A clinical prediction score for upper extremity deep venous thrombosis

Summary

It was the objective of this study to design a clinical prediction score for the diagnosis of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT).A score was built by multivariate logistic regression in a sample of patients hospitalized for suspicion of UEDVT (derivation sample). It was validated in a second sample in the same university hospital, then in a sample from the multicenter OPTIMEV study that included both outpatients and inpatients. In these three samples, UEDVT diagnosis was objectively confirmed by ultrasound. The derivation sample included 140 patients among whom 50 had confirmed UEDVT, the validation sample included 103 patients among whom 46 had UEDVT, and the OPTIMEV sample included 214 patients among whom 65 had UEDVT. The clinical score identified a combination of four items (venous material, localized pain, unilateral pitting edema and other diagnosis as plausible). One point was attributed to each item (positive for the first 3 and negative for the other diagnosis). A score of –1 or 0 characterized low probability patients, a score of 1 identified intermediate probability patients, and a score of 2 or 3 identified patients with high probability. Low probability score identified a prevalence of UEDVT of 12, 9 and 13%, respectively, in the derivation, validation and OPTIMEV samples. High probability score identified a prevalence of UEDVT of 70, 64 and 69% respectively. In conclusion we propose a simple score to calculate clinical probability of UEDVT. This score might be a useful test in clinical trials as well as in clinical practice.

Keywords

Venous thrombosis - upper extremity deep vein thrombosis - clinical prediction

• References

• 1 Joffe HV. et al. Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis: a prospective registry of 592 patients. Circulation 2004; 110: 1605-1611.
• 2 Blom JW. et al. Old and new risk factors for upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3: 2471-2478.
• 3 Bernardi E. et al. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. Semin Thromb Hemost 2006; 32: 729-736.
• 4 Monreal M. et al. Upper-extremity deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. A prospective study. Chest 1991; 99: 280-283.
• 5 Prandoni P. et al. Upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis. Risk factors, diagnosis, and complications. Arch Intern Med 1997; 157: 57-62.
• 6 Hingorani A. et al. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis and its impact on morbidity and mortality rates in a hospital-based population. J Vasc Surg 1997; 26: 853-860.
• 7 Prandoni P. et al. The long term clinical course of acute deep vein thrombosis of the arm: prospective cohort study. Br Med J 2004; 329: 484-485.
• 8 Baarslag HJ. et al. Prospective study of color duplex ultrasonography compared with contrast venography in patients suspected of having deep venous thrombosis of the upper extremities. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 865-872.
• 9 Horattas MC. et al. Changing concepts of deep venous thrombosis of the upper extremity--report of a series and review of the literature. Surgery 1988; 104: 561-567.
• 10 Constans J. et al. Comparison of four clinical prediction scores for the diagnosis of lower limb deep venous thrombosis in outpatients. Am J Med 2003; 115: 436-440.
• 11 Constans J. et al. Clinical prediction of lower limb deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic hospitalized patients. Thromb Haemost 2001; 86: 985-990.
• 12 Wells PS. et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350: 1795-1798.
• 13 Wells PS. et al. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 1227-1235.
• 14 Merminod T. et al. Limited usefulness of D-dimer in suspected deep vein thrombosis of the upper extremities. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2006; 17: 225-226.
• 15 Laupacis A. et al. Clinical prediction rules. A review and suggested modifications of methodological standards. J Am Med Assoc 1997; 277: 488-494.
• 16 Sevestre MA. et al. Optimizing history taking for evaluating the risk of venous thromboembolism: the OPTIMEV study. J Mal Vasc 2005; 30: 217-227.
• 17 Baxter GM. The role of ultrasound in deep venous thrombosis. Clin Radiol 1997; 52: 1-3.
• 18 Schmittling ZC. et al. Characterization and probability of upper extremity deep venous thrombosis. Ann Vasc Surg 2004; 18: 552-557.