PDF herunterladen
J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2011; 06(01): e1-e5
DOI: 10.1186/1749-7221-6-1
Research article
Muthoka et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Variations in branching of the posterior cord of brachial plexus in a Kenyan population[*]

Johnstone M Muthoka
1   Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O Box 30197,00100, Nairobi, Kenya
,
Simeon R Sinkeet
1   Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O Box 30197,00100, Nairobi, Kenya
,
Swaleh H Shahbal
1   Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O Box 30197,00100, Nairobi, Kenya
,
Ludia C Matakwa
1   Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O Box 30197,00100, Nairobi, Kenya
,
Julius A Ogeng’o
1   Department of Human Anatomy, University of Nairobi, P.O Box 30197,00100, Nairobi, Kenya
› Institutsangaben
Verantwortlicher Herausgeber dieser Rubrik:
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

03. Dezember 2010

07. Juni 2011

Publikationsdatum:
23. September 2014 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
   Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Background Variations in the branching of posterior cord are important during surgical approaches to the axilla and upper arm, administration of anesthetic blocks, interpreting effects of nervous compressions and in repair of plexus injuries. The patterns of branching show population differences. Data from the African population is scarce.

Objective To describe the branching pattern of the posterior cord in a Kenyan population.

Materials and methods Seventy-five brachial plexuses from 68 formalin fixed cadavers were explored by gross dissection. Origin and order of branching of the posterior cord was recorded. Representative photographs were then taken using a digital camera (Sony Cybershot R, W200, 7.2 Megapixels).

Results Only 8 out of 75 (10.7%) posterior cords showed the classical branching pattern. Forty three (57.3%) lower subscapular, 8(10.3%) thoracodorsal and 8(10.3%) upper subscapular nerves came from the axillary nerve instead of directly from posterior cord. A new finding was that in 4(5.3%) and in 3(4%) the medial cutaneous nerves of the arm and forearm respectively originated from the posterior cord in contrast to their usual origin from the medial cord.

Conclusions Majority of posterior cords in studied population display a wide range of variations. Anesthesiologists administering local anesthetic blocks, clinicians interpreting effects of nerve injuries of the upper limb and surgeons operating in the axilla should be aware of these patterns to avoid inadvertent injury. A wider study of the branching pattern of infraclavicular brachial plexus is recommended.

*This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


 

  • References

  • 1 Gray H, Susan S. Grays anatomy. El savier; London, UK: 4th edition 2004. 39.
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Moore KL, Dalley AF. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Lippincoth Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia, USA: 4th edition 1999
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Fazan VPS, André SA, Adilson LC, Omar ARF. Brachial plexus variations in its formation and main branches. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira 2003; 18 (5)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ballesteros E, Ramirez ML. Variations of the origin of collateral branches emerging from the posterior aspect of the brachial plexus. J Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury 2007; 2 (1) 14 10.1186/1749-7221-2-14
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Davis G, Kline DG, Spinner RJ, Zager EI, Garberina MJ. Clinics in neurology and neurosurgery - Nerve injury. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 537-540 10.1136/bjsm.2008.048231 18552376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kumar MRB, Vishnumaya G. Variation in the branching pattern of posterior cord of brachial plexus. Neuroanat 2008; 7: 10-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Tubbs S, Marios L, Kameron S, Tanya J, Jeremy P, Mohammadali MS, John S, William M, Jerry O. Anatomy and Quantitation of the Subscapular Nerves. Clin Anat 2007; 20: 656-659 10.1002/ca.20478 17352414
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Gupta M, Goyal N Harjeet Anomalous communications in the branches of brachial plexus. J Anat Soc India 2005; 54: 22-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chuang D. Neurotization and Free Muscle Transfer for Brachial Plexus Avulsion Injury. Hand Clinics 2007; 23: 91-104 10.1016/j.hcl.2007.02.001 17478256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Richardson PM. Recovery of Biceps Function after Delayed Repair for Brachial Plexus Injury. J trauma 1997; 42 (5) 791-792 10.1097/00005373-199705000-00007 9191658
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Yung SW, Lazarus MD, Harryman DT. Practical guidelines to safe surgery about the subscapularis. J Shoulder and Elbow Surgery 1996; 5: 467-470 10.1016/S1058-2746(96)80019-X
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Samardzic M, Grujicic D, Antunovic V. Nerve transfer in brachial plexus traction injuries. J Neurosurg 1992; 76: 191-197 10.3171/jns.1992.76.2.0191 1730947
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Tubbs RS, Tyler-Kabara EC, Aikens AC, Martin JP, Weed LL, Salter EG, Oakes WJ. Surgical anatomy of the dorsal scapular nerve. J Neurosurg 2005; 102: 910-911 10.3171/jns.2005.102.5.0910 15926718
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kerr AT. The Brachial Plexus of Nerves in Man, the Variations in its Formation and Branches. Am J Anat 1918; 23: 285-295 10.1002/aja.1000230205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hecht JS. Subscapular nerve block in the painful hemiplegic shoulder. Arch Phys Medical Rehabilitation 1992; 73: 1036-1039
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lengele B., Dhem A. Unusal variation of vasculonervous elements of the human axilla report of three cases. Arch Anat Histol Embrol 1989; 72: 57-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar