PDF herunterladen
Endoscopy 2008; 40(10): 843-848
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077570
DDW highlights

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Colon tumors and colonoscopy

L.  Hol1 , M.  E.  van Leerdam1
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
30. September 2008 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the Western world. Detection of CRC at an early stage improves the prognosis considerably. Furthermore, adenomas are the benign precursors of CRC, and removal of adenomas results in a lower than expected incidence of CRC. For these reasons, the detection and identification of colonic neoplasms was an important topic during the 2008 Digestive Disease Week (DDW).

References

  • 1 Taber A, Romagnuolo J. Simply recording colonoscopy withdrawal time increases polyp detection rate.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB80-AB81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Weiser K T, Butterly L F, Toor A. et al . Changing colonoscopy performance to meet the quality indicator of withdrawal time: results of a clinic-based improvement intervention.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB78
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Chan M Y, Cohen H, Spiegel B M. Does the first colonoscopy of the day yield more polyps than cases performed later?.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Zauber A G, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Wilschut J. et al . Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopy is the most likely screening strategy to offset escalating treatment costs.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bokemeyer B, Rambow A, Hüppe D. et al . Screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer prevention– results from a German online registry on 269 000 cases.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Gellad Z F, Almirall D, Provenzale D. et al . Time from positive screening fecal occult blood test to colonoscopy and risk of neoplasia.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Leung W K, Lau J Y, Suen B. et al . Colonoscopic screening at 5-year after initial examination in average risk subjects: a prospective study.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A88
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Martinez M E, Schatzkin A, Baron J A. et al . Advanced colorectal neoplasia following polypectomy: a pooled analysis.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Robertson D J, Lieberman D A, Winawer S J. et al . Interval cancer after total colonoscopy: results from a pooled analysis of eight studies.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ho S B, Krinsky M L. Quality polyp resection in colonoscopy: are we achieving polyp clearance?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB79-AB80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gross S A, Buchner A M, Cangemi J R. et al . A prospective randomized back-to-back trial comparing narrow band imaging to conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Adler A, Yenerim T, Aschenbeck J. et al . Narrow band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for screening colonoscopy in a private practice setting–a large prospective randomized trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB100-AB101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Rogart J N, Siddiqui U D, Jain D. et al . Narrow band imaging without high magnification to differentiate polyps during real-time colonoscopy: improvement with experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mayinger B, Neumann F, Kastner C L. et al . Early detection of pre-malignant conditions in the colon by fluorescence endoscopy using local sensitization with hexaminolevulinate (Hal).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Pellise M, Fernandez-Esparrach G, Cardenas A. et al . Clinical impact of wide-angle, high-resolution endoscopy in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia in a non-selected population: a prospective randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Waye J D, Heigh R I, Fleischer D E. et al . A prospective efficacy evaluation of the third eye retroscope auxiliary endoscopy system.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB101-AB102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Benson M E, Dureja P, Gopal D V. et al . A comparison of overall adenoma detection and recovery rate of optical colonoscopy and CT colonography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rex D K, Overhiser A, Chen S. American College of Radiology (ACR) recommendations for CT colonography (CTC) interpretation: implications for resection of high risk adenoma findings.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB105-AB106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kessler W A, Klein R W, Wielage R C. et al . Cost savings of removing diminutive polyps without histologic assessment.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Gellad Z F. Colonoscopy withdrawal time and risk of neoplasia on follow-up colonoscopy: results from VA Cooperative Study Program 380.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lin O. The effect of periodic monitoring on screening colonoscopy withdrawal times, polyp detection rates and patient satisfaction scores.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sinn D H. Documentation of withdrawal time improves adenoma detection during colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cury M S. Effect of institution-wide policy of colonoscopy withdrawal time   7 minutes on polyp detection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Benson M E. Factors that influence colonoscopic technique and adenoma detection rates at an academic gastroenterology unit.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB294-AB295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Francis G A. Time of day as a risk factor for incomplete colonoscopy: an Australian tertiary referral hospital experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB287
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 El-Serag H B. Determinants and effect of lag time before colorectal cancer diagnosis.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fisher D A. Time to diagnosis of colorectal cancer in the VA system.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Yen R. Ethnic differences in findings on screening colonoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Kerman D. A prospective study of the prevalence of colorectal adenomas in Hispanic immigrants referred for screening colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB313-AB314
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Weed M T. Medicaid patients with colorectal cancer are rarely diagnosed by screening colonoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Abdelsayed G. Who are we missing in colorectal cancer screening?.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A160
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Rathgaber S W. Repeat colonoscopy guideline adherence following screening and surveillance exams in a community gastroenterology practice?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB236-AB237
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Laiyemo A O. The continued follow up study of the Polyp Prevention Trial: a prospective study of utilization and yield of surveillance colonoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Leung K. The Polyp Prevention Trial Continued Follow-Up Study (PPT-CFS): ongoing colorectal cancer risk despite surveillance colonoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Krinsky M L. Dysplasia detection of colonic polyps and polypectomy sites using an Optical Biopsy™ system.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Inoue T. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB302-AB303
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Suzuki H. Novel optical imaging techniques for diagnosis of colorectal adenoma–a prospective case study on detection of colorectal adenomas using AFI compared with NBI.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB185-AB186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Wada Y. The diagnosis of colorectal lesions with magnifying narrow band imaging (NBI) system.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB311-AB312
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Reese G E. Diagnostic Precision of narrow band imaging (NBI) versus chromoendoscopy for lesion characterization at colonoscopy: a meta analysis.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Stipho S. The clinical utility of high definition magnification endoscopy with and without narrow band imaging for detection of colonic neoplasia.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ko , BM . Comparison with narrow band imaging(NBI) magnification and histology finding in colorectal neoplasms.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB126
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Patel K. The intra and inter observer variability of narrow band imaging to differentiate hyperplastic versus adenomatous polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Fukuzawa M. Can magnification narrow-band imaging (NBI) colonoscopy determine invasion depth of early colorectal cancer?–A prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB122-AB123
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Hiraga Y. Clinical usefulness of NBI magnification in routine colonoscopic examination.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Sasajima K. Efficacy of narrow band imaging magnification for microvessel pattern of colorectal lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Suzuki H. Novel optical imaging techniques for diagnosis of colorectal adenoma–a prospective case study on detection of colorectal adenomas using AFI compared with NBI.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB308-AB309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Aihara H. Clinical significance of image-enhanced endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging (AFI) observations in differentiation between colonic neoplastic lesions and non-neoplastic lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Haringsma J. Wide-angle colonoscopy significantly improves polyp detection rate.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Randolph A C. Polyp detection rates do increase with the use of high definition, wide-angle colonoscopes.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Pohl J. A prospective randomized multicenter study on the Fujinon Intelligent Colour Enhancement (FICE) system versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: what is the impact of novel optical imaging techniques on polyp detection rates?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB101
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Burgos H. Correlation of Fujinon FICE endoscopic imaging and histopathological findings in colorectal adenomas.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Bianchi L K. High-definition endoscopy improves adenoma detection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB305-AB306
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Buchner A M. Does the use of high definition white light colonoscopy lead to higher adenoma detection rates compared to standard definition white light colonoscopy? An effectiveness study in 1225 patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Hoffman A. High definition colonoscopy (HD +) with I-Scan function allows to recognize and characterize flat neoplastic changes as precisely as chromoendoscopy.   Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  67 AB125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Kupfer A. Factors associated with advanced histology in small colonic polyps in a racially diverse population.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A183
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Chaves D M, Nakao F S, Sugai B M. et al . Prevalence of low and high grade diminutive adenomas in patients submitted to routine colonoscopy.  Gastroenterology. 2008;  134 A186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

M. E. van LeerdamMD, PhD 

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Erasmus MC University Medical Center

P.O. Box 2040
3000 CA, Rotterdam
The Netherlands

Fax: +31-10-7034682

eMail: m.vanleerdam@erasmusmc.nl