Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22(02): 132-136
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-08-03-0030
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

The effect of bending and twisting on the stiffness and strength of the 3.5 SOP implant

M. G. Ness
1   Croft Veterinary Hospital, Blyth, Northumberland, UK
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 31 March 2008

Accepted 01 March 2008

Publication Date:
17 December 2017 (online)

Summary

Locking plates are becoming increasingly popular in veterinary orthopaedics. The SOP is a novel locking plate system, which can be contoured with 6° of freedom and which utilises standard bone screws. The purpose of this work was to investigate the mechanical consequences of contouring the 3.5 SOP plate to support the formulation of clinical guidelines. The implants were loaded in four point bending using an industry standard protocol. The uncontoured SOP was found to be significantly stiffer and stronger than the uncontoured 3.5 DCP. Bending, and to a lesser extent, twisting, diminished the SOP’s stiffness and strength but the contoured SOP remained at least as stiff and strong as the untouched DCP.

 
  • References

  • 1 Schutz M, Sudkamp NP. Revolution in plate osteosynthesis: new internal fixator systems. J Orthop Sci 2003; 8: 252-258.
  • 2 Perren SM. The concept of biological plating using the limited contact-dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Scientific background, design and application. Injury 1991; 22: 1-41.
  • 3 Koch D. Screws and plates. Chapter in AO principles of fracture management in the dog and cat. Ed. Johnson AL, Houlton JEF, Vannini R. Pub AO Publishing, Switzerland: 2005
  • 4 Hayes WC, Perren SM. Plate-bone friction in the compression fixation of fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1972; 89: 236-240.
  • 5 Frigg R. Locking Compression Plate (LCP). An osteosynthesis plate based on the dynamic compression plate and the point contact fixator (PCFix). Injury 2001; 32: 63-66.
  • 6 Perren SM, Klaue K, Pohler O. et al. The limited contact dynamic compression plate (LC-DCP). Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1990; 109: 304-310.
  • 7 Hammel SP, Pluhar GE, Novo RE. et al. Fatigue analysis of plates used for fracture stabilization in small dogs and cats. Vet Surg 2006; 35: 573-578.
  • 8 Aquila AZ, Manos JM, Orlansky AS. et al. In vitro biomechanical comparison of limited contact dynamic compression plate and locking compression plate. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2005; 18: 220-226.
  • 9 DeTora MD, Kraus KH. Mechanical testing of locking and non-locking 3.5mm bone plates. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2008; 21: 318-322.
  • 10 Standard specification and test method for metallic bone plates, ASTM F382–99(re-approved 2003)e1, in 2003 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, American Society for Testing and Materials. West Conshohocken, PA, ASTM, 2003.
  • 11 SOP-SOP 1.4 Orthomed, Halifax, West Yorkshire, UK. www.orthomed.co.uk Last accessed March 24, 2008.