PDF herunterladen
Methods Inf Med 2013; 52(03): 250-258
DOI: 10.3414/ME12-01-0073
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Health Providers’ Perceptions of Novel Approaches to Visualizing Integrated Health Information

T. Le
1   University of Washington, Biomedical Informatics and Medical Education, Seattle, Washington, USA
,
B. Reeder
2   University of Washington, School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington, USA
,
H. Thompson
2   University of Washington, School of Nursing, Seattle, Washington, USA
,
G. Demiris
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received: 09. August 2012

accepted: 10. Februar 2012

Publikationsdatum:
20. Januar 2018 (online)

    Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Objectives: We evaluated the design of three novel visualization techniques for integrated health information with health care providers in older adult care. Through focus groups, we identified generalizable themes related to the visualization and interpretation of health information. Using these themes we address challenges with visualizing integrated health information and provide recommendations for designers.

Methods: We recruited ten health care providers to participate in three focus groups. We applied a qualitative descriptive approach to code and extract themes related to the visualization of graphical displays.

Results: We identified a set of four common themes across focus groups related to: 1) Trust in data for decision-making; 2) Per -ceived level of detail for visualization (sub-themes: holistic, individual components); 3) Cognitive issues (subthemes: training and experience; cognitive overload; contrast); and 4) Application of visual displays. Furthermore, recommendations are provided as part of the iterative design process for the visualizations.

Conclusions: Data visualization of health information is an important component of care, impacting both the accuracy and speed of decision making. There are both functional and cognitive elements to consider during the development of appropriate visualizations that integrate different components of health.

Keywords

Aged - health services - consumer health information - data display
 

  • References

  • 1 Bertin J. Graphics and graphic information-processing. de Gruyter: 1981.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Tufte ER. The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press; 1983.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Lurie NH, Mason C. Visual Representation: Implications for Decision Making. SSRN eLibrary (Internet, cited Aug 3, 2012). Available from. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=987295.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Speier C. The influence of information presentation formats on complex task decision-making performance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2006; 64 (11) 1115-1131.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hoeke JO, Bonke B, Van Strik R, Gelsema ES. Evaluation of techniques for the presentation of laboratory data: support of pattern recognition. Methods Inf Med 2000; 39 (01) 88-92.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Feldman-Stewart D, KocReferencesovski N, McConnell BA, Brundage MD, Mackillop WJ. Perception of quantitative information for treatment decisions. Med Decis Making 2000; 20 (02) 228-238.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Feldman-Stewart D, Brundage MD, Zotov V. Further insight into the perception of quantitative information: judgments of gist in treatment decisions. Med Decis Making 2007; 27 (01) 34-43.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Zachry M, Thralls C. An Interview with Edward R. Tufte. Technical Communication Quarterly 2004; 13 (04) 447-462.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Cleveland WS, McGill R. Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data. Science 1985; 229 4716 828-833.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Pinker, Steven. A Theory of Graph Comprehension. Artificial intelligence and the future of testing. Erlbaum; 1990.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Carpenter PA, Shah P. A model of the perceptual and conceptual processes in graph comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 1998; 4 (02) 75-100.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health 2000; 23 (04) 334-340.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hudson R. Emerging Crisis: The Geriatric Care Workforce. National Academy on an Aging Society 2003; 13: 2
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Boyd AD, Funk EA, Schwartz SM, Kaplan B, Keenan GM. Top EHR challenges in light of the stimulus. Enabling effective interdisciplinary, intradisciplinary and cross-setting communication. J Healthc Inf Manag 2010; 24 (01) 18-24.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tsiknakis M, Katehakis D, Orphanoudakis S. A health information infrastructure enabling secure access to the life-long multimedia electronic health record. International Congress Series. 2004. 1268 289-294.
    Google Scholar
  • 16 An J, Wu Z, Chen H, Lu X, Duan H. Level of detail navigation and visualization of electronic health records. 3rd International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI). 2010: 2516-2519.
    Google Scholar
  • 17 An J, Lu X, Duan H. Integrated Visualization of Multi-Modal Electronic Health Record Data. The 2nd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, 2008. ICBBE. 2008: 640-643.
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Thompson HJ, Demiris G, Rue T, Shatil E, Wilamowska K, Zaslavsky O. et al A Holistic Approach to Assess Older Adults’ Wellness Using e-Health Technologies. Telemedicine and e-Health 2011; 17 (10) 794-800.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dunn HL. High-Level Wellness for Man and Society. Am J Public Health Nations Health 1959; 49 (06) 786-792.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Adams TB, Bezner JR, Drabbs ME, Zambarano RJ, Steinhardt MA. Conceptualization and measurement of the spiritual and psychological dimensions of wellness in a college population. J Am Coll Health 2000; 48 (04) 165-173.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Becker CM, Glascoff MA, Mitchell T, Durham TW, Arnold W. Assessing Perceived Health and Associated Health promoting Behaviors: An Investigation of Methods Used to Assess Health Status. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2007; 37 (02) 227-242.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bruhn JG, Cordova FD, Williams JA, Fuentes RG. The wellness process. Journal of Community Health 1977; 2 (03) 209-221.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Demiris G, Thompson HJ, Reeder B, Wilamowska K, Zaslavsky O. Using informatics to capture older adults’ wellness. Int J Med Inform (Internet). 2011 Apr 7 (cited May 17, 2011). Available from. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21482182.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Goldschmidt AJ, Luz CJ, Giere W, Lüdecke R, Jonas D. Multi-dimensional visualisation of laboratory findings and functional test results for analysing the clinical course of disease in medicine. Methods Inf Med 1995; 34 (03) 302-308.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Horn W, Popow C, Unterasinger L. Support for fast comprehension of ICU data: visualization using metaphor graphics. Methods Inf Med 2001; 40 (05) 421-424.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Le T, Wilamowska K, Demiris G, Thompson H. Integrated data visualisation: an approach to capture older adults’ wellness. Int J Electron Healthc 2012; 7 (02) 89-104.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Elting LS, Martin CG, Cantor SB, Rubenstein EB. Influence of data display formats on physician investigators’ decisions to stop clinical trials: prospective trial with repeated measures. BMJ 1999; 318 7197 1527-1531.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, Third Edition 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Inc. 2000
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Morgan DL. Reconsidering the Role of Interaction in Analyzing and Reporting Focus Groups. Qual Health Res 2010; 20 (05) 718-722.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Boyatzis RE. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1994.
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Sage. 2004.
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Morgan DL. Focus Groups As Qualitative Research. SAGE. 1997.
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Klimov D, Shahar Y, Taieb-Maimon M. Intelligent interactive visual exploration of temporal associations among multiple time-oriented patient records. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (03) 254-262.
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar