RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-16-09-0131
Comparative anatomy and biomechanical properties of atlanto-axial ligaments in equine, bovine, and canine cadaveric specimens
Publikationsverlauf
Received:
12. September 2016
Accepted:
28. Januar 2016
Publikationsdatum:
23. Dezember 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00035023/201703/lookinside/thumbnails/10-3415-vcot-16-09-0131-1.jpg)
Summary
Objectives: Atlantoaxial instability has been reported in humans, dogs, equids and ruminants. The functional role of the atlantoaxial ligaments has only been described rudimentarily in equids and ruminants. The goal of the present cadaveric study was to compare the anatomy between the different species and to comparatively assess the role of the stabilizing ligaments of the atlantoaxial joint under sagittal shear loading in canine, equine, and bovine cervical spines.
Methods: Three equine, bovine, and canine cadaveric specimens were investigated. Biomechanical testing was performed using a purpose built shear-testing device driven by a uniaxial servo-hydraulic testing machine. Three cycles in a dorsoventral direction with a constant quasi-static velocity of 0.2 mm/s up to a limiting force of 50 N (canine) or 250 N (bovine, equine), respectively, were performed for each specimen tested. Load and linear displacement were measured by the displacement sensor and load cell of the testing system at a sampling rate of 20 Hz. Tests were performed and the range of motion determined with both intact and transected atlantoaxial ligaments.
Results: The range of motion was significantly increased after transection of the ligaments only in the canine specimens. The bovine atlantoaxial joint was biomechanically more stable than in equids.
Clinical significance: Species-specific anatomical and biomechanical differences of the atlantoaxial ligaments in canines, equids, and bovines were detected. The significance of these differences and their impact on the pathogenesis of atlantoaxial subluxations and subsequent treatment remain open questions.
-
References
- 1 Watson AG, Wilson JH, Cooley AJ. et al. Occipitoatlantoaxial malformation with atlanto-axial subluxation in an ataxic calf. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1985; 187: 740-742.
- 2 White ME, Pennock PW, Seiler RJ. Atlanto-axial subluxation in five young cattle. Can Vet J 1978; 19: 79-82.
- 3 Vos NJ, Pollock PJ, Harty M. et al. Fractures of the cervical vertebral odontoid in four horses and one pony. Vet Rec 2008; 2: 116-119.
- 4 Watson AG, Mayhew IG. Familial congenital occipitoatlantoaxial malformation (OAAM) in the Arabian horse. Spine 1986; 11: 334-339.
- 5 Nixon AJ. Equine fracture repair. In: Fracture of the Vertebrae. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders 1996; 299-304.
- 6 Hülsmeyer VI, Flatz K, Putschbach K. et al. Traumatic odontoid process synchondrosis fracture with atlantoaxial instability in a calf: clinical presentation and imaging findings. Ir Vet J 2015; 68: 6.
- 7 Reber K, Bürki A, Vizcaino Reves N. et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the stabilizing function of the atlantoaxial ligaments under shear loading: a canine cadaveric study. Vet Surg 2013; 42: 918-923.
- 8 Dyce KM, Sack WO, Wensing CJG. Textbook of Veterinary Anatomy. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002: 393-402. (carnivores), 510-515 (horses), 649-655 (ruminants)
- 9 Stalin C, Gutierrez-Quintana R, Faller K. et al. A review of canine atlantoaxial joint subluxation. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2015; 28: 1-8.
- 10 Smith MD, Kotzar G, Yoo J. et al. A biomechanical analysis of atlantoaxial stabilization methods using a bovine model. C1/C2 fixation analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; 290: 285-295.