Traumatic fracture of the medial coronoid process in 24 dogs

Summary

Objective: To describe traumatic fracture of the medial coronoid process in dogs as a clinically distinct disease unrelated to congenital elbow dysplasia.

Methods: Clinical records of dogs with acute, traumatic, unilateral lameness attributable to medial coronoid process disease were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical interpretation included findings on physical examination, orthopaedic examination, and subjective gait analysis. Radiographs of the affected and contralateral elbows were obtained and reviewed for pathology. Arthroscopy of the elbow joints was performed by one of three surgeons and findings were compared to preoperative diagnostics. Postoperative follow-up was continued for 16 weeks.

Results: Twenty-four dogs were included in this study. All dogs in this study were free of radiographic evidence of medial coronoid pathology. All dogs were diagnosed with a single, large, displaced or non-displaced fracture of the medial coronoid process, with no other joint pathology. Dogs generally had an excellent short-term outcome following arthroscopic treatment of the fractured medial coronoid process.

Clinical significance: Traumatic fracture of the medial coronoid process should be considered a clinical disease distinct from dysplasia-related fragmentation and should be considered as a differential diagnosis in dogs that are presented with the complaint of acute unilateral elbow discomfort or lameness, especially after concussive activities involving the forelimb.

Keywords

Elbow dysplasia - arthroscopy - medial compartment disease - fractured medial coronoid process

• References

• 1 Griffon DJ. Surgical Diseases of the Elbow. In Tobias KM, Johnston SA. editors Veterinary Surgery: Small Animal. St. Louis: Saunders; 2012: 724-751.
• 2 Meyer-Lindenberg A, Langhann A, Fehr M. et al. Prevalence of fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna in lame adults dogs. Vet Rec 2002; 151: 230-234.
• 3 Meyer-Lindenberg A, Langhann A, Fehr M. et al. Arthrotomy versus arthroscopy in the treatment of the fragmented medial coronoid process of the ulna (fragmented coronoid process) in 421 dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16 (04) 204-210.
• 4 Fitzpatrick N, Smith TJ, Evans RB. et al. Radiographic and arthroscopic findings in the elbow joints of 263 dogs with medial coronoid disease. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 213-223.
• 5 Hazewinkel HA, Kantor A, Meij B. et al. Fragmented coronoid process and osteochondritis dissecans of the medial humeral condyle. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd 1988; 113 (Suppl. 01) 41S-46S
• 6 Fitzpatrick N, Yeadon R. Working algorithm for treatment decision making for developmental disease of the medial compartment of the elbow in dogs. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 285-300.
• 7 Burton NJ, Owen MR, Kirk LS. et al. Conservative versus arthroscopic management for medial coronoid process disease in dogs: a prospective gait evaluation. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 972-980.
• 8 Burton NJ, Perry MJ, Fitzpatrick N. et al. Comparison of bone mineral density in medial coronoid processes of dogs with and without medial coronoid process fragmentation. Am J Vet Res 2010; 71: 41-46.
• 9 Danielson KC, Fitzpatrick N, Muir P. et al. Histomorphometry of fragmented medial coronoid process in dogs: a comparison of affected and normal coronoid processes. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 501-509.
• 10 Guthrie S, Plummer JM, Vaughan LC. Aetiopathogenesis of canine elbow osteochondrosis: a study of loose fragments removed at arthrotomy. Res Vet Sci 1992; 52: 284-291.
• 11 Kirberger RM, Fourie SL. Elbow dysplasia in the dog: pathophysiology, diagnosis and control: review article. J S Afr Vet Assoc 1998; 69: 43-54.
• 12 Ness MG. Treatment of fragmented coronoid process in young dogs by proximal ulnar osteotomy. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 15-18.
• 13 Mason DR, Schulz KS, Samii VF. et al. Sensitivity of radiographic evaluation of radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog in vitro. Vet Surg 2002; 31: 125-132.
• 14 Janutta V, Hamann H, Klein S. et al. Genetic analysis of three different classification protocols for the evaluation of elbow dysplasia in German Shepherd dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2006; 47: 75-82.
• 15 LaFond E, Breur GJ, Austin CC. Breed susceptibility for developmental orthopedic diseases in dogs. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2002; 38: 467-477.
• 16 Puccio M, Marino DJ, Stefanacci JD. et al. Clinical evaluation and long-term follow-up of dogs having coronoidectomy for elbow incongruity. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 2003; 39: 473-478.
• 17 Yovich JC, Read RA. Traumatic fracture of the medial coronoid process in two Dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 7: 173-176.
• 18 Hulse D, Young B, Beale B. et al. Relationship of the biceps-brachialis complex to the medial coronoid process of the canine ulna. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 173-176.
• 19 Van Ryssen B, van Bree H, Simoens P. Elbow arthroscopy in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 191-198.
• 20 Schulz KS. What’s new in elbow arthroscopy. Proceedings of the 13th Annual American College of Veterinary Surgeons Symposium 2003. October 9 Washington DC: USA; 329-331
• 21 Minas T, Nehrer S. Current concepts in the treatment of articular cartilage defects. Orthopedics 1997; 20: 525-538.
• 22 Jaegger G, Marcellin-Little DJ, Levine D. Reliability of goniometry in Labrador Retrievers. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 979-986.
• 23 Trostel C, McLaughlin R, Pool R. Canine lameness caused by developmental orthopedic diseases: panosteitis, Legg-Calve-Perthes disease, and hypertrophic osteodystrophy. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 2003; 25: 282-293.
• 24 Cook JL. Forelimb lameness in the young patient. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 2001; 31: 55-83.
• 25 Trostel CT, McLaughlin R, Pool R. Canine lameness caused by developmental orthopedic diseases: fragmented medial coronoid process and ununited anconeal process. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 2003; 25: 112-120.
• 26 Vermote KAG, Bergenhuyzen ALR, Gielen I. et al. Elbow lameness in dogs of six years and older. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 43-50.
• 27 Cook JL, Evans R, Conzemius MG. et al. Proposed definitions and criteria for reporting time frame, outcome, and complications for clinical orthopedic studies in veterinary medicine. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 905-908.
• 28 Görtz K, Van Ryssen B, Taeymans O. Traumatic fracture of the medial coronoid process in a dog: radiographic, computed tomographic, arthroscopic and histological findings. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2004; 17: 159-162.
• 29 Wagner K, Griffon DJ, Thomas MW. et al. Radiographic, Computed tomographic, and arthroscopic evaluation of experimental radio-ulnar incongruence in the dog. Vet Surg 2007; 36: 691-698.
• 30 Werner H, Winkels P, Grevel V. et al. Sensitivity and specificity of arthroscopic estimation of positive and negative radio-ulnar incongruence in dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 437-441.