CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2020; 78(07): 397-402
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20200031
Article

A new biofeedback approach for the control of awake bruxism and chronic migraine headache: utilization of an awake posterior interocclusal device

Uma nova abordagem via biofeedback para o controle do bruxismo de vigília e de enxaqueca crônica: utilização de um dispositivo interoclusal posterior em vigília
1   Universidade de São Paulo, Hospital das Clínicas, Dentistry Division, São Paulo SP, Brazil.
,
2   Universidade de São Paulo, Medical School, Ribeirão Preto SP, Brazil.
› Institutsangaben

ABSTRACT

Background: The relationship of bidirectional comorbidity between chronic migraine and pain in the cephalic segment led us to evaluate the improvement in reducing the pain in patients diagnosed with chronic migraine headache and awake bruxism, when undergoing treatment with a partial posterior interocclusal device designed for the management and control of awake bruxism through biofeedback. Methods: Seventy-four patients were evaluated during the following periods: pretreatment, seven, thirty, ninety, one hundred and eighty days, and one year. The evaluation was carried out by measuring the pain in the pretreatment period and pain reduction after awake bruxism treatment, using clinical evaluation and numerical scales for pain. Results: Most of the patients who complained of headache migraine pain, masticatory myofascial pain, temporomandibular joint and neck pain experienced a significant reduction in overall pain, including headaches, between t0 and t30 (p<0.0001). After 30 days of using the device, it was observed that the improvement remained at the same level without any recurrence of pain up to t90. At t180 and t360, it was observed that even with the device withdrawal (at t90) the improvement remained at the same level. Conclusion: The utilization of a posterior interocclusal device designed for the management and control of awake bruxism through biofeedback seems to contribute to the reduction of pain (including migraine headache) in the majority of patients, and, even with the device withdrawal (at t90), the improvement remained at the same level, suggesting the patients succeeded in controlling their awake bruxism and consequently the pains.

RESUMO

Introdução: A relação de comorbidade bidirecional entre enxaqueca crônica e dor no segmento cefálico nos levou a avaliar a melhora na redução da dor em pacientes diagnosticados com cefaleia crônica de enxaqueca e bruxismo de vigília, quando submetidos a tratamento com dispositivo interoclusal posterior parcial projetado para o manejo e o controle do bruxismo acordado através de biorretroalimentação (biofeedback). Métodos: Setenta e quatro pacientes foram avaliados durante os seguintes períodos: pré-tratamento, sete, trinta, noventa e cento e oitenta dias, e um ano. A avaliação foi realizada por meio da avaliação da dor no período pré-tratamento e redução da dor após o tratamento do bruxismo de vigília, através de avaliação clínica e escalas numéricas de dor. Resultados: A maioria dos pacientes que se queixou de dor de cabeça com enxaqueca, dor miofascial mastigatória, articulação temporomandibular e dor no pescoço sofreu uma redução significativa na dor geral, incluindo dores de cabeça, entre t0 e t30 (p<0,0001). Após 30 dias de uso do dispositivo, observou-se que a melhora permaneceu no mesmo nível, sem recorrência da dor até t90. Em t180 e t360, observou-se que, mesmo com a retirada do dispositivo (em t90), a melhoria permaneceu no mesmo nível. Conclusão: A utilização de um dispositivo interoclusal posterior projetado para o controle do bruxismo de vigília através de biofeedback parece contribuir para a redução da dor (incluindo enxaqueca) na maioria dos pacientes, e, mesmo com a retirada do dispositivo (t90), a melhora manteve-se no mesmo nível, sugerindo que os pacientes conseguiram controlar o seu bruxismo de vigília e a dor associada a esse hábito.



Publikationsverlauf

Eingereicht: 09. Februar 2020

Angenommen: 29. Februar 2020

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
13. Juni 2023

© 2020. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Reissmann DR, John MT, Aigner A, Schön G, Sierwald I, Schiffman EL. Interaction between awake and sleep bruxism is associated with increased presence of painful temporomandibular disorder. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2017 Fall;31(4):299-305. https://doi.org/10.11607/ofph.1885
  • 2 Berger M, Szalewski L, Szkutnik J, Ginszt M, Ginszt A. Different association between specific manifestations of bruxism and temporomandibular disorder pain. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2017 Jan-Feb;51(1):7-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pjnns.2016.08.008
  • 3 Lavigne GJ, Manzini C, Kato T. Sleep bruxism. In: Kryger MH, Roth T, Dement C, editors. Principles and practice of sleep medicine. 4th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2005. p.946
  • 4 Kato T, Dal-Fabbro C, Lavigne GJ. Current knowledge on awake and sleep bruxism: overview. Alpha Omegan. 2003;7;96(2):24-32.
  • 5 Fujisawa M, Kanemura K, Tanabe N, Gohdo Y, Watanabe A, Iizuka T, et al. Determination of daytime clenching events in subjects with and without self-reported clenching. J Oral Rehabil. 2013 Oct;40(10):731-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12087
  • 6 Lobbezoo F, Ahlberg J, Raphael KG, Wetselaar P, Glaros AG, Kato T, et al. International consensus on the assessment of bruxism: report of a work in progress. J Oral Rehabil. 2018 Nov;45(11):837-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12663
  • 7 Lavigne GJ, Khoury S, Abe S, Yamaguchi T, Raphael K. Bruxism physiology and pathology: an overview for clinicians. J Oral Rehabil. 2008 Jul;35(7):476-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01881.x
  • 8 Winocur E, Uziel N, Lisha T, Goldsmith C, Eli I. Self-reported bruxism - associations with perceived stress, motivation for control, dental anxiety and gagging. J Oral Rehabil. 2011 Jan;38(1):3-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02118.x
  • 9 Sato F, Kino K, Sugisaki M, Haketa T, Amemori Y, Ishikawa T, et al. Teeth contacting habit as a contributing factor to chronic pain in patients with temporomandibular disorders J Med Dent Sci. 2006 Jun;53(2):103-9.
  • 10 Glaros AG, Williams K. Tooth contact versus clenching: oral parafunctions and facial pain. J Orofac Pain. 2012 Summer;26(3):176-80.
  • 11 Farella M, Soneda K, Vilmann A, Thomsen CE, Bakke M. Jaw muscle soreness after tooth-clenching depends on force level. J Dent Res. 2010 Jul;89(7):717-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510365448
  • 12 Svensson P, Burgaard A, Shclosser S. Fatigue and Pain in human jaw muscles during a sustained, low intensity clenching task. Arch Oral Biol. 2001 Aug;46(8):773-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9969(01)00028-0
  • 13 Glaros AG, Williams K, Lausten L, Friesen LR. Tooth contact in patient with temporomandibular disorders. Cranio. 2005 Jul;23(3):188-93. https://doi.org/10.1179/crn.2005.027
  • 14 Chen CY, Palla S, Erni S, Sieber M, Gallo LM. Nonfunctional tooth contact in healthy controls and patients with myogenous facial pain. J Orofac Pain. 2007 Summer;21(3):185-93.
  • 15 Eversole LR, Machado L. Temporomandibular joint internal derangements and associated neuromuscular disorders. J Am Dent Assoc. 1985 Jan;110(1):69-79. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1985.0283
  • 16 McCreary CP, Clark GT, Merril RL, Flack V, Oakley ME. Psychological distress and diagnostic subgroups of temporomandibular disorder patients. Pain. 1991 Jan;44(1):29-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(91)90143-l
  • 17 Glaros AG. Temporomandibular disorders and facial pain: a psychophysiological perspective. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2008 Sep;33(3):161-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-008-9059-9
  • 18 Siqueira JTT, Teixeira MJ. Dores Orofaciais - Diagnóstico e tratamento. São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 2012.
  • 19 Manfredini D, Winocur E, Guarda-Nardini L, Paesani D, Lobbezoo F. Epidemiology of bruxism in adults: a systematic review of the literature. J Orofac Pain. 2013 Spring;27(2):99-110. https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.921
  • 20 Glaros AG, Urban D, Locke J. Headache and temporomandibular disorders: evidence for diagnostic and behavioural overlap. Cephalalgia. 2007 Jun;27(6):542-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01325.x
  • 21 Hara K, Shinozaki T, Okada-Ogawa A, Matsukawa Y, Dezawa K, Nakaya Y, et al. Headache attributed to temporomandibular disorders and masticatory myofascial pain. J Oral Sci. 2016;58(2):195-204. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.15-0491.
  • 22 Dawson A. Experimental tooth clenching. A model for studying mechanisms of muscle pain. Swed Dent J Suppl. 2013;(228):9-94.
  • 23 Farella M, Soneda K, Vilmann A, Thomsen CE, Bakke M. Jaw muscle soreness after tooth-clenching depends on force level. J Dent Res. 2010 Jul;89(7):717-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034510365448
  • 24 Goncalves DA, Camparis CM, Speciali JG, Castanharo SM, Ujikawa LT, Lipton RB, et al Treatment of comorbid migraine and temporomandibular disorders: a factorial, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Orofac Pain. 2013 Fall;27(4):325-35. https://doi.org/10.11607/jop.1096
  • 25 Ohrbach R, Durham J. Biopsychosocial aspects of orofacial pain. In: Farah C, Balasubramaniam R, McCullough M, editors. Contemporary Oral Medicine. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28100-1_37-1
  • 26 [No authors listed]. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan;38(1):1-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417738202
  • 27 Gridley L, van den Dolder PA. The percentage improvement in Pain Scale as a measure of physiotherapy treatment effects. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47(2):133-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60304-4
  • 28 Slade GD, Ohrbach R, Greenspan JD, Fillingim RB, Bair E, Sanders AE, et al. Painful temporomandibular disorder: decade of discovery from OPPERA Studies. J Dent Res. 2016 Sep;95(10):1084-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034516653743
  • 29 Bair E, Gaynord S, Slade G, Ohrbach R, Fillingim RB, Greenspan JD, et al. Identification of clusters of individuals relevant to temporomandibular disorders and other chronic pain conditions: the OPPERA study. Pain. 2016 Jun;157(6):1266-78. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.20200031202000310518
  • 30 Glaros AG, Marszalek JM, Williams KB. Longitudinal multilevel modeling of facial pain, muscle tension, and stress. J Dent Res. 2016 Apr; 95(4):416-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515625216
  • 31 Ilovar S, Zolger D, Castrillon E, Car J, Huckvale K. Biofeedback for treatment of awake and sleep bruxism in adults: systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2014 May 2;3:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-42
  • 32 Goldstein RE, Auclair Clark W. The clinical management of awake bruxism. J Am Dent Assoc. 2017 Jun;148(6):387-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2017.03.005
  • 33 Arendt-Nielsen L, Morlion B, Perrot S, Dahan A, Dickenson A, Kress HG, et al. Assessment and manifestation of central sensitisation across different chronic pain conditions. Eur J Pain. 2018 Feb;22(2):216-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1140