Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Indian J Radiol Imaging 2009; 19(03): 191-198
DOI: 10.4103/0971-3026.54877
Interventional Radiology

Impact of ultrasonography on central venous catheter insertion in intensive care

Gopal B Palepu
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Global Hospital, Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad, India
,
Juneja Deven
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Global Hospital, Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad, India
,
M Subrahmanyam
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Global Hospital, Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad, India
,
S Mohan
Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Global Hospital, Lakdi-ka-pul, Hyderabad, India
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
  PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and Aims: The insertion of central venous catheters (CVCs) is an integral part of the management of critically ill patients. We aimed to study the impact of ultrasonography (USG) on CVC insertion in intensive care. Setting and Design: A prospective study of 450 patients requiring CVC in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital. Methods and Materials: The patients were randomized into two groups: to have CVC insertion with USG-guidance or with the anatomic landmark technique (ALT). Data were collected on patient demographics; operator experience; and method, site and side of insertion. Outcome measures included successful insertion of CVC, number of attempts needed and complications. Results: Internal jugular vein (IJV) cannulation was successful in 177/194 patients (91.2%) using ALT and in 200/205 patients (97.6%) using USG guidance, a significant difference of 6.4% (P = 0.006). Using ALT, 72.7% of cannulations could be accomplished in the first attempt as compared with 84.4% with USG guidance (P = 0.004). The overall complication rate was 28/399 (7%), with 19 (9.8%) complications in the ALT group and 9 (4.4%) in the USG group (age-, sex-, and operator-adjusted OR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.13-0.96; P = 0.03). For subclavian vein catheterization, the success rate was 26/28 (92.9%) in the ALT group and 17/17 (100%) in the USG group (P = 0.52). Using ALT, 71.4% cannulation could be accomplished in the first attempt as compared with 82.4% under USG guidance (P = 0.49). The overall complication rate was 6/45 (13.3%), with 4 (14.3%) complications in the ALT group and 2 (11.8%) in the USG group (P > 0.99). Conclusions: Real-time USG guidance improves success rates, reduces the number of attempts and decreases the complications associated with CVC insertion, especially for the IJV, and should become the standard of care in intensive care.

Keywords

Central venous catheters - internal jugular vein - subclavian vein - ultrasound-guided central lines


Publication History

Article published online:
02 August 2021

© 2009. Indian Radiological Association. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.
A-12, Second Floor, Sector -2, NOIDA -201301, India

 

  • References

  • 1 Schummer W, Schummer C, Rose N, Niesen WD, Sakka SG. Mechanical complications and malpositions of central venous cannulations by experienced operators. A prospective study of 1794 catheterizations in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:1055-9.
  • 2 Rothschild JM. Ultrasound guidance of central vein catheterization. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No 43. Making Health Care Safer. A critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices. AHRQ, Publication No 01-EO58 2001;245-253.
  • 3 National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Guidance on the use of ultrasound locating devices for placing central venous catheters. London: NICE, 2002. NICE Technology Appraisal No 49.
  • 4 Jefferson P, Ogbue MN, Hamilton KE, Ball DR. A survey of the use of portable ultrasound for central vein cannulation on critical care units in the UK. Anaesthesia 2002;57:365-8.
  • 5 Mateer J, Plummer D, Heller M, Olson D, Jehle D, Overton D, et al . Model curriculum for physician training in emergency ultrasonography. Ann Emerg Med 1994;23:95-102.
  • 6 Committee for the Development of Guidelines for the Prevention of Vascular Catheter Associated Infection; Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine. Central venous catheters. Indian J Crit Care Med 2003;7:S9-10.
  • 7 Martin MJ, Husain FA, Piesman M, Mullenix PS, Steele SR, Andersen CA, et al . Is routine ultrasound guidance for central line placement beneficial? A prospective analysis. Curr Surg 2004;61:71-4.
  • 8 Karakitsos D, Labropoulos N, De Groot E, Patrianakos AP, Kouraklis G, Poularas J, et al . Real-time ultrasound-guided catheterisation of the internal jugular vein: A prospective comparison with the landmark technique in critical care patients. Crit Care 2006;10:R162.
  • 9 Denys BG, Uretsky BF, Reddy S. Ultrasound-assisted cannulation of the internal jugular vein: A prospective comparison to the external Landmark-Guided Technique. Circulation 1993;87:1557-62.
  • 10 Takeyama H, Taniguchi M, Sawai H, Funahashi H, Akamo Y, Suzuki S, et al . Limiting vein puncture to three needle passes in subclavian vein catheterization by the infraclavicular approach. Surg Today 2006;36:779-82.
  • 11 Plaus WJ. Delayed pneumothorax after subclavian vein catheterization. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1990;14:414-5.
  • 12 Ruesch S, Walder B, Tramer MR. Complications of central venous catheters: Internal jugular versus subclavian access: A systematic review. Crit Care Med 2002;30:454-60.
  • 13 Robinson JF, Robinson WA, Cohn A, Garg K, Armstrong JD 2nd. Perforation of the great vessels during central venous line placement. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:1225-8.
  • 14 Asteri T, Tsagaropoulou I, Vasiliadis K, Fessatidis I, Papavasi-Liou E, Spyrou P. Beware Swan-Ganz complications. Perioperative management. J Cardiovasc Surg 2002;43:467-70.
  • 15 Eisenhauer E, Derveloy RJ, Hastings PR. Prospective evaluation of central venous pressure (CVP) catheters in a large citycounty hospital. Ann Surg 1982;196:560-4.
  • 16 Ullman JI, Stoelting RK. Internal jugular vein location with the ultrasound Doppler blood flow detector. Anesth Analg 1978;57:118.
  • 17 Randolph AG, Cook DJ, Gonzales CA, Pribble CG. Ultrasound guidance for placement of central venous catheters: A meta-analysis of the literature. Crit Care Med 1996;24:2053-8.
  • 18 Miller AH, Roth BA, Mills TJ, Woody JR, Longmoor CE, Foster B. Ultrasound guidance versus the landmark technique for the placement of central venous catheters in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2002;9:800-5.
  • 19 Asheim P, Mostad U, Aadahl P. Ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in infants and children. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2002;46:390-2.
  • 20 Geddes CC, Walbaum D, Fox JG, Mactier RA. Insertion of internal jugular temporary hemodialysis cannulae by direct ultrasound guidance: A prospective comparison of experienced and inexperienced operators. Clin Nephrol 1998;50:320-5.
  • 21 Gualtieri E, Deppe SA, Sipperly ME, Thompson DR. Subclavian venous catheterization: Greater success rate for less experienced operators using ultrasound guidance. Crit Care Med 1995;23:692-7.
  • 22 Kessel DO, Taylor EJ, Robertson I, Patel JV, Denton LJ, Perren TJ. Routine chest radiography following imaging-guided placement of tunneled central lines: A waste of time, money, and radiation. Nutr Clin Pract 2002;17:105-9.
  • 23 Mallory DL, McGee WT, Shawker TH, Brenner M, Bailey KR, Evans RG, et al . Ultrasound guidance improves the success rate of internal jugular vein cannulation. A prospective, randomized trial. Chest 1990;98:157-60.
  • 24 Hrics P, Wilber S, Blanda MP, Gallo U. Ultrasound-assisted internal jugular vein catheterization in the ED. Am J Emerg Med 1998;16:401-3.
  • 25 Docktor B, So CB, Saliken JC, Gray RR. Ultrasound monitoring in cannulation of the internal jugular vein: Anatomic and technical considerations. Can Assoc Radiol J 1996;47:195-201.
  • 26 Sznajder JI, Zveibil FR, Bitterman H, Weiner P, Bursztein S. Central vein catheterization: Failure and complication rates by three percutaneous approaches. Arch Intern Med 1986;146:259-61.
  • 27 Leung J, Duffy M, Finckh A. Real-time ultrasonographically-guided internal jugular vein catheterization in the emergency department increases success rates and reduces complications: A randomized, prospective study. Ann Emerg Med 2006;48:540-7.
  • 28 Gordon AC, Saliken JC, Johns D, Owen R, Gray RR. US-guided puncture of the internal jugular vein: Complications and anatomic considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1998;9:333-8.
  • 29 McGee D, Gould M. Current concepts: Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med 2003;348:1123-33.
  • 30 Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davidson A, Paisley S, Beverley C, et al . Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: Meta-analysis. BMJ 2003;327:361.
  • 31 Mansfield PF, Hohn DC, Fornage BD, Gregurich MA, Ota DM. Complications and failures of subclavian-vein catheterization. N Engl J Med 1994;331:1735-8.
  • 32 Lefrant JY, Muller L, De La Coussaye JE, Prudhomme M, Ripart J, Gouzes C, et al . Risk factors of failure and immediate complication of subclavian vein catheterization in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1036-41.
  • 33 Brooks AJ, Alfredson M, Pettigrew B, Morris DL. Ultrasound-guided insertion of subclavian venous access ports. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005;87:25-7.