PDF herunterladen
Semin Speech Lang 2008; 29(1): 032-043
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1061623
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Effects of Semantic Impairment on Language Processing in Semantic Dementia

Jamie Reilly1 , 2 , Jonathan E. Peelle3
  • 1Departments of Neurology and Communicative Disorders, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
  • 2Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Affairs Hospital, Gainesville, Florida
  • 3Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
28. April 2008 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

Semantic dementia is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive loss of conceptual and lexical knowledge. Cortical atrophy remains relatively isolated to anterior and inferior portions of the temporal lobe early in semantic dementia, later affecting more extensive regions of temporal cortex. Throughout much of the disease course, frontal and parietal lobe structures remain relatively intact. This distribution of cortical damage produces a unique language profile. Patients with semantic dementia typically experience profound deficits in language comprehension and production in the context of relatively well-preserved functioning in domains such as phonology, executive function, visuospatial processing, and speech perception. We discuss the effects of semantic impairment on language processing in semantic dementia within the context of an interactive theory of semantic cognition that assumes the active coordination of modality-neutral and modality-specific components. Finally, we argue the need for an etiology-specific language intervention for this population.

KEYWORDS

Dementia - language - semantic memory - semantic dementia

REFERENCES

  • 1 Hebert L E, Scherr P A, Bienias D A, Evans D A. Annual incidence of Alzheimer's disease in the United States projected to the years 2000 through 2050.  Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2001;  15 169-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gorno-Tempini M L, Dronkers N F, Rankin K P et al.. Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia.  Ann Neurol. 2004;  55 335-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Hodges J R, Davies R R, Xuereb J H et al.. Clinicopathological correlates in frontotemporal dementia.  Ann Neurol. 2004;  56 399-406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hodges J R, Patterson K. Nonfluent progressive aphasia and semantic dementia: a comparative neuropsychological study.  J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996;  2 511-524
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hodges J R, Patterson K, Oxbury S, Funnell E. Semantic dementia: progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy.  Brain. 1992;  115 1783-1806
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Neary D, Snowden J S, Gustafson L et al.. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: a consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria.  Neurology. 1998;  51 1546-1554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Peelle J E, Grossman M. Language processing in frontotemporal dementia: a brief review.  Language and Linguistics Compass. 2008;  2 18-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Warrington E K. The selective impairment of semantic memory.  Q J Exp Psychol. 1975;  27 635-657
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Mesulam M. Slowly progressive aphasia without generalized dementia.  Ann Neurol. 1982;  11 592-598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Mesulam M. Primary progressive aphasia: a language-based dementia.  N Engl J Med. 2003;  349 1535-1542
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Snowden J S, Goulding P J, Neary D. Semantic dementia: a form of circumscribed cerebral atrophy.  Behav Neurol. 1989;  2 167-182
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Galton C J, Patterson K, Graham K et al.. Differing patterns of temporal atrophy in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia.  Neurology. 2001;  57 216-225
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mummery C J, Patterson K, Price C J, Ashburner J, Frackowiak R SJ, Hodges J R. A voxel-based morphometry study of semantic dementia: relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic memory.  Ann Neurol. 2000;  47 36-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Lambon Ralph M A, McClelland J L, Patterson K, Galton C J, Hodges J R. No right to speak? The relationship between object naming and semantic impairment: neuropsychological evidence and a computational model.  J Cogn Neurosci. 2001;  13 341-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Graham K S, Patterson K, Hodges J R. Episodic memory: new insights from the study of semantic dementia.  Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;  9 245-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Harasty J A, Halliday G M, Kril J J, Code C. Specific temporoparietal gyral atrophy reflects the pattern of language dissolution in Alzheimer's disease.  Brain. 1999;  122 675-686
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 van de Pol L A, Hensel A, van der Flier W M et al.. Hippocampal atrophy on MRI in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer's disease.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;  77 439-442
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Halpern C H, Glosser G, Clark R et al.. Dissociation of numbers and objects in corticobasal degeneration and semantic dementia.  Neurology. 2004;  62 1163-1169
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Jefferies E, Patterson K, Lambon Ralph M A. The natural history of late-stage “pure” semantic dementia.  Neurocase. 2006;  12 1-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Reilly J, Cross K, Troiani V, Grossman M. Single word semantic judgments in semantic dementia: do phonology and grammatical class count?.  Aphasiology. 2007;  21 558-569
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Farah M J. The neurological basis of mental imagery: a computational analysis.  Cognition. 1984;  18 245-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Humphreys G W, Forde E ME. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “category-specific” neuropsychological deficits.  Behav Brain Sci. 2001;  24 453-509
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Humphreys G W, Riddoch M J. Features, objects, action: the cognitive neuropsychology of visual object processing, 1984-2004.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006;  23 156-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Caramazza A, Mahon B Z. The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits.  Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;  7 354-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Geschwind N. Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man.  Brain. 1965;  88 237-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Farah M J, McClelland J L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity.  J Exp Psychol. 1991;  120 339-357
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Humphreys G W, Riddoch M J. A case series analysis of “category-specific” deficits of living things: the HIT account.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003;  20 263-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Martin A, Chao L L. Semantic memory and the brain: structure and processes.  Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001;  11 194-201
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Mesulam M. Primary progressive aphasia.  Ann Neurol. 2001;  49 425-432
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph M A, Patterson K, Garrard P, Hodges J R. Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia.  Neuropsychologia. 2000;  38 1207-1215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph M A, Patterson K, Hodges J R. When objects lose their meaning: what happens to their use?.  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2002;  2 236-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Coccia M, Bartolini M, Luzzi S, Provinciali L, Lambon Ralph M A. Semantic memory is an amodal, dynamic system: evidence from the interaction of naming and object use in semantic dementia.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004;  21 513-527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Buxbaum L J, Schwartz M F, Carew T G. The role of semantic memory in object use.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1997;  14 219-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Bussey T J, Saksida L M. The organization of visual object representations: a connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex.  Eur J Neurosci. 2002;  15 355-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Tyler L K, Stamatakis E A, Bright P et al.. Processing objects at different levels of specificity.  J Cogn Neurosci. 2004;  16 351-362
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Moss H E, Rodd J M, Stamatakis E A, Bright P, Tyler L K. Anteromedial temporal cortex supports fine-grained differentiation among objects.  Cereb Cortex. 2005;  15 616-627
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Grossman M, Ash S. Primary progressive aphasia: a review.  Neurocase. 2004;  10 3-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hodges J R, Graham N, Patterson K. Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organisation of semantic memory.  Memory. 1995;  3 463-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Hodges J R. Semantic dementia: disorder of semantic memory. In: D'Esposito M Neurological Foundations of Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press 2003: 67-87
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Bird H, Lambon Ralph M A, Patterson K, Hodges J R. The rise and fall of frequency and imageability: noun and verb production in semantic dementia.  Brain Lang. 2000;  73 17-49
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph M A, Graham K S et al.. A duck with four legs: Investigating the structure of conceptual knowledge using picture drawing in semantic dementia.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003;  20 27-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Funnell E. Evidence for scripts in semantic dementia: implications for theories of semantic memory.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2001;  18 323-341
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Cipolotti L, Warrington E K. Semantic memory and reading abilities: a case report.  J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1995;  1 104-110
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Moss H E, Tyler L K, Hodges J R, Patterson K. Exploring the loss of semantic memory in semantic dementia: evidence from a primed monitoring study.  Neuropsychology. 1995;  9 16-26
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Hodges J R, Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph M A, Patterson K, Spatt J. The role of conceptual knowledge in object use: evidence from semantic dementia.  Brain. 2000;  123 1913-1925
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Graham K S, Simons J S, Pratt K H, Patterson K, Hodges J R. Insights from semantic dementia on the relationship between episodic and semantic memory.  Neuropsychologia. 2000;  38 313-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Lambon Ralph M A, Graham K S, Patterson K, Hodges J R. Is a picture worth a thousand words? Evidence from concept definitions by patients with semantic dementia.  Brain Lang. 1999;  70 309-335
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Patterson K. The reign of typicality in semantic memory. Philos Trans Roy Soc B.  Biol Sci. 2007;  362 813-821
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Rogers T T, Hocking J, Noppeney U et al.. Anterior temporal cortex and semantic memory: reconciling findings from neuropsychology and functional imaging.  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2006;  6 201-213
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Snowden J S, Griffiths H, Neary D. Semantic dementia: autobiographical contribution to preservation of meaning.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1994;  11 265-292
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Kiran S, Bassetto G. Evaluating the effectiveness of semantic based treatment for naming deficits in aphasia: what works?.  Semin Speech Lang. 2008;  29 71-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Barsalou L W, Simmons W K, Barbey A K, Wilson C D. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems.  Trends Cogn Sci. 2003;  7 84-91
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Pecher D, Zeelenberg R, Barsalou L W. Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: modality-specific effects of prior activation.  Psychon Bull Rev. 2004;  11 164-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Simmons W K, Barsalou L W. The similarity-in-topography principle: reconciling theories of conceptual deficits.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2003;  20 451-486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Simmons W K, Martin A, Barsalou L W. Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward.  Cereb Cortex. 2005;  15 1602-1608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Martin A, Wiggs C L, Ungerleider L G, Haxby J V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge.  Nature. 1996;  379 649-652
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Pulvermuller F. Brain mechanisms linking language and action.  Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;  6 576-582
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Jefferies E, Lambon Ralph M A. Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: a case-series comparison.  Brain. 2006;  129 2132-2147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Rogers T T, Hodges J R, Lambon Ralph M A, Patterson K. Object recognition under semantic impairment: the effects of conceptual regularities on perceptual decisions.  Lang Cogn Process. 2003;  18 625-662
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Rogers T T, Lambon Ralph M A, Garrard P et al.. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.  Psychol Rev. 2004;  111 205-235
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Reilly J, Peelle J, Grossman M. A unitary semantics account of reverse concreteness effects in semantic dementia.  Brain Lang. 2007;  103 86-87
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Kroll J F, Merves J S. Lexical access for concrete and abstract words. J Exp Psychol Learning Memory.  Cognition. 1986;  12 92-107
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Walker I, Hulme C. Concrete words are easier to recall than abstract words: evidence for a semantic contribution to short-term serial recall.  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999;  25 1256-1271
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Reilly J, Chrysikou E, Ramey C H. Support for hybrid models of the age of acquisition of English nouns.  Psychon Bull Rev. 2007;  20(6) 1164-1170
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Sadoski M, Paivio A. Imagery and Text: A Dual Coding Theory of Reading and Writing. Mahwah, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum 2001
    Google Scholar
  • 66 Paivio A. Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. New York, NY; Oxford University Press 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 67 Breedin S D, Saffran E M, Coslett H B. Reversal of the concreteness effect in a patient with semantic dementia.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1994;  11 617-660
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Yi H, Moore P, Grossman M. Reversal of the concreteness effect for verbs in semantic dementia.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2007;  21 1-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Grossman M. Frontotemporal dementia: a review.  J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2002;  8 566-583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Grossman M, McMillan C, Moore P et al.. What's in a name: voxel-based morphometric analyses of MRI and naming difficulty in Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal degeneration.  Brain. 2004;  127 628-649
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Snowden J S, Neary D. Relearning of verbal labels in semantic dementia.  Neuropsychologia. 2002;  40 1715-1728
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Goodglass H, Kaplan E. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA; Lea and Feibiger 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 73 Ash S, Moore P, Antani S, McCawley G, Work M, Grossman M. Trying to tell a tale: discourse impairments in progressive aphasia and frontotemporal dementia.  Neurology. 2006;  66 1405-1413
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Kwok S, Reilly J, Grossman M. Acoustic-phonetic processing in semantic dementia.  Brain Lang. 2006;  99 145-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Reilly J, Grossman M. Language processing in dementia. In: Budson A, Kowell N Alzheimer's Disease and Associated Disorders. Edinburgh, Scotland; Blackwell Synergy Press In press
    Google Scholar
  • 76 Reilly J, Martin N, Grossman M. Effects of semantic impairment on repetition and verbal short-term memory: evidence from semantic dementia.  Brain Lang. 2004;  91 140-141
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Reilly J, Martin N, Grossman M. Verbal learning in semantic dementia: is repetition priming a useful strategy?.  Aphasiology. 2005;  19 329-339
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Kelly M H. Using sound to solve syntactic problems: the role of phonology in grammatical category assignments.  Psychol Rev. 1992;  99 349-364
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Reilly J, Kean J. Formal distinctiveness of high- and low-imageability nouns: analyses and theoretical implications.  Cogn Sci. 2007;  31 1-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Patterson K, Lambon Ralph M A, Jefferies E et al.. “Presemantic” cognition in semantic dementia: six deficits in search of an explanation.  J Cogn Neurosci. 2006;  18 169-183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Patterson K, Lambon Ralph M A. Selective disorders of reading?.  Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999;  9 235-239
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Blazely A M, Coltheart M, Casey B J. Semantic impairment with and without surface dyslexia: implications for models of reading.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005;  22 695-717
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Shallice T, Warrington E K, McCarthy R. Reading without semantics.  Q J Exp Psychol A. 1983;  35A 111-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Coltheart M. Deep dyslexia is right-hemisphere reading.  Brain Lang. 2000;  71 299-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Coltheart M, Rastle K, Perry C, Langdon R, Ziegler J. DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.  Psychol Rev. 2001;  108 204-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Jokel R, Rochon E, Leonard C. Treating anomia in semantic dementia: Improvement, maintenance, or both?.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2006;  16 241-256
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Jamie ReillyPh.D. 

Departments of Neurology & Communicative Disorders, University of Florida

P.O. Box 100174, Gainesville, FL 32610

eMail: jjreilly@phhp.ufl.edu