutans in a 96-cluster-well-culture plate for 24 h. The cell viability after exposure to C. nutans was determined by MTT and NRU assays in separate tissue culture plates. The two assays were compared through an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Results: No significant differences in cytotoxicity were noted between the two assays (P > 0.05). The ICC values for agreement between two assays for the negative and positive control groups and C. nutans concentrations of 0.01%, 0.1%, 0.25%, and 0.5% were 0.84, 0.83, 0.77, 0.68, 0.74, and 0.71, respectively. Conclusion: In general, the MTT and NRU assays performed similarly, exhibiting moderate to good correlation for the evaluation of the cytotoxicity of C. nutans.

 
  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Sakdarat S, Shuyprom A, Pientong C, Ekalaksananan T, Thongchai S. Bioactive constituents from the leaves of Clinacanthus nutans Lindau. Bioorg Med Chem 2009; 17: 1857-60
  • 2 Tom. Madoorayong. Available from: http://www.madoorayong.com/2012/index.php?name=knowledge and file=readknowledge and id=293 [Last updated on 2012 Aug 07; Last cited on 2015 May 15]
  • 3 Wanikiat P, Panthong A, Sujayanon P, Yoosook C, Rossi AG, Reutrakul V. The anti-inflammatory effects and the inhibition of neutrophil responsiveness by Barleria lupulina and Clinacanthus nutans extracts. J Ethnopharmacol 2008; 116: 234-44
  • 4 Sakdarat S, Shuyprom A, Dechatiwongse Na AyudhyaT, Waterman PG, Karagianis G. Chemical composition investigation of the Clinacanthus nutans Lindau leaves. Thai J Phytopharmacy 2006; 13: 13-24
  • 5 Malek SN, Shin SK, Wahab NA, Yaacob H. Cytotoxic components of Pereskia bleo (Kunth) DC. (Cactaceae) leaves. Molecules 2009; 14: 1713-24
  • 6 International Organization for Standardization. ISO 7405 Dentistry – Evaluation of Biocompatibility of Medical Devices Used in Dentistry. Geneva: ISO; 2008
  • 7 Koulaouzidou EA, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Palaghias G, Karanika-Kouma A, Antoniades D. Cytotoxicity of dental adhesives in vitro . Eur J Dent 2009; 3: 3-9
  • 8 Korsuwannawong S, Srichan R, Vajrabhaya LO. Cytotoxicity evaluation of self-etching dentine bonding agents in a cell culture perfusion condition. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 408-14
  • 9 Edmondson JM, Armstrong LS, Martinez AO. A rapid and simple MTT-based spectrophotometric assay for determining drug sensitivity in monolayer cultures. J Tissue Cult Methods 1988; 11: 15-7
  • 10 Iz SG, Ertugrul F, Eden E, Gurhan SI. Biocompatibility of glass ionomer cements with and without chlorhexidine. Eur J Dent 2013; 7 (Suppl. 01) S89-93
  • 11 Borenfreund E, Puerner JA. A simple quantitative procedure using monolayer cultures for cytotoxicity assay (HTD/NR-90). J Tissue Cult Methods 1985; 9: 7-9
  • 12 International Standard Organization. ISO 10993-5 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices – Part 5: Tests for In Vitro Cytotoxicity. Geneva: ISO; 2009
  • 13 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10
  • 14 Bland JM, Altman DG. A note on the use of the intraclass correlation coefficient in the evaluation of agreement between two methods of measurement. Comput Biol Med 1990; 20: 337-40
  • 15 Bland JM, Altman DG. Comparing methods of measurement: Why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346: 1085-7
  • 16 Deyo RA, Diehr P, Patrick DL. Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation. Control Clin Trials 1991; 12 (04) Suppl 142S-58S
  • 17 Indrayan A. Medical Biostatistics. 3rd ed.. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2012
  • 18 Srichan R, Korsuwannawong S, Mala S. Evaluation of the proliferative and cell migration effect of Clinacanthus nutans powder on human gingival fibroblast cell line. Mahidol Dent J 2015; 35: 295-305
  • 19 Olivier P, Testard P, Marzin D, Abbott D. Effect of high polyol concentrations on the neutral red absorption assay and tetrazolium-MTT test of rat hepatocytes in primary culture. Toxicol In Vitro 1995; 9: 133-8
  • 20 Rorig KJ, Ruben Z, Anderson SN. Structural determinants of cationic amphiphilic amines which induce clear cytoplasmic vacuoles in cultured cells. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1987; 184: 165-71
  • 21 Vian L, Vincent J, Maurin J, Fabre I, Giroux J, Cano JP. Comparison of three in vitro cytotoxicity assays for estimating surfactant ocular irritation. Toxicol In Vitro 1995; 9: 185-90
  • 22 Lönnroth EC, Dahl JE. Cytotoxicity of dental glass ionomers evaluated using dimethylthiazol diphenyltetrazolium and neutral red tests. Acta Odontol Scand 2001; 59: 34-9