Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Eur J Dent 2013; 07(S 01): S033-S040
DOI: 10.4103/1305-7456.119061
Original Article
Dental Investigation Society

The effect of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on the microleakage and bond strength of silorane and micro-hybrid composite restorations

Fatih Mehmet Korkmaz
1   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkiye
,
Ozgul Baygin
2   Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkiye
,
Tamer Tuzuner
2   Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkiye
,
Bora Bagis
3   Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Izmir Katip Çelebi University, Izmir, Turkiye
,
Ipek Arslan
2   Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkiye
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2019 (online)

Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the microleakage and bond strength of Class V silorane-based and universal micro-hybrid composite restorations prepared either with diamond bur or with an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er, Cr:YSGG) laser. Materials and Methods: A total of 160 molar teeth were used for microleakage assessment and shear bond strength (SBS) test. The specimens were prepared using either diamond bur or 3 W-, 4 W- and 5 W-20 Hz Er, Cr:YSGG laser irradiation. All specimens were subjected to thermocycling (500 times at 5 ± 2°C to 55 ± 2°C, dwell time 15 s and transfer time 10 s). Microleakage was assessed using a 0.5% basic-fuchsin solution. The bond strengths were determined using a microtensile tester at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. The Kruskal Wallis test was used for the analysis of microleakage and a one-way analysis of variance test was used to analyze the SBS (p < 0.05). Results: No statistically significant differences were found (p > 0.05) between Er, Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation methods regarding microleakage and bond strength values. Conclusions: Irradiation with Er, Cr:YSGG laser was confirmed to be as effective as conventional methods for preparing cavities before adhesive restorations.

Key words:

Diamond bur - erbium - chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser - micro-hybrid composite - silorane
 

  • REFERENCES

  • 1 Weinmann W, Thalacker C, Guggenberger R. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 68-74
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Yesilyurt C, Yoldas O, Altintas SH, Kusgoz A. Effects of food-simulating liquids on the mechanical properties of a silorane-based dental composite. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 362-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Yoshikawa T, Burrow MF, Tagami J. A light curing method for improving marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 359-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Al-Boni R, Raja OM. Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13: 152-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bagis YH, Baltacioglu IH, Kahyaogullari S. Comparing microleakage and the layering methods of silorane-based resin composite in wide Class II MOD cavities. Oper Dent 2009; 34: 578-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gutknecht N, Apel C, Schäfer C, Lampert F. Microleakage of composite fillings in Er, Cr:YSGG laser-prepared class II cavities. Lasers Surg Med 2001; 28: 371-4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh LJ. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er, Cr:YSGG laser radiation. Aust Dent J 2008; 53: 172-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Jaberi Ansari Z, Fekrazad R, Feizi S, Younessian F, Kalhori KA, Gutknecht N. The effect of an Er, Cr:YSGG laser on the micro-shear bond strength of composite to the enamel and dentin of human permanent teeth. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 761-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Başaran EG, Ayna E, Başaran G, Beydemir K. Influence of different power outputs of erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser and acid etching on shear bond strengths of a dual-cure resin cement to enamel. Lasers Med Sci 2011; 26: 13-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er-YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 340-6
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yazici AR, Yýldýrým Z, Antonson SA, Kilinc E, Koch D, Antonson DE. et al. Comparison of the Er, Cr:YSGG laser with a chemical vapour deposition bur and conventional techniques for cavity preparation: A microleakage study. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 23-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Beer F, Buchmair A, Körpert W, Marvastian L, Wernisch J, Moritz A. Morphology of resin-dentin interfaces after Er, Cr:YSGG laser and acid etching preparation and application of different bonding systems. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 835-41
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Roebuck EM, Whitters CJ, Saunders WP. The influence of three Erbium: YAG laser energies on the in vitro microleakage of Class V compomer resin restorations. Int J Paediatr Dent 2001; 11: 49-56
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Kimura Y, Matsumoto N, Matsumoto K. Effects of Er, Cr:YSGG laser irradiation in human enamel and dentin: Ablation and morphological studies. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1999; 17: 155-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Murakami Y, Matsumoto K. Microleakage of composite resin restoration in cavities prepared by Er, Cr:YSGG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2002; 26: 263-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Marotti J, Geraldo-Martins VR, Bello-Silva MS, de Paula EduardoC, Apel C, Gutknecht N. Influence of etching with erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser on microleakage of class V restoration. Lasers Med Sci 2010; 25: 325-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Yaman BC, Guray BE, Dorter C, Gomeç Y, Yazýcýoglu O, Erdilek D. Effect of the erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser or diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of class V cavities restored with different adhesives and composite systems. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 785-94
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Bicer CO, Firatli E. Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and bur. Lasers Med Sci 2010; 25: 493-502
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Shigetani Y, Tate Y, Okamoto A, Iwaku M, Abu-Bakr N. A study of cavity preparation by Er: YAG laser. Effects on the marginal leakage of composite resin restoration. Dent Mater J 2002; 21: 238-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Navarro RS, Gouw-Soares S, Cassoni A, Haypek P, Zezell DM, de Paula EduardoC. The influence of erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser ablation with variable pulse width on morphology and microleakage of composite restorations. Lasers Med Sci 2010; 25: 881-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Baygin O, Korkmaz FM, Tüzüner T, Tanriver M. The effect of different enamel surface treatments on the microleakage of fissure sealants. Lasers Med Sci 2012; 27: 153-60
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Uşümez S, Orhan M, Uşümez A. Laser etching of enamel for direct bonding with an Er, Cr:YSGG hydrokinetic laser system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002; 122: 649-56
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Obeidi A, Liu PR, Ramp LC, Beck P, Gutknecht N. Acid-etch interval and shear bond strength of Er, Cr:YSGG laser-prepared enamel and dentin. Lasers Med Sci 2010; 25: 363-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Corona SA, Borsatto M, Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A, Pécora JD. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er: YAG laser preparation. Oper Dent 2001; 26: 491-7
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Scatena C, Torres CP, Gomes-Silva JM, Contente MM, Pécora JD, Palma-Dibb RG. et al. Shear strength of the bond to primary dentin: Influence of Er: YAG laser irradiation distance. Lasers Med Sci 2011; 26: 293-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Monghini EM, Wanderley RL, Pécora JD, Palma Dibb RG, Corona SA, Borsatto MC. Bond strength to dentin of primary teeth irradiated with varying Er: YAG laser energies and SEM examination of the surface morphology. Lasers Surg Med 2004; 34: 254-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Bertrand MF, Semez G, Leforestier E, Muller-Bolla M, Nammour S, Rocca JP. Er: YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: Relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38: 615-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Trajtenberg CP, Pereira PN, Powers JM. Resin bond strength and micromorphology of human teeth prepared with an Erbium: YAG laser. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 331-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Carvalho AO, Reis AF, de Oliveira MT, de Freitas PC, Aranha AC, Eduardo CdeP. et al. Bond strength of adhesive systems to Er, Cr:YSGG laser-irradiated dentin. Photomed Laser Surg 2011; 29: 747-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Celik C, Ozel Y, Baðiş B, Erkut S. Effect of laser irradiation and cavity disinfectant application on the microtensile bond strength of different adhesive systems. Photomed Laser Surg 2010; 28: 267-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 da Silva MP, Barceleiro MO, Dias KR, Zanin F. Shear bond strength of two adhesive systems bonded to Er: YAG laser-prepared dentin. Gen Dent 2011; 59: e96-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Lima AF, da Silva VB, Soares GP, Marchi GM, Baggio Aguiar FH, Lovadino JR. Influence of previous acid etching on interface morphology and bond strength of self-etching adhesive to cavosurface enamel. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 56-62
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Santini A, Mitchell S. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 219-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Santini A, Mitchell S. Microleakage of composite restorations bonded with three new dentin bonding agents. J Esthet Dent 1998; 10: 296-304
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Nakabayashi N. Adhesive bonding with 4-META. Oper Dent 1992; (Suppl. 05) 125-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Kouros P, Zafiriadis L, Koumpia E, Dionysopoulos P, Karagiannis V. Bonding of adhesives to Er: YAG laser-treated dentin. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 16-23
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Pecora JD, De SA Rocha RA, Ramos TS, Palma-Dibb RG. Assessing microleakage of different class V restorations after Er: YAG laser and bur preparation. J Oral Rehabil 2003; 30: 1008-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Gursoy T, Kazak M, Gokce K, Benderli Y. Microleakage of Class I and V resin composite restorations after bur or Er, Cr:YSGG laser preparation. J Oral Laser Appl 2003; 3: 229-33
    Google Scholar
  • 39 Hossain M, Yamada Y, Nakamura Y, Murakami Y, Tamaki Y, Matsumoto K. A study on surface roughness and microleakage test in cavities prepared by Er: YAG laser irradiation and etched bur cavities. Lasers Med Sci 2003; 18: 25-31
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Khan MF, Yonaga K, Kimura Y, Funato A, Matsumoto K. Study of microleakage at Class I cavities prepared by Er: YAG laser using three types of restorative materials. J Clin Laser Med Surg 1998; 16: 305-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Delme KI, Deman PJ, Nammour S, De Moor RJ. Microleakage of class V glass ionomer restorations after conventional and Er: YAG laser preparation. Photomed Laser Surg 2006; 24: 715-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Lin S, Caputo AA, Eversole LR, Rizoiu I. Topographical characteristics and shear bond strength of tooth surfaces cut with a laser-powered hydrokinetic system. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 451-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sennou HE, Lebugle AA, Grégoire GL. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the dentin-glass ionomer cement interface. Dent Mater 1999; 15: 229-37
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, Bicer CO, Firatli E. Leakage pathway of different nano-restorative materials in class V cavities prepared by Er: YAG laser and bur preparation. Photomed Laser Surg 2009; 27: 783-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar