Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26(01): 06-11
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-11-07-0100
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Evaluation of vertical forces in the pads of German Shepherd dogs

A. N. A. Souza
1   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
A. C. B. C. F. Pinto
1   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
,
V. Marvulle
2   Center of Mathematical, Computation and Cognition, University of ABC, São Paulo, Brazil
,
J. M. Matera
1   Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 11 July 2011

Accepted 31 August 2012

Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objective: To evaluate vertical forces in the pads of German Shepherd dogs by relative percentage among total limb vertical forces using a pressure sensitive walkway.

Procedure: A pressure sensitive walkway was used to collect vertical force data for each pad of the limbs of 16 healthy client-owned German Shepherd dogs used for kinetic gait analysis. The vertical force for each pad was evaluated as a percentage of total limb vertical force. Weight distribution among limbs was also recorded. Velocity and acceleration were within a range of 1.3 and 1.6 ± 0.1 m/s2. The ANOVA test was used to compare data and the paired t-test was used to assess symmetry (p <0.05).

Results: The peak vertical force was higher on the metacarpal pad than on the metatarsal pad. Peak vertical force was highest on the metacarpal pad and metatarsal pad followed by the digital pads 3, 4 and 5 of the forelimb, and on the hindlimb by digital pads 3 and 4. Vertical impulse was greatest in the metacarpal pad and digital pads 3 and 4 of the forelimb and hindlimb respectively, followed by digital pads 3, 4, and 5 of the forelimb and the metatarsal pad.

Conclusion and clinical relevance: A vertical force distribution pattern was observed on the pads of the German Shepherd dogs. These data are important for improving the understanding of vertical force distribution during gait and to assess orthopaedic conditions.

Keywords

Vertical force - kinetic evaluation - dogs - pads - locomotion
 

  • References

  • 1 Defoe D. The measurement of footprints (Pedobarography). In: Klenerman L, Wood B. editors. The Human Foot: A Companion to Clinical Studies. London: Springer; 2006. pg. 117-136.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Bouisset S, Marley EJ. On when motion biomechanics emerged as a science. In: Cappozo A, Marchetti M, Tosi V. editors. Biolocomotion: A Century of Research Using Moving Pictures. Rome: Promograph; 1992. pg. 77-79.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Elftman H, Manter JT. The axis of the human foot. Science 1934; 80: 484.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Elftman H, Manter J. Chimpanzee and human feet in bipedal walking. Am J Phys Anthropol 1935; 20: 69-79.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Betts RP, Franks CI, Duckworth T, et al. Static and dynamic foot pressure measurements in clinical orthopaedics. Med Biolog Eng Comput 1980; 18: 674-684.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Birtane M, Tuna H. The evaluation of plantar pressure distribution in obese and non-obese adults. Clin Biomech 2004; 19: 1055-1059.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Scott G, Menz HB, Newcombe L. Age-related differences in foot structure and function. Gait Posture 2007; 26: 68-75.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hennig EM, Rosenbaum D. Pressure distribution patterns under the feet of children in comparison with adults. Foot Ankle 1991; 11: 306-311.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Liu XC, Thometz JG, Tassone C. et al. Dynamic plantar pressure measurement for the normal subject: Free-mapping model for the analysis of pediatric foot deformities. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25: 103-106.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hughes J, Jagoe JR, Klenerman L. Assessment of foot pressure patterns from a pedobarograph using image analysis techniques. Proc Physiol Soc J Physiol 1987; 384-387.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Hessert MJ, Vias M, Leach J. et al. Foot pressure distribution during walking in young and adults. BMC Geriatr 2005; 5: 8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Zammit GV, Menz HB, Munteanu SE. et al. Plantar pressure distribution in older people with osteoarthritis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (hallux limitus/rigidus). J Orthop Res 2008; 26: 1665-1669.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Yavuz M, Ocak H, Hetherington VJ. et al. Prediction of plantar shear stress distribution by artificial intelligence methods. J Biomech Eng 2009; 131: 91-97.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Soutas-Little RW. Force plate analysis of the walking gait in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1987; 48: 915-918.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Decamp CE. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis and the assessment of lameness in the dog. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1997; 27: 825-841.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Marghitu DB, Swaim SF, Rumph PF. et al. Dynamics analysis of ground contact pressure of English Pointer Dogs. Nonlinear Dynamics 2003; 33: 253-265.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Evans RB. et al. Distribution of vertical forces in the pads of Greyhounds and Labrador Retrievers during walking. Am J Vet Res 2004; 65: 1497-1501.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Renberg WC, Johnston SA, Ye K. Comparison of stance time and velocity as control variables in force plate analysis of dogs. Am J Vet Res 1999; 60: 814-819.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lascelles BD, Roe SC, Smith E. et al. Evaluation of a pressure walkway system for measurement of vertical limb forces in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2006; 67: 277-282.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dulaney D, Purinton T, Dookwah H. et al. Effect of starting distance on vertical ground reaction forces in the normal dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 183-185.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Molsa SH, Hielm-Bjorkman AK, Laitinen-Vapaavuori OM. Force platform analysis in clinically healthy Rottweilers: comparison with Labrador Retrievers. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 701-707.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Agostinho FS, Rahal SC, Miqueleto NSML. et al. Kinematic analysis of Labrador Retrievers and Rottweilers trotting on a treadmill. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 3: 185-191.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Durant AM, Millis DL, Headrick JF. Kinematics of stair ascent in healthy dogs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 2: 99-105.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kim SY, Kim JY, Hayashi K. et al. Skin movement during the kinematic analysis of the canine pelvic limb. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 5: 326-332.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Guillou RP, Déjardin LM, McDonald C. et al. 3-Dimensional kinematics of the normal canine elbow at the walk and at the trot [abstract]. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Veterinary Orthopedic Society. 2012. March 3-10 Crested Butte CO, USA: Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012. 25 A7.
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Malek S, Moens NMM, Monteith GJ. The precision and repeatability of a custom-made pointer device for determination of virtual landmarks in canine three-dimensional kinematics. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 2: 102-108.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Derrick TR. et al. Comparison of vertical forces in normal greyhounds between force platform and pressure walkway measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 153-157.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Souza AN, Tartarunas AC, Marvulle V. et al. Pads pressure distribution in Pittbulls with cranial cruciate ligament rupture. Proceedings of the 2011 ACVS Veterinary Symposium. 2011. November 3-5 Chicago IL, USA: pg. E47.
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Beraud R, Moreau M, Lussier B. Effect of exercise on kinetic gait analysis of dogs afflicted by osteoarthritis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 87-92.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Gibert S, Lequang T, Maitre P. et al. Sensitivity and specificity to determine lameness in dogs with a pressure walkway system [abstract]. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Conference of the Veterinary Orthopedic Society. 2012. March 3-10 Crested Butte CO, USA: Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012. 25 A21.
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Fanchon L, Grandjean D. Accuracy of asymmetry indices of ground reaction forces for diagnosis of hind limb lameness in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2007; 68: 1089-1094.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Besancon MF, Conzemius MG, Derrick TR. et al. Comparison of vertical forces in normal greyhounds between force platform and pressure walkway measurement systems. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16: 153-157.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Riggs CM, Decamp CE, Soutas-little RW. Effects of subject velocity on force plate measured ground reaction forces in healthy Greyhounds at the trot. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 1523-1526.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Voss K, Wiestner T, Galeandro L. et al. Effect of dog breed and body conformation on vertical ground reaction forces, impulses, and stance times. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 106-112.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Voss K, Damur DM, Guerrero T. et al. Force plate gait analysis to assess limb function after tibial tuberosity advancement in dogs with cranial cruciate ligament disease. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 243-249.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Poy NS, Decamp CE, Bennett RL. et al. Additional kinematic variables to describe differences in the trot between clinically normal dogs and dogs with hip dysplasia. Am J Vet Res 2000; 61: 974-978.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Souza AN, Pinto ACBCF, Tartarunas AC. et al. Correlation between hip joint radiographic classification and kinetic analysis in german shepherd dogs. Proceedings of the 2011 ACVS Veterinary Symposium. 2011. November 3-5 Chicago IL, USA: pg. E47.
    Google Scholar