HRCT evaluation of microtia: A retrospective study

Abstract

Purpose: To determine external, middle, and inner ear abnormalities on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of temporal bone in patients with microtia and to predict anatomic external and middle ear anomalies as well as the degree of functional hearing impairment based on clinical grades of microtia. Materials and Methods: It was a retrospective study conducted on Indian population. Fifty-two patients with microtia were evaluated for external, middle, and inner ear anomalies on HRCT of temporal bone. Clinical grading of microtia was done based on criteria proposed by Weerda et al. in 37 patients and degree of hearing loss was assessed using pure tone audiometry or brainstem-evoked response in 32 patients. Independent statistical correlations of clinical grades of micotia with both external and middle ear anomalies detected on HRCT and the degree of hearing loss were finally obtained. Results: The external, middle, and inner ear anomalies were present in 93.1%, 74.5%, and 2.7% patients, respectively. Combined cartilaginous and bony external auditory canal atresia (EAC) was the most common anatomic abnormality in our group of microtia patients. Hypoplastic mesotympanum represented the commonest middle ear anomaly. The incidence of combined ossicular dysplasia and facial canal anomalies was lower as compared to other population groups; however, we recorded a greater incidence of cholesteatoma. Both these factors can have a substantial impact on outcome of patients planned for surgery. We found no significant association between grades of microtia and external or middle ear anomalies. Similarly, no significant association was found between lower grades of microtia (grade I and II) and degree of hearing loss. However, association between grade III microtia and degree of hearing loss was significant. A significant association between congenital cholesteatoma and degree of pneumatization of atretic plate and mastoid process not previously studied was also recorded in our study.

Keywords

External auditory canal - high-resolution computed tomography - microtia - middle ear anomalies - temporal bone

Publication History

Article published online:
04 October 2021

• References

• 1 Mastroiacovo P, Corchia C, Botto LD, Lanni R, Zampino G, Fusco D. Epidemiology and genetics of microtia-anotia: A registry based study on over one million births. J Med Genet 1995;32:453-7.
• 2 Weerda H. Classification of congenital deformities of the auricle. Fac Plast Surg 1988;5:385-8.
• 3 Jahrsdoerfer RA, Yeakley JW, Aguilar EA, Cole RR, Gray LC. Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol 1992;13:6-12.
• 4 Jin L, Hao S, Fu Y, Zhang T, Wang Z. Clinical analysis based on 208 patients with microtia (especially reviewed oculo-auriculo-vertebral spectrum, hearing test, CT scan). Turk J Pediatr 2010;52:582-7.
• 5 Ishimoto S, Ito K, Karino S, Takegoshi H, Kaga K, Yamasoba T. Hearing levels in patients with microtia: Correlation with temporal bone malformation. Laryngoscope 2007;117:461-5.
• 6 Gassner EM, Mallouhi A, Jaschke WR. Preoperative evaluation of external auditory canal atresia on high-resolution CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:1305-12.
• 7 Ishimoto S, Ito K, Yamasoba T, Kondo K, Karino S, Takegoshi H, et al. Correlation between microtia and temporal bone malformation evaluated using grading systems. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2005;131:326-9.
• 8 Yeakley JW, Jahrsdoerfer RA. CT evaluation of congenital aural atresia: What the radiologist and the surgeon need to know. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996;20:724-31.
• 9 Siegert R, Weerda H, Mayer T, Brückmann H. High resolution computerized tomography of middle ear abnormalities. Laryngorhinootologie 1996;75:187-94.
• 10 Mayer TE, Brueckmann H, Siegert R, Witt A, Weerda H. High-Resolution CT of the temporal bone in dysplasia of the auricle and external auditory canal. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:53-65.
• 11 Kountakis SE, Helidonis E, Jahrsdoerfer RA. Microtia grade as an indicator of middle ear development in aural atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1995;121:885-6.
• 12 Takegoshi H, Kaga K. Difference in facial canal anatomy in terms of severity of microtia and deformity of middle ear in patients with microtia. Laryngoscope 2003;113:635-9.
• 13 Takegoshi H, Kaga K, Chihara Y. Facial canal anatomy in patients with mandibulofacial dysostosis: Comparison with respect to the severities of microtia and middle ear deformity. Otol Neurotol 2005;26:803-8.
• 14 Swartz JD, Faerber EN. Congenital malformations of the external and middle ear: High-resolution CT findings of surgical importance. AJNR Am J Roentgenol 1985;144:501-6.
• 15 Shriki J, Lev R, Wong BF, Sundine MJ, Hasso AN. Bifid mandibular condyle: CT and MR imaging appearance in two patients: Case report and review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1865-8.
• 16 Szentpetery A, Kocsis G, Marcsik A. The problem of the bifid mandibular condyle. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:1254-7.
• 17 Given CA 2^nd, Huang-Hellinger F, Bakera MD, Chepuria NB, Morrisa PP. Congenital absence of the internal carotid artery: Case reports and review of the collateral circulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:1953-9.