Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24(05): 374-382
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-10-06-0086
Clinical Communication
Schattauer GmbH

The double-arch modified type-1b external skeletal fixator

Technique description and functional outcome for surgical management of canine antebrachial limb deformities
N. Fitzpatrick
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Surrey, UK
,
C. Nikolaou
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Surrey, UK
,
M. Farrell
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Surrey, UK
,
K. Perry
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Surrey, UK
,
S. Girling
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Surrey, UK
,
T. J. Smith
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Surrey, UK
,
R. Yeadon
1   Fitzpatrick Referrals, Halfway Lane, Eashing, Surrey, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 04 June 2010

Accepted: 06 June 2011

Publication Date:
17 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Objectives: To describe acute correction of antebrachial angular and rotational limb deformities (ARLD) using a new external skeletal fixator (ESF).

Methods: Dogs that were presented with lameness caused by ARLD were treated by radial and ulnar osteotomies and acute realignment. A modified type-1b ESF incorporating double arches (DA-ESF) and a novel connecting configuration facilitated alignment with six degrees of freedom. Bilateral deformities were corrected surgically in the same session. Aseptic preparation of both antebrachii allowed comparison of limb alignment. Radiographic evaluation was performed using centre of rotation of angulation (CORA) methodology.

Results: Thirty-five antebrachii (22 dogs) underwent surgery. Postoperative limb function was graded as good (n = 31), fair (n = 2), or poor (n = 2). Persistent medial carpal instability was associated with a suboptimal outcome. Postoperative radiographic images of the frontal and sagittal plane joint angles and elbow-to-carpus translation were compared with values that were reported in previous studies, and were within published reference ranges in most cases. Complications included delayed radial osteotomy union (n = 5), delayed ulnar osteotomy union (n = 2) and implant-associated morbidity (n = 3).

Clinical relevance: A practical technique for acute correction of complex antebrachial ARLD is suggested, incorporating a new configuration of ESF. Putative limitations of radio-graphic planning using CORA may be compensated by careful attention to intra-operative visual and palpatory assessment.

 
  • References

  • 1 Carrig CB. Growth abnormalities of the canine radius and ulna. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1983; 13: 91-115.
  • 2 Fox SM. Premature closure of distal radial and ulnar physes in the dog: Part 1. Pathogenesis and diagnosis. Compend Cont Educ Pract Vet 1984; 6: 128-138.
  • 3 Forell EB, Schwartz PD. Use of external skeletal fixation for treatment of angular deformity secondary to premature distal ulnar physeal closure. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1993; 29: 460-476.
  • 4 Theyse LF, Voorhout G, Hazewinkel HA. Prognostic factors in treating antebrachial growth deformities with a lengthening procedure using a circular external skeletal fixator system in dogs. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 424-435.
  • 5 O’Brien TR, Morgan JP, Suter PF. Epiphyseal plate injury in the dog: a radiographic study of growth disturbance in the forelimb. J Small Anim Pract 1971; 12: 19-36.
  • 6 Balfour RJ, Boudrieau RJ, Gores BR. T-plate fixation of distal closing wedge osteotomies for treatment of angular limb deformities in 18 dogs. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 207-217.
  • 7 Fox DB, Tomlinson JL, Cook JL. et al Principles of uniapical and biapical radial deformity correction using dome osteotomies and the Center of Rotation of Angulation Methodology in dogs. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 67-77.
  • 8 Newton CD, Nunamaker DM, Dickinson CR. Surgical management of radial physeal growth disturbance in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1975; 167: 1011-1018.
  • 9 Rudy RL. Corrective osteotomy for angular deformities. Vet Clin North Am 1971; 1: 549-562.
  • 10 Newton CD. Surgical management of distal ulnar physeal growth disturbances in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1974; 164: 479-487.
  • 11 Fox SM. Premature closure of distal radial and ulnar physes in the dog. Part II. Treatment. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1984; 6: 212-221.
  • 12 Vandewater A, Olmstead ML. Premature closure of the distal radial physis in the dog. Vet Surg 1983; 12: 7-12.
  • 13 Sikes RI, Olds RG, Renegar W. et al Dome osteotomy for the correction of long bone malunions: case reports and discussion of surgical technique. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1986; 22: 221-226.
  • 14 MacDonald JM, Matthiesen D. Treatment of fore-limb deformity in 11 dogs by radial dome osteotomy and external coaptation. Vet Surg 1991; 20: 402-408.
  • 15 Fox SM, Bray JC, Guerin SR. et al Antebrachial deformities in the dog: Treatment with external fixation. J Small Anim Pract 1995; 36: 315-320.
  • 16 Quinn MK, Ehrhart N, Johnson AL. et al Realignment of the radius in canine antebrachial growth deformities treated with corrective osteotomy and bilateral (type II) external fixation. Vet Surg 2000; 29: 558-563.
  • 17 Marcellin-Little DJ. Treating bone deformities with circular external skeletal fixation. Comp Cont Educ Pract Vet 1999; 21: 481-490.
  • 18 Lewis DD, Radasch RM, Beale BS. et al Initial clinical experience with the IMEXTM circular external skeletal fixation system. Part II: Use in bone lengthening and correction of angular and rotational deformities. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1999; 12: 118-127.
  • 19 Sereda CW, Lewis DD, Radasch RM. et al Descriptive report of antebrachial growth deformity correction in 17 dogs from 1999 to 2007, using hybrid linear-circular external fixator constructs. Can Vet J 2009; 50: 723-732.
  • 20 Lewis D. Recent advances in circular external skeletal fixation. In Proceedings of the British Veterinary Orthopaedic Association Spring Scientific Meeting; Birmingham, UK; 2007. April 11. pg. 32-37.
  • 21 Dismukes DI, Fox DB, Tomlinson JL. et al Use of radiographic measures and three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging in surgical correction of an antebrachial deformity in a dog. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2008; 232: 68-73.
  • 22 Fitzpatrick N, Yeadon R, Smith TJ. Early clinical experience with osteochondral autograft transfer for treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the medial humeral condyle in dogs. Veterinary Surgery 2009; 38: 246-260.
  • 23 Fitzpatrick N, Yeadon R. Working algorithm for treatment decision making for developmental disease of the medial compartment of the elbow in dogs. Vet Surg 2009; 38: 285-300.
  • 24 Marti JM, Miller A. Delimitation of safe corridors for the insertion of external fixator pins in the dog 2: Forelimb. J Sm Anim Prac 1994; 35: 78-85.
  • 25 Paley D. Translation and Angulation-Translation Deformities. In Paley D. editor. Principles of deformity correction. Berlin, Germany; Springer; 2003. pg. 203 [Figure 8-6].
  • 26 Roe SC. Classification and nomenclature of external fixators. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract 1992; 22: 11
  • 27 Marcellin-Little DJ, Ferretti A, Roe SC. et al Hinged Ilizarov external fixation for correction of antebrachial deformities. Vet Surg 1998; 27: 231-245.
  • 28 Crosse KR, Worth AJ. Computer-assisted surgical correction of an antebrachial deformity in a dog. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2010; 23: 354-361.
  • 29 Nikolaou C, Fitzpatrick N, Isaza Saldarriaga JF. et al The effect of configuration and radiographic positioning on measurements of deformity magnitude in a dog with a complex antebrachial growth deformity: Comparison between radiographic and 3D computer modeling measurements. In Proceedings of the Veterinary Orthopedic Society. 2011. March 5-12 Snowmass, Colorado, USA.; pg. 7
  • 30 Fitzpatrick N, Johnson J, Hayashi K. et al Tibial plateau leveling and medial opening crescentic osteotomy for treatment of cranial cruciate ligament rupture in dogs with tibia vara. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 444-453.
  • 31 Sestan B, Gulan G, Tudor A. et al. A new tibial torsiometer applicable to clinical practice. Coll Antropol 2009; 33: 37-41.
  • 32 Sestan B, Kozic S, Djapic T. et al Evaluation of a tibial torsiometer applicable to clinical practice. Orthopedics 2008; 31: 70
  • 33 Ruwe PA, Gage JR, Ozonoff MB. et al Clinical determination of femoral anteversion. A comparison with established techniques. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1992; 74: 820-830.
  • 34 Stahele LT, Corbett M, Wyss C. et al Lower-extremity rotational problems in children. Normal values to guide management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 39-47.
  • 35 Gross ME, Giuliano EA. Ocular patients. In Lumb and Jones’ Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia. 4th Ed. Tranquilli WJ, Thurmon JC, Grimm KA. editors. Iowa; Blackwell Publishing; 2007. pg 943-954.
  • 36 Preston CA, Schulz KS, Taylor KT. et al In vitro experimental study of the effect of radial shortening and ulnar ostectomy on contact patterns in the elbow joint of dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 1548-1556.