Maximum Diameter of Native Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Measured by Angio-Computed Tomography

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is the reference technique for the measurement of native maximum abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter when surgery is being considered. However, there is a wide choice available for the methodology of maximum AAA diameter measurement on CTA, and to date, no consensus has been reached on which method is best. We analyzed clinical decisions based on these various measures of native maximum AAA diameter with CTA, then analyzed their reproducibility and identified the method of measurement yielding the highest agreement in terms of patient management.

Materials and Methods: Three sets of measures in 46 native AAA were obtained, double-blind by three radiologists (J, S, V) on orthogonal planes, curved multiplanar reconstructions, and semi-automated-software, based on the AAA-lumen centerline. From each set, the clinical decision was recorded as follows: "Follow-up" (if all diameters <50 mm), "ambiguous" (if at least one diameter <50 mm AND at least one ≥50 mm) or "Surgery " (if all diameters ≥50 mm). Intra- and interobserver agreements in clinical decisions were compared using the weighted Kappa coefficient.

Results: Clinical decisions varied according to the measurement sets used by each observer, and according to intra and interobserver (lecture#1) reproducibility. Based on the first reading of each observer, the number of AAA proposed for surgery ranged from 11 to 24 for J, 5 to 20 for S, and 15 to 23 for V. The rate of AAAs classified as "ambiguous" varied from 11% (5/46) to 37% (17/46).

The semi-automated method yielded very good intraand interobserver agreements in clinical decisions in all comparisons (Kappa range 0.83–1.00).

Conclusion: The semi-automated method seems to be appropriate for native AAA maximum diameter measurement on CTA. In the absence of AAA outer-wallbased software more robust for complex AAA, clinical decisions might best be made with diameter values obtained using this technique.

Key Words

Abdominal aortic aneurysm - Computed tomography - Reproducibility

• References

• 1 Brewster DC, Cronenwett JL, Hallett Jr JW, Johnston KW, Krupski WC, Matsumura JS. Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. Guidelines for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Report of a subcommittee of the Joint Council of the American Association for Vascular Surgery and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 2003; 37: 1106-1117 DOI: 10.1067/mva.2003.363
• 2 Branchereau A. Small aortic aneurysm: Is evidence evident?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27: 363-365 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.01.028
• 3 Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, Verzini F, Haulon S, Waltham M. , et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2011; 41: S1eS58-S1eS58 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.09.011
• 4 Long A, Rouet L, Lindholt JS, Allaire E. Measuring the maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysms: Review and critical analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012; 43: 515-524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.01.018
• 5 Mora C, Marcus C, Barbe C, Ecarnot F, Long A. Measurement of maximum diameter of native abdominal aortic aneurysm by angio-CT: Reproducibility is better with the semi-automated method. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014; 47: 139-150 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.10.013
• 6 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-310 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8
• 7 Jaakkola P, Hippeläinen M, Farin P, Rytkönen H, Kainulainen H, Partanen K. Interobserver variability in measuring the dimensions of the abdominal aorta: Comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996; 12: 230-237 DOI: 10.1016/S1078-5884(96)80112-2
• 8 Sprouse LR, Meier GH, Parent FN, DeMasi RJ, Glickman MH, Barber GA. Is ultrasound more accurate than computed tomography for determination of maximal abdominal aortic aneurysm?. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 28: 28-35 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2004.03.022
• 9 Cayne NS, Veith FJ, Lipsitz EC, Ohki T, Mehta M, Gargiulo N. , et al. Variability of maximal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements on CT scan: Significance and methods to minimize. J Vasc Surg 2004; 39: 811-815 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.11.042
• 10 England A, Niker A, Redmond C. Variability of vascular CT measurement techniques used in the assessment abdominal aortic aneurysms. Radiography 2010; 16: 173-181 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2010.02.005
• 11 Kauffmann C, Tang A, Dugas A, Therasse E, Oliva V, Soulez G. Clinical validation of a software for quantitative follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm maximal diameter and growth by CT angiography. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77: 502-508 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.027
• 12 Dugas A, Therasse E, Kauffmann C, Tang A, Elkouri S, Nozza A. , et al. Reproducibility of abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter measurement and growth evaluation on axial and multiplanar computed tomography reformations. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2012; 35: 779-787 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0259-y
• 13 Paravastu SC, Jayarajasingam R, Cottam R, Palfreyman SJ, Michaels JA, Thomas SM. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; Jan 23; 1: CD004178 [Epub ahead of print] DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004178.pub2
• 14 RESCAN Collaborators, Bown MJ, Sweeting MJ, Brown LC, Powell JT, Thompson SG. Surveillance intervals for small abdominal aortic aneurysms: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2013; 309: 806-813 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2013.950
• 15 Investigators IT. Endovascular or open repair strategy for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: 30 day outcomes from IMPROVE randomised trial. BMJ 2014; 348: f7661 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f7661
• 16 Ghatwary TM, Patterson BO, Karthikesalingam A, Hinchliffe RJ, Loftus IM, Morgan R. , et al. A systematic review of protocols for the three-dimensional morphologic assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysms using computed tomographic angiography. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013; 36: 14-24 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-011-0296-6
• 17 Kauffmann C, Tang A, Therasse E, Giroux MF, Elkouri S, Melanson P. , et al. Measurements and detection of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth: Accuracy and reproducibility of a segmentation software. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 1688-1694 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.04.044
• 18 Bredahl K, Taudorf M, Long A, Lönn L, Rouet L, Ardon R. , et al. Three-dimensional ultrasound improves the accuracy of diameter measurement of the residual sac in EVAR patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013; 46: 525-532 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2013.09.012