Subscribe to RSS
Please copy the URL and add it into your RSS Feed Reader.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/en/10.1055-s-00035024.xml
Thromb Haemost 2013; 110(01): 11-13
DOI: 10.1160/TH13-06-0453
DOI: 10.1160/TH13-06-0453
Current Controversies
Differences between ACC/AHA and ESC Guidelines on antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Further Information
Publication History
Received:
05 June 2013
Accepted:
06 June 2013
Publication Date:
30 November 2017 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/10.1055-s-00035024/201301/lookinside/thumbnails/10-1160-th13-06-0453-1.jpg)
Note: The review process for this Editorial was fully handled by Christian Weber, Editor in Chief.
-
References
- 1 Hamm CW, Bassand J-P, Agewall S. et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2999-3054.
- 2 Jneid H, Anderson JL, Wright RS. et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guideline for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non–ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007Guideline and Replacing the 2011 Focused Update) A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 60: 645-681.
- 3 O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD. et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial InfarctionA Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: e78-e140.
- 4 Steg PG, James SK, Atar D. et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012; 33: 2569-2619.
- 5 Serebruany V, DiNicolantonio J. Mismatch Between the European and American Guidelines on Oral Antiplatelet P2Y12 Inhibitors After Acute Coronary Syndromes. Thromb Haemost 2013; 110: 5-10.
- 6 Wiviott SD, Braunwald E, McCabe CH. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015.
- 7 Wallentin L, Becker R, Budaj A. et al. for the PLATO Investigators Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057.
- 8 Patrono C, Andreotti F, Arnesen H. et al. Antiplatelet agents for the treatment and prevention of atherothrombosis. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 2922-2932.
- 9 Mahaffey K W, Wojdyla DM, Carroll K. et al. PLATO Investigators. Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel by geographic region in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circulation 2011; 124: 544-554.
- 10 Ohman EM, Roe MT. Explaining the unexpected: insights from the PLATelet inhibition and clinical Outcomes (PLATO) trial comparing ticagrelor and clopidogrel. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 763-765.
- 11 Wallentin L, Becker RC, James SK. et al. The PLATO trial reveals further opportunities to improve outcomes in patients with acute coronary.