Synlett 2008(16): 2471-2474  
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1078055
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Direct Asymmetric Aldol Reaction Catalyzed by an Imidazolium-Tagged trans-4-Hydroxy-l-proline under Aqueous Biphasic Conditions

Marco Lombardo*a,b, Filippo Pasia, Srinivasan Easwara, Claudio Trombini*a,b
a Dipartimento di Chimica ‘G. Ciamician’, Università degli Studi di Bologna, via Selmi 2, 40126 Bologna, Italy
b Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale ‘La Chimica per l’Ambiente’, via delle Industrie 21/8, 30175 Marghera (VE), Italy
Fax: +39(051)2099456; e-Mail: marco.lombardo@unibo.it; e-Mail: claudio.trombini@unibo.it;
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Received 26 June 2008
Publikationsdatum:
12. September 2008 (online)

Abstract

Imidazolium-tagged trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline, recently reported by us as an efficient catalyst for the asymmetric cross-aldol reaction in [bmim][Tf2N], gives much better results in terms of catalytic activity and stereochemical performance under aqueous biphasic conditions, providing aldols with anti/syn ratios up to 98:2 and ee (anti) up to 99%. The peculiar solubility properties of imidazolium-tagged trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline ensure an efficient separation of the product from the catalyst and the recycling of trans-4-hydroxy-l-proline for five times without appreciable loss of catalytic activity and stereochemical performance.

    References and Notes

  • 1a List B. Tetrahedron  2002,  58:  5573 
  • 1b List B. Pojarliev P. Castello C. Org. Lett.  2001,  3:  573 
  • 1c List B. Synlett  2001,  1675 
  • 1d Notz W. List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2000,  122:  7386 
  • 1e List B. Lerner RA. Barbas CF. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2000,  122:  2395 
  • 2 Mukherjee S. Yang JW. Hoffmann S. List B. Chem. Rev.  2007,  107:  5471 
  • For a recent debate on the role of water in organocatalytic reactions, see:
  • 3a Blackmond DG. Armstrong A. Coombe V. Wells A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2007,  46:  3798 
  • 3b Hayashi H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2006,  45:  8103 
  • 3c Brogan AP. Dickerson TJ. Janda KD. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2006,  45:  8100 
  • 4a Aratake S. Itoh T. Okano T. Usui T. Shoji M. Hayashi Y. Chem. Commun.  2007,  2524 
  • 4b Mase N. Nakai Y. Ohara N. Yoda H. Takabe K. Tanaka F. Barbas CF. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2006,  128:  734 
  • 5a Maya V. Raj M. Singh VK. Org. Lett.  2007,  9:  2593 
  • 5b Guizzetti S. Benaglia M. Raimondi L. Celentano G. Org. Lett.  2007,  9:  1247 
  • 5c Wang C. Jiang Y. Zhang X.-X. Huang Y. Li B.-G. Zhang G.-L. Tetrahedron Lett.  2007,  48:  4281 
  • 5d Wu Y. Zhang Y. Yu M. Zhao G. Wang S. Org. Lett.  2006,  8:  4417 
  • 5e Fu Y.-Q. Li Z.-C. Ding L.-N. Tao J.-C. Zhang S.-H. Tang M.-S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2006,  17:  3351 
  • 6a Font D. Sayalero S. Bastero A. Jimeno C. Pericàs MA. Org. Lett.  2008,  10:  337 
  • 6b Aratake S. Itoh T. Okano T. Nagae N. Sumiya T. Shoji M. Hayashi Y. Chem. Eur. J.  2007,  13:  10246 
  • 6c Huang J. Zhang X. Armstrong DW. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2007,  46:  9073 
  • 6d Hayashi Y. Sumiya T. Takahashi J. Gotoh H. Urushima T. Shoji M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2006,  45:  958 
  • 6e Hayashi Y. Aratake S. Okano T. Takahashi J. Sumiya T. Shoji M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2006,  45:  5527 
  • 6f Font D. Jimeno C. Pericàs MA. Org. Lett.  2006,  8:  4653 
  • 7 Zotova N. Franzke A. Armstrong A. Blackmond D.
    J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2007,  129:  15100 
  • 8 Jung Y. Marcus RA. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2007,  129:  5492 
  • 9 Miao W. Chan TH. Acc. Chem. Res.  2006,  39:  897 
  • 10a Li C.-J. Chem. Rev.  2005,  105:  3095 
  • 10b Lindström UM. Chem. Rev.  2002,  102:  2751 
  • 11a Weingärtner H. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2008,  47:  654 
  • 11b Parvulescu VI. Hardacre C. Chem. Rev.  2007,  107:  2615 
  • 11c Chowdhury S. Mohan RS. Scott JL. Tetrahedron  2007,  63:  2363 
  • 11d Welton T. Chem. Rev.  1999,  99:  2071 
  • 12 Miao W. Chan TH. Adv. Synth. Catal.  2006,  348:  1711 
  • 13 Lombardo M. Pasi F. Easwar S. Trombini C. Adv. Synth. Catal.  2007,  349:  2061 
  • 14 Zhou L. Wang L. Chem. Lett.  2007,  36:  628 
  • 15 Siyutkin DE. Kucherenko AS. Struchkova MI. Zlotin SG. Tetrahedron Lett.  2008,  49:  1212 
16

General Procedure for Cross-Aldol Condensation of Aromatic Aldehydes (Table 1, entry 1) Catalyst 1b (13.4 mg, 0.025 mmol) was stirred in H2O
(0.8 mL) until a clear solution was obtained. Cyclohexanone (0.259 mL, 2.5 mmol) was added and the mixture was stirred for 20 min whereupon the reaction mixture became an emulsion. 4-Nitrobenzaldehyde (75.5 mg, 0.5 mmol) was then added, and the reaction mixture was allowed to stir for a further 24 h at 25 ˚C. Cyclohexanone and water were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was extracted with Et2O (4 × 3 mL). The combined organic extracts were dried over Na2SO4, concentrated in vacuo, and purified by silica gel column chromatography (cyclohexane-EtOAc, 7:3) to obtain the pure anti-aldol adduct in 93% yield and the syn-adduct in 4%.

17

General Procedure for Cross-Aldol Condensation of Aliphatic Aldehydes (Table 3, entry 5) Catalyst 1b (26.8 mg, 0.05 mmol) was dissolved in cyclohexanone (0.259 mL, 2.5 mmol), H2O was added (0.012 mL), and the solution was stirred for 10 min before the addition of isobutyraldehyde (0.046 mL, 0.5 mmol). The reaction mixture was allowed to stir for a further 72 h at 25 ˚C. Cyclohexanone and water were removed under reduced pressure and the residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (cyclohexane-EtOAc, 9:1) to afford the pure anti-aldol adduct in 60% yield.

18

General Procedure for the Recycling Experiment (Table 4)
The recycling studies were performed using the same procedure reported above on a 1 mmol scale of 4-nitro-benzaldehyde. After completion of the workup, the reaction flask was dried under vacuum for 1 h and recharged with H2O and the starting substrates.