PDF herunterladen
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2013; 07(04): 469-473
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.120677
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

Antimicrobial efficiency of photodynamic therapy with different irradiation durations

Cihan Yildirim
1   Departments of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkiye
,
Emine Sirin Karaarslan
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkiye
,
Semih Ozsevik
2   Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkiye
,
Yasemin Zer
3   Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Gaziantep University, Gaziantep, Turkiye
,
Tugrul Sari
4   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkiye
,
Aslihan Usumez
4   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bezmialem Vakif University, Istanbul, Turkiye
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
26. September 2019 (online)

  als PDF herunterladen Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the antimicrobial efficiency of PDT and the effect of different irradiation durations on the antimicrobial efficiency of PDT. Materials and Methods: Sixty freshly extracted human teeth with a single root were decoronated and distributed into five groups. The control group received no treatment. Group 1 was treated with a 5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) solution. Groups 2, 3, and 4 were treated with methylene-blue photosensitizer and 660-nm diode laser irradiation for 1, 2, and 4 min, respectively. The root canals were instrumented and irrigated with NaOCl, ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid, and a saline solution, followed by autoclaving. All the roots were inoculated with an Enterococcus faecalis suspension and brain heart infusion broth and stored for 21 days to allow biofilm formation. Microbiological data on microorganism load were collected before and after the disinfection procedures and analyzed with the Wilcoxon ranged test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the Dunn′s test. Results: The microorganism load in the control group increased. The lowest reduction in the microorganism load was observed in the 1-min irradiation group (Group 2 = 99.8%), which was very close to the results of the other experimental groups (99.9%). There were no significant differences among the groups. Conclusions: PDT is as effective as conventional 5% NaOCl irrigation with regard to antimicrobial efficiency against Enterococcus faecalis.

Key words:

Enterococcus faecalis - irradiation duration - methylene blue - photodynamic therapy
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Siqueira Jr JF, Araujo MC, Garcia PF, Fraga RC, Dantas CJ. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals. J Endod 1997; 23: 499-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Byström A, Happonen RP, Sjögren U, Sundqvist G. Healing of periapical lesions of pulpless teeth after endodontic treatment with controlled asepsis. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3: 58-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Izu KH, Thomas SJ, Zhang P, Izu AE, Michalek S. Effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite in preventing inoculation of periapical tissues with contaminated patency files. J Endod 2004; 30: 92-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lim Z, Cheng JL, Lim TW, Teo EG, Wong J, George S. et al. Light activated disinfection: An alternative endodontic disinfection strategy. Aust Dent J 2009; 54: 108-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Chang YC, Huang FM, Tai KW, Chou MY. The effect of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine on cultured human periodontal ligament cells. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92: 446-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Grigoratos D, Knowles J, Ng YL, Gulabivala K. Effect of exposing dentine to sodium hypochlorite and calcium hydroxide on its flexural strength and elastic modulus. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 113-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Byström A, Sundqvist G. Bacteriologic evaluation of the efficacy of mechanical root canal instrumentation in endodontic therapy. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89: 321-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Berutti E, Marini R, Angeretti A. Penetration ability of different irrigants into dentinal tubules. J Endod 1997; 23: 725-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sen BH, Akdeniz BG, Denizci AA. The effect of ethylenediamine-tetraacetic acid on Candida albicans. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 651-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bahcall JK, Miserendino L, Walia H, Belardi DW. Scanning electron microscopic comparison of canal preparation with Nd: YAG laser and hand instrumentation: A preliminary study. Gen Dent 1993; 41: 45-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hardee MW, Miserendino LJ, Kos W, Walia H. Evaluation of the antibacterial effects of intracanal Nd: YAG laser irradiation. J Endod 1994; 20: 377-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ramsköld LO, Fong CD, Stromberg T. Thermal effects and antibacterial properties of energy levels required to sterilize stained root canals with an Nd: YAG laser. J Endod 1997; 23: 96-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Foschi F, Fontana CR, Ruggiero K, Riahi R, Vera A, Doukas AG. et al. Photodynamic inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis in dental root canals in vitro . Lasers Surg Med 2007; 39: 782-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Merchat M, Spikes JD, Bertoloni G, Jori G. Studies on the mechanism of bacteria photosensitization by meso-substituted cationic porphyrins. J Photochem Photobiol B 1996; 35: 149-57
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Garcez AS, Nunez SC, Lage-Marques JL, Jorge AO, Ribeiro MS. Efficiency of NaOCl and laser-assisted photosensitization on the reduction of Enterococcus faecalis in vitro . Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006; 102: 93-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Soukos NS, Chen PS, Morris JT, Ruggiero K, Abernethy AD, Som S. et al. Photodynamic therapy for endodontic disinfection. J Endod 2006; 32: 979-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Williams JA, Pearson GJ, Colles MJ. Antibacterial action of photoactivated disinfection (PAD) used on endodontic bacteria in planktonic suspension and in artificial and human root canals. J Dent 2006; 34: 363-71
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Garcez AS, Ribeiro MS, Tegos GP, Nunez SC, Jorge AO, Hamblin MR. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy combined with conventional endodontic treatment to eliminate root canal biofilm infection. Lasers Surg Med 2007; 39: 59-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Gomes BP, Lilley JD, Drucker DB. Variations in the susceptibilities of components of the endodontic microflora to biomechanical procedures. Int Endod J 1996; 29: 235-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dametto FR, Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the immediate and prolonged antimicrobial action of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant against Enterococcus faecalis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 768-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Sousa EL, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions. Int Endod J 2003; 36: 1-11
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Distel JW, Hatton JF, Gillespie MJ. Biofilm formation in medicated root canals. J Endod 2002; 28: 689-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB. Enterococcus faecalis: Its role in root canal treatment failure and current concepts in retreatment. J Endod 2006; 32: 93-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Buck RA, Eleazer PD, Staat RH, Scheetz JP. Effectiveness of three endodontic irrigants at various depths in human dentin. J Endod 2001; 27: 206-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Dahlen G, Samuelsson W, Molander A, Reit C. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of enterococci isolated from the root canal. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2000; 15: 309-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Seal GJ, Ng YL, Spratt D, Bhatti M, Gulabivala K. An in vitro comparison of the bactericidal efficacy of lethal photosensitization or sodium hypochlorite irrigation on Streptococcus intermedius biofilms in root canals. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 268-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Meire MA, De Prijck K, Coenye T, Nelis HJ, De Moor RJ. Effectiveness of different laser systems to kill Enterococcus faecalis in aqueous suspension and in an infected tooth model. Int Endod J 2009; 42: 351-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Nunes MR, Mello I, Franco GC, de Medeiros JM, Dos Santos SS, Habitante SM. et al. Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy against Enterococcus faecalis, with and without the use of an intracanal optical fiber: An in vitro study. Photomed Laser Surg 2011; 29: 803-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Prates RA, Yamada Jr AM, Suzuki LC, Eiko Hashimoto MC, Cai S, Gouw-Soares S. et al. Bactericidal effect of malachite green and red laser on Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans. J Photochem Photobiol B 2007; 86: 70-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Peters LB, Wesselink PR, Buys JF, van Winkelhoff AJ. Viable bacteria in root dentinal tubules of teeth with apical periodontitis. J Endod 2001; 27: 76-81
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 George S, Kishen A. Photophysical, photochemical, and photobiological characterization of methylene blue formulations for light-activated root canal disinfection. J Biomed Opt 2007; 12: 034029
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentine hypersensitivity. A study of the patency of dentinal tubules in sensitive and nonsensitive cervical dentine. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14: 280-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Absi EG, Addy M, Adams D. Dentin hypersensitivity: The development and evaluation of a replica technique to study sensitive and non-sensitive cervical dentin. J Clin Periodontol 1989; 16: 190-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kienle A, Forster FK, Diebolder R, Hibst R. Light propagation in dentin: Influence of microstructure on anisotropy. Phys Med Biol 2003; 21: N7-14
    Google Scholar
  • 35 Zijp JR, Bosch JJ. Theoretical model for the scattering of light by dentin and comparison with measurements. Appl Opt 1993; 32: 411-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar