CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2019; 77(03): 166-173
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282X20190026
Article

Polymorphisms in the CIITA −168A/G (rs3087456) and CIITA +1614G/C (rs4774) may influence severity in multiple sclerosis patients

Os polimorfismos no gene CIITA −168A/G (rs3087456) e CIITA +1614G/C (rs4774) podem influenciar a gravidade em pacientes com esclerose múltipla
1   Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
,
2   Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Neurociências Translacional, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
,
2   Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Neurociências Translacional, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
,
1   Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
,
1   Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
,
2   Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Neurociências Translacional, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
,
1   Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
,
2   Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Neurociências Translacional, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
,
2   Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Neurociências Translacional, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
,
1   Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
,
1   Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
2   Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Neurociências Translacional, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Neurologia, Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil
› Author Affiliations

ABSTRACT

It is currently unknown how genetic factors may influence the clinical course of multiple sclerosis (MS).

Objective: We examined the impact of CIITA polymorphisms −168A/G (rs3087456) and +1614G/C (rs4774) on the risk of disability progression, severity and on responses to first-line immunomodulator treatments.

Methods: Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples. We used ABI3730xl and GeneMapper v.4.0 software to identify genotype variations. All patients were followed up and clinically reassessed at three-month intervals. Disability progression was measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale and disease severity by the Multiple Sclerosis Spasticity Scale (MSSS).

Results: We included 37 men and 80 women. We found no evidence regarding the influence of the single nucleotide polymorphisms studied in the Expanded Disability Status Scale or therapeutic response of the evaluated drugs. We performed a logistic regression analysis with the MSSS and found that a less severe MS course was associated with wild type CIITA −168AA and CIITA +1614GG, as the chance of the patient progressing to MSSS2 and MSSS3 decreased in 61% and 75% with CIITA −168AA and 66% and 75% with CIITA +1614GG, respectively (p < 0.0001). Although less significant, the CIITA +1614 GC also pointed to a less severe MS course and the chance of the patient progressing to MSSS3 decreased 79% (p = 0.015). We also observed that the CIITA −168GG genotype was more frequent in MSSS2 and MSSS3 and had 40% lower odds ratio to becoming more severe MS.

Conclusion: These data suggest that CIITA −168AA, CIITA +1614GG and CIITA +1614 GC polymorphisms may be associated with a better MS clinical course. This knowledge may be useful for a better understanding of MS and its therapeutic management.

RESUMO

Atualmente não se sabe como os fatores genéticos podem influenciar o curso clínico da esclerose múltipla (EM).

Objetivo: Examinamos o impacto dos polimorfismos CIITA −168A/G (rs3087456) e CIITA +1614G/C (rs4774) no risco de progressão da incapacidade, gravidade e resposta aos tratamentos imunomoduladores de primeira linha.

Métodos: O DNA gençmico foi extraído de amostras de sangue. Utilizamos o software ABI3730xl e GeneMapper v.4.0 (Applied Biosystems) para identificar variações genotípicas. Todos os pacientes foram acompanhados e reavaliados clinicamente em intervalos de três meses. A progressão da incapacidade foi medida pela EDSS e a gravidade da doença pelo MSSS.

Resultados: Incluímos 37 homens e 80 mulheres. Não encontramos evidências sobre a influência dos SNPs estudados no EDSS e na resposta terapêutica aos fármacos avaliados. Realizamos uma análise de regressão logística com o MSSS e observamos uma evolução menos grave da EM associada aos tipos selvagens CIITA −168AA e CIITA +1614GG, pois a chance do paciente atingir MSSS2 e MSSS3 diminuiu em 61%/75%, e 66/75% respectivamente (p < 0,0001). Embora menos significativo, o CIITA +1614GC também foi relacionado com evolução menos grave da EM e a chance do paciente atingir o MSSS3 diminuiu 79% (p = 0,015). Nós também observamos que o genótipo CIITA −168GG foi mais frequente no MSSS2 e MSSS3 e teve uma razão de chance 40% menor para atingir forma mais grave da EM.

Conclusão: Estes dados sugerem que os polimorfismos CIITA −168AA, CIITA +1614GG e CIITA +1614GC podem estar associados a um melhor curso clínico da EM. Este conhecimento pode ser útil para uma melhor compreensão da EM e o seu manejo terapêutico.

Support

This study was funded by support from the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq-Brazil), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES-Brazil).




Publication History

Received: 25 June 2018

Accepted: 29 November 2018

Article published online:
21 August 2023

© 2023. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda.
Rua do Matoso 170, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP 20270-135, Brazil

 
  • References

  • 1 Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M, Weinshenker BG. Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep;343(13):938-52. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200009283431307
  • 2 Ascherio A, Munger KL, Lünemann JD. The initiation and prevention of multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2012 Nov;8(11):602-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2012.198
  • 3 Hillert J. The genetics of multiple sclerosis. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2010;51:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/400_2009_13
  • 4 Lublin FD, Reingold SC, Cohen JA, Cutter GR, Sorensen PS, Thompson AJ, et al. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: the 2013 revisions. Neurology. 2014 Jul;83(3):278-86. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.20190026201900260560
  • 5 Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology. 1983 Nov;33(11):1444-52. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444
  • 6 Roxburgh RH, Seaman SR, Masterman T, Hensiek AE, Sawcer SJ, Vukusic S, et al. Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score: using disability and disease duration to rate disease severity. Neurology. 2005 Apr;64(7):1144-51. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000156155.19270.F8
  • 7 Pan G, Simpson S Jr, Mei I, Charlesworth JC, Lucas R, Ponsonby AL, et al. Role of genetic susceptibility variants in predicting clinical course in multiple sclerosis: a cohort study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;87(11):1204-11. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2016-313722
  • 8 George MF, Briggs FB, Shao X, Gianfrancesco MA, Kockum I, Harbo HF, et al. Multiple sclerosis risk loci and disease severity in 7,125 individuals from 10 studies. Neurol Genet. 2016 Aug;2(4):e87. https://doi.org/10.1212/NXG.20190026201900260087
  • 9 Barcellos LF, Sawcer S, Ramsay PP, Baranzini SE, Thomson G, Briggs F, et al. Heterogeneity at the HLA-DRB1 locus and risk for multiple sclerosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2006 Sep;15(18):2813-24. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddl223
  • 10 Alves-Leon SV, Papais-Alvarenga R, Magalhães M, Alvarenga M, Thuler LC, Fernandez y Fernández O. Ethnicity-dependent association of HLA DRB1-DQA1-DQB1 alleles in Brazilian multiple sclerosis patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 2007 May;115(5):306-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2006.00750.x
  • 11 Brum DG, Luizon MR, Santos AC, Lana-Peixoto MA, Rocha CF, Brito ML, et al. European ancestry predominates in neuromyelitis optica and multiple sclerosis patients from Brazil. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e58925. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0058925
  • 12 Masternak K, Muhlethaler-Mottet A, Villard J, Zufferey M, Steimle V, Reith W. CIITA is a transcriptional coactivator that is recruited to MHC class II promoters by multiple synergistic interactions with an enhanceosome complex. Genes Dev. 2000 May;14(9):1156-66.
  • 13 Bronson PG, Caillier S, Ramsay PP, McCauley JL, Zuvich RL, De Jager PL, et al.; International Multiple Sclerosis Genetics Consortium. CIITA variation in the presence of HLA-DRB1*1501 increases risk for multiple sclerosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Jun;19(11):2331-40. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddq101
  • 14 Paradela ER, Alves-Leon SV, Figueiredo AL, Pereira VC, Malfetano F, Mansur LF, et al. The CIITA genetic polymorphism rs4774*C in combination with the HLA-DRB1*15:01 allele as a putative susceptibility factor to multiple sclerosis in Brazilian females. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2015 Apr;73(4):283-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20150012
  • 15 Liu J, Liu X, Liu Y, Deng S, Huang H, Chen Q, et al. Association of EVI5 rs11808092, CD58 rs2300747, and CIITA rs3087456 polymorphisms with multiple sclerosis risk: A meta-analysis. Meta Gene. 2016 Apr;9:97-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mgene.2016.04.005
  • 16 Sanchez E, Sabio JM, Jimenez-Alonso J, Callejas JL, Camps M, Ramon E, et al. Study of two polymorphisms of the MHC2TA gene with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008 Jan;47(1):102-3. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kem242
  • 17 Swanberg M, Lidman O, Padyukov L, Eriksson P, Akesson E, Jagodic M, et al. MHC2TA is associated with differential MHC molecule expression and susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and myocardial infarction. Nat Genet. 2005 May;37(5):486-94. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1544
  • 18 Koizumi K, Okamoto H, Iikuni N, Nakamura T, Kawamoto M, Momohara S, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the gene encoding the major histocompatibility complex class II transactivator (CIITA) in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jun;64(6):947-50. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2004.025767
  • 19 Lindholm E, Melander O, Almgren P, Berglund G, Agardh CD, Groop L, et al. Polymorphism in the MHC2TA gene is associated with features of the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular mortality. PLoS One. 2006 Dec;1(1):e64. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000064
  • 20 Orozco G, Robledo G, Linga Reddy MV, Garcia A, Pascual-Salcedo D, Balsa A, et al. Study of the role of a functional polymorphism of MHC2TA in rheumatoid arthritis in three ethnically different populations. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006 Nov;45(11):1442-4. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kel272
  • 21 Martínez A, Sánchez-Lopez M, Varadé J, Mas A, Martín MC, Las Heras V, et al. Role of the MHC2TA gene in autoimmune diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007 Mar;66(3):325-9. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2006.059428
  • 22 Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B, Clanet M, Cohen JA, Filippi M, et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann Neurol. 2011 Feb;69(2):292-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.22366
  • 23 Čierny D, Hányšová S, Michalik J, Kantorová E, Kurča E, Škereňová M, et al. Genetic variants in interleukin 7 receptor α chain (IL-7Ra) are associated with multiple sclerosis risk and disability progression in Central European Slovak population. J Neuroimmunol. 2015 May;282:80-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2015.03.010
  • 24 Río J, Nos C, Tintoré M, Téllez N, Galán I, Pelayo R, et al. Defining the response to interferon-beta in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Ann Neurol. 2006 Feb;59(2):344-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.20740
  • 25 Pereira VC, Malfetano FR, Meira ID, Souza LF, Liem AM, Maiolino A, et al. Clinical response to interferon beta and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis patients: a Brazilian cohort. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012 Oct;70(10):774-9. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-282X2012001000005
  • 26 Bereczky S, Mårtensson A, Gil JP, Färnert A. Short report: rapid DNA extraction from archive blood spots on filter paper for genotyping of Plasmodium falciparum. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2005 Mar;72(3):249-51. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.2005.72.249
  • 27 Patarroyo JC, Stuve O, Piskurich JF, Hauser SL, Oksenberg JR, Zamvil SS. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in MHC2TA, the gene encoding the MHC class II transactivator (CIITA). Genes Immun. 2002 Feb;3(1):34-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gene.6363808
  • 28 Hollenbach JA, Oksenberg JR. The immunogenetics of multiple sclerosis: A comprehensive review. J Autoimmun. 2015 Nov;64:13-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2015.06.010
  • 29 LeibundGut-Landmann S, Waldburger JM, Krawczyk M, Otten LA, Suter T, Fontana A, et al. Mini-review: specificity and expression of CIITA, the master regulator of MHC class II genes. Eur J Immunol. 2004 Jun;34(6):1513-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200424964
  • 30 Chang CH, Flavell RA. Class II transactivator regulates the expression of multiple genes involved in antigen presentation. J Exp Med. 1995 Feb;181(2):765-7. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.181.2.765
  • 31 Rasmussen HB, Kelly MA, Clausen J. Genetic susceptibility to multiple sclerosis: detection of polymorphic nucleotides and an intron in the 3´ untranslated region of the major histocompatibility complex class II transactivator gene. Hum Immunol. 2001 Apr;62(4):371-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0198-8859(01)00215-4
  • 32 Akkad DA, Jagiello P, Szyld P, Goedde R, Wieczorek S, Gross WL, et al. Promoter polymorphism rs3087456 in the MHC class II transactivator gene is not associated with susceptibility for selected autoimmune diseases in German patient groups. Int J Immunogenet. 2006 Feb;33(1):59-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-313X.2006.00568.x
  • 33 Martínez A, Alvarez-Lafuente R, Mas A, Bartolomé M, García-Montojo M, Las Heras V, et al. Environment-gene interaction in multiple sclerosis: human herpesvirus 6 and MHC2TA. Hum Immunol. 2007 Aug;68(8):685-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humimm.2007.05.005
  • 34 Alvarez-Lafuente R, Martinez A, Garcia-Montojo M, Mas A, Las Heras V, Dominguez-Mozo MI, et al. MHC2TA rs4774C and HHV-6A active replication in multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Neurol. 2010 Jan;17(1):129-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02758.x
  • 35 Garcia-Montojo M, Martinez A, Las Heras V, Dominguez-Mozo MI, Cenit MC, López-Cavanillas M, et al. Herpesvirus active replication in multiple sclerosis: a genetic control? J Neurol Sci. 2011 Dec;311(1-2):98-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2011.09.001
  • 36 Weinshenker BG. The natural history of multiple sclerosis: update 1998. Semin Neurol. 1998;18(3):301-7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1040881
  • 37 Cree BA, Gourraud PA, Oksenberg JR, Bevan C, Crabtree-Hartman E, Gelfand JM. Long-term evolution of multiple sclerosis disability in the treatment era. Ann Neurol. 2016 Oct;80(4):499-510. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24747
  • 38 Disanto G, Barro C, Benkert P, Naegelin Y, Schädelin S, Giardiello A, et al. Serum Neurofilament light: a biomarker of neuronal damage in multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol. 2017 Jun;81(6):857-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24954
  • 39 Lin R, Taylor BV, Simpson S Jr, Charlesworth J, Ponsonby AL, Pittas F, et al. Association between multiple sclerosis risk-associated SNPs and relapse and disability: a prospective cohort study. Mult Scler. 2014 Mar;20(3):313-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458513496882
  • 40 Muhlethaler-Mottet A, Otten LA, Steimle V, Mach B. Expression of MHC class II molecules in different cellular and functional compartments is controlled by differential usage of multiple promoters of the transactivator CIITA. EMBO J. 1997 May;16(10):2851-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/16.10.2851
  • 41 Fernández O, Fernández V, Mayorga C, Guerrero M, León A, Tamayo JA, et al. HLA class II and response to interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2005 Dec;112(6):391-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00415.x
  • 42 Dominguez-Mozo MI, Garcia-Montojo M, De Las Heras V, Garcia-Martinez A, Arias-Leal AM, Casanova I, et al. MHC2TA mRNA levels and human herpesvirus 6 in multiple sclerosis patients treated with interferon beta along two-year follow-up. BMC Neurol. 2012 Sep;12(1):107. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2377-12-107
  • 43 Miljković D, Spasojević I. Multiple sclerosis: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013 Dec;19(18):2286-334. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.5068