Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2016; 10(01): 097-102
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.175690
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Retrospective study of root canal configurations of maxillary third molars in Central India population using cone beam computed tomography Part- I

Manjusha Rawtiya
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Pavithra Somasundaram
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Shefali Wadhwani
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Swapna Munuga
2   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peoples’ Dental Academy, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Manish Agarwal
1   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Peoples College of Dental Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India
,
Priyank Sethi
3   Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Pacific Academy of Higher Education and Research, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the root and canal morphology of maxillary third molars in Central India population using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis. Materials and Methods: CBCT images of 116 maxillary third molars were observed, and data regarding the number of roots, the number of canals, and Vertucci's Classification in each root was statistically evaluated. Results: Majority of Maxillary third molars had three roots (55.2%) and three canals (37.9%). Most MB root (43.8%), DB root (87.5%), and palatal root (100%) of maxillary third molars had Vertucci Type I. Mesiobuccal root of three-rooted maxillary third molars had Vertucci Type I (43.8%) and Type IV (40.6%) configuration. Overall prevalence of C-shaped canals in maxillary third molars was 3.4%. Conclusion: There was a high prevalence of three-rooted maxillary molars with three canals.

Key words:

C-shaped - cone beam computed tomography - maxillary third molar - root canal morphology - Vertucci
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Ingle JI, Bakland LK, Baumgartner JC. Ingle's Endodontics. 6th ed.. BC Decker; 2008
    Google Scholar
  • 2 de Pablo OV, Estevez R, Péix SánchezM, Heilborn C, Cohenca N. Root anatomy and canal configuration of the permanent mandibular first molar: A systematic review. J Endod 2010; 36: 1919-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Demirbuga S, Sekerci AE, Dinçer AN, Cayabatmaz M, Zorba YO. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate root and canal morphology of mandibular first and second molars in Turkish individuals. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18: e737-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 245-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8: 1558-64
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Mohamed HA. Management of third molar teeth from an endodontic perspective. Eur J Gen Dent 2012; 1: 3
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Tsurumachi T, Kakehashi Y. Autotransplantation of a maxillary third molar to replace a maxillary premolar with vertical root fracture. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 970-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Yan Q, Li B, Long X. Immediate autotransplantation of mandibular third molar in China. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: 436-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Alavi AM, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Root and canal morphology of Thai maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 478-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984; 58: 589-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Faramarzi F, Shahriari S, Shokri A, Vossoghi M, Yaghoobi G. Radiographic evaluation of root and canal morphologies of third molar teeth in Iranian population. Avicenna J Dent Res 2013; 5: e21102
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Ahmed HA, Abu-bakr NH, Yahia NA, Ibrahim YE. Root and canal morphology of permanent mandibular molars in a Sudanese population. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 766-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Alavi AM, Opasanon A, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Root and canal morphology of Thai maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 478-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ng YL, Aung TH, Alavi A, Gulabivala K. Root and canal morphology of Burmese maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 620-30
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Scarfe WC, Levin MD, Gane D, Farman AG. Use of cone beam computed tomography in endodontics. Int J Dent 2009; 2009: 634567
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stropko JJ. Canal morphology of maxillary molars: Clinical observations of canal configurations. J Endod 1999; 25: 446-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Green D. Double canals in single roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973; 35: 689-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Singh S, Pawar M. Root canal morphology of South Asian Indian maxillary molar teeth. Eur J Dent 2015; 9: 133-44
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Weng XL, Yu SB, Zhao SL, Wang HG, Mu T, Tang RY. et al. Root canal morphology of permanent maxillary teeth in the Han nationality in Chinese Guanzhong area: A new modified root canal staining technique. J Endod 2009; 35: 651-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Nur BG, Ok E, Altunsoy M, Aglarci OS, Colak M, Gungor E. Evaluation of the root and canal morphology of mandibular permanent molars in a south-eastern Turkish population using cone-beam computed tomography. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 154-9
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pécora JD, Woelfel JB, Sousa NetoMD, Issa EP. Morphologic study of the maxillary molars. Part II: Internal anatomy. Braz Dent J 1992; 3: 53-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Orhan K, Ozer L, Orhan AI, Dogan S, Paksoy CS. Radiographic evaluation of third molar development in relation to chronological age among Turkish children and youth. Forensic Sci Int 2007; 165: 46-51
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Guerisoli DM, de Souza RA, de Sousa NetoMD, Silva RG, Pécora JD. External and internal anatomy of third molars 1998; 9: 91-4
  • 24 Sidow SJ, West LA, Liewehr FR, Loushine RJ. Root canal morphology of human maxillary and mandibular third molars. J Endod 2000; 26: 675-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sonick M, Abrahams J, Faiella RA. A comparison of the accuracy of periapical, panoramic, and computerized tomographic radiographs in locating the mandibular canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9: 455-60
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Krithikadatta J, Kottoor J, Karumaran CS, Rajan G. Mandibular first molar having an unusual mesial root canal morphology with contradictory cone-beam computed tomography findings: A case report. J Endod 2010; 36: 1712-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar