PDF herunterladen
Yearb Med Inform 2016; 25(01): 93-108
DOI: 10.15265/IY-2016-020
IMIA and Schattauer GmbH
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart

Recent Worldwide Developments in eHealth and mHealth to more Effectively Manage Cancer and other Chronic Diseases – A Systematic Review

J. Lewis
1   University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
,
P. Ray
2   Director, WHO Collaborating Centre on eHealth, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
,
S.-T. Liaw
1   University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

10. November 2016

Publikationsdatum:
06. März 2018 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Summary

Objectives: This paper is a systematic literature review intended to gain an understanding of the most original, excellent, state-of-the-art research in the application of eHealth (including mHealth) in the management of chronic diseases with a focus on cancer over the past two years.

Method: This review looks at peer-reviewed papers published between 2013 and 2015 and examines the background and trends in this area. It systematically searched peer-reviewed journals in databases PubMed, Proquest, Cochrane Library, Elsevier, Sage and the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE Digital Library) using a set of pre-defined keywords. It then employed an iterative process to filter out less relevant publications.

Results: From an initial search return of 1,519,682 results returned, twenty nine of the most relevant peer reviewed articles were identified as most relevant.

Conclusions: Based on the results we conclude that innovative eHealth and its subset mHealth initiatives are rapidly emerging as an important means of managing cancer and other chronic diseases. The adoption is following different paths in the developed and developing worlds. Besides governance and regulatory issues, barriers still exist around information management, interoperability and integration. These include medical records available online information for clinicians and consumers on cancer and other chronic diseases, mobile app bundles that can help manage co-morbidities and the capacity of supporting communication technologies.

Keywords

eHealth - mHealth - chronic diseases - cancer - management - self-management - self- care
 

  • References

  • 1 Atun R. Transitioning health systems for multi-morbidity.. Lancet 2015; 386 9995 721-72.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Vos T, Barber RM, Bell B, Bertozzi-Villa A, Biryukov S, Bolliger I. et al; Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.. Lancet 2015; 386 9995 743-800.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Emery J. Cancer survivorship - the role of the GP.. Aust Fam Physician 2014; 43: 521-5.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Castelnuovo G, Mauri G, Simpson S, Colantonio A, Goss S. New Technologies for the Management and Rehabilitation of Chronic Diseases and Conditions.. Biomed Res Int 2015 2015 180436.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mendoza G, Levine R, Kibuka T, Okoko L. mHealth Compendium, Volume Four.. Arlington, VA: African Strategies for Health, Management Sciences for Health; October 2014
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Ahmed T, Lucas H, Khan AS, Islam R, Bhuiya A, Iqbal M. eHealth and mHealth initiatives in Bangladesh: A scoping study.. BMC Health Serv Res 2014; 14 (Suppl. 01) 260.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Bakshi A, Talaei-Khoei A, Ray P. Adaptive policy framework: A systematic review.. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 2013; 36 (Suppl. 04) 1261-71.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Liaw ST, Rahimi A, Ray P, Taggart J, Dennis S, de Lusignan S. et al. Towards an ontology for data quality in integrated chronic disease management: A realist review of the literature.. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82 (Suppl. 01) 10-24.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Forczek E, Makra P, Lanyi CS, Bari F. The Internet as a New Tool in the Rehabilitation Process of Patients-Education in Focus.. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2015; 12 (Suppl. 03) 2373-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Li J, Talaei-Khoei A, Seale H, Ray P, Macintyre CR. Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review.. Interact J Med Res 2013; Apr 16 2 (Suppl. 01) e7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Meier CA, Fitzgerald MC, Smith JM. eHealth: Extending, Enhancing, and Evolving Health Care.. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2013; 15 (Suppl. 01) 359-82.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Conway A, Inglis SC, Clark RA. Effective Technologies for Noninvasive Remote Monitoring in Heart Failure.. Telemed J E Health 2014; 20 (Suppl. 06) 531-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Jameson JL, Longo DL. Precision Medicine — Personalized, Problematic, and Promising.. N Engl J Med 2015; 372 (Suppl. 23) 2229-34.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 National Cancer Institute Website. http://www.cancer.gov/news-events/cancer-currents-blog/2015/precision-medicine-trials.
    PubMed
  • 15 Balabanova D, Mills A, Conteh L, Akkazieva B, Banteyerga H, Dash U. et al. Good health at low cost 25 years on: lessons for the future of health system strengthening.. Lancet 2013; 381: 2118-33.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Adams AM, Ahmed T, El Arifeen S, Evans TG, Huda T, Reichenbach L. Lancet Bangladesh Team. Innovation for universal health coverage in Bangladesh: a call to action.. Lancet 2013; Dec 21 382 9910 2104-11.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Khatun F, Heywood AE, Ray PK, Hanifi SM, Bhuiya A, Liaw ST. Determinants of readiness to adopt mHealth in a rural community of Bangladesh.. Int J Med Inform 2015; 84 (Suppl. 10) 847-56.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 McAvoy BR. General practitioners and cancer control.. Med J Aust 2007; 187 (Suppl. 02) 115-7.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Roorda C, Berendsen AJ, Haverkamp M, van der Meer K, de Bock GH. Discharge of breast cancer patients to primary care at the end of hospital follow-up: A cross-sectional survey.. Eur J Cancer 2013; 49 (Suppl. 08) 1836-44.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Khan NF, Evans J, Rose PW. A qualitative study of unmet needs and interactions with primary care among cancer survivors.. Br J Cancer 2011; 105 (Suppl. 01) S46-51.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Mayer D, Gerstel A, Walton AL, Triglianos T, Sadiq TE, Hawkins NA, Davies JM. Implementing Survivorship Care Plans for Colon Cancer Survivors.”. Oncol Nurs Forum 2014; 41 (Suppl. 03) 266-73.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Moja L, Kwag KH, Lytras T, Bertizzolo L, Brandt L, Pecoraro V. et al. (2014). Effectiveness of Computerized Decision Support Systems Linked to Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Am J Public Health 2014; 104 (Suppl. 12) e12-22.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Jansen F, van Uden-Kraan CF, van Zwieten V, Witte BI, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Cancer survivors’ perceived need for supportive care and their attitude towards self-management and eHealth.. Support Care Cancer 2015; 23 (Suppl. 06) 1679-88.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 El-Gayar O, Sarnikar S, Abdullah Wahbeh A. On the Design of IT-Enabled Self-Care Systems: A Socio-technical Perspective.. System Sciences (HICSS), 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on; 2013
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ruland CM, Maffei RM, Børøsund E, Krahn A, Andersen T, Grimsbø GH. Evaluation of different features of an eHealth application for personalized illness management support: Cancer patients’ use and appraisal of usefulness.. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82 (Suppl. 07) 593-603.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 El-Gayar OF, Deokar AV, Wills MJ. Evaluating task-technology fit and user performance for an electronic health record system.. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management 2010; 11 1-2 50-65.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Chen Z, Koh PW, Ritter PL, Lorig K, Bantum EO, Saria S. Dissecting an Online Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Four Exploratory Analyses of Internet Engagement and Its Effects on Health Status and Health Behaviors.. Health Educ Behav 2015; 42 (Suppl. 01) 32-45.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Beating Bowel Cancer. Website: http://community.beatingbowelcancer.org/forum.
    PubMed
  • 29 Erfani SS, Abedin B. Effects of Web based cancer support resources use on cancer affected people: A systematic literature review.. The International Technology Management Review 2014; 4 (Suppl. 04) 201-11.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Harris MF, Pascoe S, Crosland L, Beilby J, Veitch C, Spigelman A. et al. Patients with colorectal cancer: A qualitative study of referral pathways and continuing care.. Aust Fam Physician 2012; 41 (Suppl. 11) 899-902.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kerr C, Murray E, Stevenson F, Gore C, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for chronic disease: patient and carer perspectives.. J Telemed Telecare 2005; 11: 32-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wikipedia. Website: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_device.
    PubMed
  • 33 Zulman D, Jenchura EC, Cohen DM, Lewis ET, Houston TK, Asch SM. How Can eHealth Technology Address Challenges Related to Multimorbidity? Perspectives from Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions.. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (Suppl. 08) 1063-70.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 National Health Service.. Biotechnology; New Findings in Biomedical Informatics Described from NHS Foundation Trust (Exploring medical device design and use through layers of Distributed Cognition: How a glucometer is coupled with its context).. Biotech Week; 2015: 891.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar