Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2015; 09(02): 234-239
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.156834
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Root canal retreatment using reciprocating and continuous rotary nickel-titanium instruments

Patricia Fonseca de Souza
1   Department of Endodontics, State University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
,
Leonardo Cantanhede Oliveira Goncalves
1   Department of Endodontics, State University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
,
Andre Augusto Franco Marques
1   Department of Endodontics, State University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
,
Emilio Carlos Sponchiado Junior
2   Department of Endodontics, Federal University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
,
Lucas da Fonseca Roberti Garcia
3   Department of Physiology and Pathology, Araraquara School of Dentistry, Univ Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Fredson Marcio Acris de Carvalho
1   Department of Endodontics, State University of Amazonas, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
04 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: The complete filling material removal during endodontic retreatment is a clinical procedure difficult to achieve. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of reciprocating and continuous rotary nickel-titanium instruments used in root canal retreatment. Materials and Methods: Forty freshly extracted human premolars were cleaned and shaped by the crown-down technique, followed by filling by the lateral compaction technique. The teeth were randomly separated into two groups (n = 20), according to the system used for filling material removal: G1 - Reciproc and G2 - ProTaper Universal Retreatment System. The teeth were photographed under operating microscope at ×8 magnification; and the total area of the root canal and remaining filling material were quantified. Results: No statistically significant difference (P > 0.05) in residual filling material was observed between groups; however, the time required for filling removal was significantly shorter for Reciproc system (P < 0.05). Conclusions: It was observed remaining filling material in all teeth, irrespective of the system used; however, root canal retreatment was faster when reciprocating motion was used.

Key words:

Reciprocating motion - root canal retreatment - rotary instruments
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Kvist T, Reit C. Postoperative discomfort associated with surgical and nonsurgical endodontic retreatment. Endod Dent Traumatol 2000; 16: 71-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Del Fabbro M, Taschieri S. A systematic review on the outcome of surgical vs non-surgical procedure for the retreatment of periapical lesions. Minerva Stomatol 2007; 56: 621-32
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kvist T. Endodontic retreatment. Aspects of decision making and clinical outcome. Swed Dent J Suppl 2001; 144: 1-57
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bramante CM, Fidelis NS, Assumpção TS, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Bramante AS. et al. Heat release, time required, and cleaning ability of MTwo R and ProTaper universal retreatment systems in the removal of filling material. J Endod 2010; 36: 1870-3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Jantarat J, Malhotra W, Sutimuntanakul S. Efficacy of grapefruit, tangerine, lime, and lemon oils as solvents for softening gutta-percha in root canal retreatment procedures. J Investig Clin Dent 2013; 4: 60-3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Giuliani V, Cocchetti R, Pagavino G. Efficacy of ProTaper universal retreatment files in removing filling materials during root canal retreatment. J Endod 2008; 34: 1381-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Yared G. Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument: Preliminary observations. Int Endod J 2008; 41: 339-44
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Zuolo AS, Mello Jr JE, Cunha RS, Zuolo ML, Bueno CE. Efficacy of reciprocating and rotary techniques for removing filling material during root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 2013; 46: 947-53
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Rios MdeA, Villela AM, Cunha RS, Velasco RC, De Martin AS, Kato AS. et al. Efficacy of 2 reciprocating systems compared with a rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal. J Endod 2014; 40: 543-6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Prichard J. Rotation or reciprocation: A contemporary look at NiTi instruments?. Br Dent J 2012; 212: 345-6
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Kim HC, Kwak SW, Cheung GS, Ko DH, Chung SM, Lee W. Cyclic fatigue and torsional resistance of two new nickel-titanium instruments used in reciprocation motion: Reciproc versus WaveOne. J Endod 2012; 38: 541-4
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Gavini G, Caldeira CL, Akisue E, Candeiro GT, Kawakami DA. Resistance to flexural fatigue of Reciproc R25 files under continuous rotation and reciprocating movement. J Endod 2012; 38: 684-7
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Bürklein S, Hinschitza K, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of two single-file systems in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth: Reciproc and WaveOne versus Mtwo and ProTaper. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 449-61
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 De-Deus G, Moreira EJ, Lopes HP, Elias CN. Extended cyclic fatigue life of F2 ProTaper instruments used in reciprocating movement. Int Endod J 2010; 43: 1063-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Pedullà E, Grande NM, Plotino G, Gambarini G, Rapisarda E. Influence of continuous or reciprocating motion on cyclic fatigue resistance of 4 different nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2013; 39: 258-61
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Beasley RT, Williamson AE, Justman BC, Qian F. Time required to remove guttacore, thermafil plus, and thermoplasticized gutta-percha from moderately curved root canals with protaper files. J Endod 2013; 39: 125-8
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Rödig T, Hausdörfer T, Konietschke F, Dullin C, Hahn W, Hülsmann M. Efficacy of D-RaCe and ProTaper Universal Retreatment NiTi instruments and hand files in removing gutta-percha from curved root canals-A micro-computed tomography study. Int Endod J 2012; 45: 580-9
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 de Mello JuniorJE, Cunha RS, Bueno CE, Zuolo ML. Retreatment efficacy of gutta-percha removal using a clinical microscope and ultrasonic instruments: Part I – an ex vivo study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 108: e59-62
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Takahashi CM, Cunha RS, de Martin AS, Fontana CE, Silveira CF, da Silveira BuenoCE. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of ProTaper universal rotary retreatment system for gutta-percha removal with or without a solvent. J Endod 2009; 35: 1580-3
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar