Thromb Haemost 2006; 96(04): 413-416
DOI: 10.1160/TH06-08-0445
Theme Issue Article
Schattauer GmbH

Does a coxib-associated thrombotic risk limit the clinical use of the compounds as analgesic, antiinflammatory drugs?

Arguments against
Artur-Aron Weber
1   Institut für Pharmakologie und Klinische Pharmakologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
,
Thomas Hohlfeld
1   Institut für Pharmakologie und Klinische Pharmakologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
,
Sebastian Harder
2   Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Johann-Wolfgang Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 14 August 2006

Accepted after resubmission 28 August 2006

Publication Date:
29 November 2017 (online)

Summary

The issue of the risk-benefit assessment of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, as compared to traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs), is far from being resolved. These compounds need to be carefully re-evaluated in order to avoid hasty conclusions, as it happened when COX-2 inhibitors were introduced into clinical practice. Several arguments support the concept, that COX-2 inhibitors remain a valuable therapeutic option at least for selected patients.

 
  • References

  • 1 Wadman M. How doesa painkiller harm the heart?. Nature 2006; 441: 262.
  • 2 Grosser T, Fries S, FitzGerald G. Biological basis for the cardiovascular consequences of COX-2 inhibition: therapeutic challenges and opportunities. J Clin Invest 2006; 116: 4-15.
  • 3 De Witt. COX-2-selective inhibitors: the new super aspirins. Mol Pharmacol 1999; 55: 625-31.
  • 4 Dai C, Stafford RS, Alexander GC. National trends in cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor use since market release: non-selective diffusion of a selectively cost-effective innovation. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 171-7.
  • 5 Chan FK, Hung LC, Suen BY. et al. Celecoxib versus diclofenac and omeprazole in reducing the risk of recurrent ulcer bleeding in patients with arthritis. N EnglJ Med 2002; 347: 2104-10.
  • 6 Chan FK, LCT Hung, BY Suen. et al. Celecoxib versus diclofenac plus omeprazole in high-risk arthritis patients: Results of a randomized double-blind trial. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 1038-43.
  • 7 Scheinmann JM, Yeomans ND, Talley NJ. et al. Prevention of ulcers by esomeprazole in at-risk patients using non-selective NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 701-10.
  • 8 Solomon SD, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA. et al. for the Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib (APC) Study Investigators. Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1071-80.
  • 9 Bresalier RS, Sandler RS, Quan H. et al. for the Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on Vioxx (APPROVe) Trial Investigators. Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1092-102.
  • 10 Kearney PM, Baigent C, Godwin J. et al. Do selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors and traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs increase the risk of atherothrombosis? Meta-analysis of randomised trials. Br Med J 2006; 332: 1302-8.
  • 11 Mamdani M, Rochon P, Juurlink DN. et al. Effect of selective cyclooxygenase2 inhibitors and naproxen on short-term risk of acute myocardial infarction in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163: 481-6.
  • 12 Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Reilly M. et al. Patients exposed to rofecoxib and celecoxib have different odds of nonfatal myocardial infarction. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142: 157-64.
  • 13 Graham DJ, Campen D, Hui R. et al. Risk of acute myocardial infarction and sudden cardiac death in patients treated with cyclo-oxygenase 2 selective and non-selective non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: nested case-control study. Lancet 2005; 365: 475-81.
  • 14 Hippisley-Cox J, Coupoland C. Risk of myocardial infarction in patients taking cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors or conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: population based nested case-control analysis. Br Med J 2005; 330: 1366-70.
  • 15 Johnsen SP, Larsson H, Tarone RE. et al. Risk of hospitalization for myocardial infarction among users of rofecoxib, celecoxib, and other NSAIDs: a population-based case-control study. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 978-84.
  • 16 Farkouh ME, Kirshner H, Harrington RA. et al. on behalf of the TARGET Study Group. Comparison of lumiracoxib with naproxen and ibuprofen in the Thera- peutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial (TARGET), cardiovascular outcomes: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 675-84.
  • 17 Helin-Salmivaara A, Virtanen A, Vesalainen R. et al. NSAID use and the risk of hospitalization for first myocardial infarction in the general population: a nationwide case-control study from Finland. Eur HeartJ 2006; 27: 1657-63.
  • 18 Hawkey CJ, Hawkey GM, Everitt S. et al. Increased risk of myocardial infarction as first manifestation of ischaemic heart disease and nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2006; 61: 730-7.
  • 19 Fischer LM, Schlienger RG, Matter CM. et al. Dis-continuation of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy and risk of acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 2472-6.
  • 20 Smyth EM, Burke A, FitzFerald GA. Lipid-derived autacoids: Eisosanoids and platelet-activating factor. In: Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL. The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 11th ed.. McGraw-Hill; New York: 2005: 653-70.
  • 21 Catella-Lawson F, Reilly M, Kapoor SC. et al. Cyclooxygenase inhibitors and the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 1809-17.
  • 22 Fiorucci S, Distrutti E, de Lima OM. et al. Relative contribution of acetylated cyclooxgenase (COX)-2 and 5-lipoxygenase (LOX) in regulating gastric mucosal integrity and adaptation to aspirin. FASEB J 2003; 17: 1171-3.
  • 23 CAPRIE Steering Committee. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE). Lancet 1996; 348: 1329-39.