PDF herunterladen
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2007; 11(4): 322-334
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1060335
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Pediatric Musculoskeletal Nuclear Medicine

Jason J. Ma1 , Bobby K. Kang1 , S. Ted Treves1 , 2
  • 1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 2Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
07. März 2008 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the current role of nuclear medicine in common benign and malignant pediatric musculoskeletal conditions and discusses future applications.

KEYWORDS

Musculoskeletal - nuclear medicine - radiology - imaging - pediatrics - PET - multimodality

REFERENCES

  • 1 Christensen S B, Krogsgaard O W. Localization of Tc-99m MDP in epiphyseal growth plates of rats.  J Nucl Med. 1981;  22(3) 237-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Cawley K A, Dvorak A D, Wilmot M D. Normal anatomic variant: scintigraphy of the ischiopubic synchondrosis.  J Nucl Med. 1983;  24(1) 14-16
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Kloiber R, Udjus K, McIntyre W, Jarvis J. The scintigraphic and radiographic appearance of the ischiopubic synchondroses in normal children and in osteomyelitis.  Pediatr Radiol. 1988;  18(1) 57-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Matheson G O, Clement D B, McKenzie D C, Taunton J E, Lloyd-Smith D R, MacIntyre J G. Stress fractures in athletes. A study of 320 cases.  Am J Sports Med. 1987;  15(1) 46-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Anderson M W, Greenspan A. Stress fractures.  Radiology. 1996;  199(1) 1-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bellah R D, Summerville D A, Treves S T, Micheli L J. Low-back pain in adolescent athletes: detection of stress injury to the pars interarticularis with SPECT.  Radiology. 1991;  180(2) 509-512
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Rupani H D, Holder L E, Espinola D A, Engin S I. Three-phase radionuclide bone imaging in sports medicine.  Radiology. 1985;  156(1) 187-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Wigh R E. The thoracolumbar and lumbosacral transitional junctions.  Spine. 1980;  5(3) 215-222
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wigh R E. The transitional lumbosacral osseous complex.  Skeletal Radiol. 1982;  8(2) 127-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Swischuk L E, John S D, Tschoepe E J. Upper tibial hyperextension fractures in infants: another occult toddler's fracture.  Pediatr Radiol. 1999;  29(1) 6-9
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Starshak R J, Simons G W, Sty J R. Occult fracture of the calcaneus-another toddler's fracture.  Pediatr Radiol. 1984;  14(1) 37-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Blumberg K, Patterson R J. The toddler's cuboid fracture.  Radiology. 1991;  179(1) 93-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Miller J H, Sanderson R A. Scintigraphy of toddler's fracture.  J Nucl Med. 1988;  29(12) 2001-2003
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Park H M, Kernek C B, Robb J A. Early scintigraphic findings of occult femoral and tibial fractures in infants.  Clin Nucl Med. 1988;  13(4) 271-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Treves S, Khettry J, Broker F H, Wilkinson R H, Watts H. Osteomyelitis: early scintigraphic detection in children.  Pediatrics. 1976;  57(2) 173-186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Nade S. Acute haematogenous osteomyelitis in infancy and childhood.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1983;  65(2) 109-119
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Faden H, Grossi M. Acute osteomyelitis in children. Reassessment of etiologic agents and their clinical characteristics.  Am J Dis Child. 1991;  145(1) 65-69
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Asmar B I. Osteomyelitis in the neonate.  Infect Dis Clin North Am. 1992;  6(1) 117-132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Schauwecker D S. The scintigraphic diagnosis of osteomyelitis.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;  158(1) 9-18
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Aronson J, Garvin K, Seibert J, Glasier C, Tursky E A. Efficiency of the bone scan for occult limping toddlers.  J Pediatr Orthop. 1992;  12(1) 38-44
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Howie D W, Savage J P, Wilson T G, Paterson D. The technetium phosphate bone scan in the diagnosis of osteomyelitis in childhood.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;  65(4) 431-437
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Mok P M, Reilly B J, Ash J M. Osteomyelitis in the neonate. Clinical aspects and the role of radiography and scintigraphy in diagnosis and management.  Radiology. 1982;  145(3) 677-682
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kocher M S, Zurakowski D, Kasser J R. Differentiating between septic arthritis and transient synovitis of the hip in children: an evidence-based clinical prediction algorithm.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;  81(12) 1662-1670
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Bensahel H, Bok B, Cavailloles F, Csukonyi Z. Bone scintigraphy in Perthes disease.  J Pediatr Orthop. 1983;  3(3) 302-305
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Calver R, Venugopal V, Dorgan J, Bentley G, Gimlette T. Radionuclide scanning in the early diagnosis of Perthes' disease.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1981;  63-B(3) 379-382
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sutherland A D, Savage J P, Paterson D C, Foster B K. The nuclide bone-scan in the diagnosis and management of Perthes' disease.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;  62(3) 300-306
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cavailloles F, Bok B, Bensahel H. Bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis and follow up of Perthes' disease.  Eur J Nucl Med. 1982;  7(7) 327-330
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Sebag G H. Disorders of the hip.  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1998;  6(3) 627-641
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Comte F, De Rosa V, Zekri H et al.. Confirmation of the early prognostic value of bone scanning and pinhole imaging of the hip in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.  J Nucl Med. 2003;  44(11) 1761-1766
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lisbona R, Rosenthall L. Role of radionuclide imaging in osteoid osteoma.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1979;  132(1) 77-80
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Roach P J, Connolly L P, Zurakowski D, Treves S T. Osteoid osteoma: comparative utility of high-resolution planar and pinhole magnification scintigraphy.  Pediatr Radiol. 1996;  26(3) 222-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Papagelopoulos P J, Mavrogenis A F, Kyriakopoulos C K et al.. Radiofrequency ablation of intra-articular osteoid osteoma of the hip.  J Int Med Res. 2006;  34(5) 537-544
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sty J, Simons G. Intraoperative 99m technetium bone imaging in the treatment of benign osteoblastic tumors.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;  (165) 223-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Kirks D R, Taybi H, Histiocytosis X. St. Louis; Mosby 1977
  • 35 Dogan A S, Conway J J, Miller J H, Grier D, Bhattathiry M M, Mitchell C S. Detection of bone lesions in Langerhans cell histiocytosis: complementary roles of scintigraphy and conventional radiography.  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1996;  18(1) 51-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Youmans D C, Don S, Hildebolt C, Shackelford G D, Luker G D, McAlister W H. Skeletal surveys for child abuse: comparison of interpretation using digitized images and screen-film radiographs.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;  171(5) 1415-1419
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Tung G A, Kumar M, Richardson R C, Jenny C, Brown W D. Comparison of accidental and nonaccidental traumatic head injury in children on noncontrast computed tomography.  Pediatrics. 2006;  118(2) 626-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sty J R, Starshak R J. The role of bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of the suspected abused child.  Radiology. 1983;  146(2) 369-375
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Jaudes P K. Comparison of radiography and radionuclide bone scanning in the detection of child abuse.  Pediatrics. 1984;  73(2) 166-168
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Haase G M, Ortiz V N, Sfakianakis G N, Morse T S. The value of radionuclide bone scanning in the early recognition of deliberate child abuse.  J Trauma. 1980;  20(10) 873-875
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Aoki J, Watanabe H, Shinozaki T et al.. FDG PET of primary benign and malignant bone tumors: standardized uptake value in 52 lesions.  Radiology. 2001;  219(3) 774-777
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Goodin G S, Shulkin B L, Kaufman R A, McCarville M B. PET/CT characterization of fibroosseous defects in children: 18F-FDG uptake can mimic metastatic disease.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  187(4) 1124-1128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Rees C R, Siddiqui A R, duCret R. The role of bone scintigraphy in osteogenic sarcoma.  Skeletal Radiol. 1986;  15(5) 365-367
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Goldstein H, McNeil B J, Zufall E, Jaffe N, Treves S. Changing indications for bone scintigraphy in patients with osteosarcoma.  Radiology. 1980;  135(1) 177-180
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Brenner W, Bohuslavizki K H, Eary J F. PET imaging of osteosarcoma.  J Nucl Med. 2003;  44(6) 930-942
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 McCarville M B, Christie R, Daw N C, Spunt S L, Kaste S C. PET/CT in the evaluation of childhood sarcomas.  AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  184(4) 1293-1304
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Aboulafia A J, Malawer M M. Surgical management of pelvic and extremity osteosarcoma.  Cancer. 1993;  71(10, suppl) 3358-3366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Gyorke T, Zajic T, Lange A et al.. Impact of FDG PET for staging of Ewing sarcomas and primitive neuroectodermal tumours.  Nucl Med Commun. 2006;  27(1) 17-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Shulkin B L, Shapiro B, Hutchinson R J. Iodine-131-metaiodobenzylguanidine and bone scintigraphy for the detection of neuroblastoma.  J Nucl Med. 1992;  33(10) 1735-1740
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Hadj-Djilani N L, Lebtahi N E, Delaloye A B, Laurini R, Beck D. Diagnosis and follow-up of neuroblastoma by means of iodine-123 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy and bone scan, and the influence of histology.  Eur J Nucl Med. 1995;  22(4) 322-329
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Kushner B H. Neuroblastoma: a disease requiring a multitude of imaging studies.  J Nucl Med. 2004;  45(7) 1172-1188
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Friedberg J W, Fischman A, Neuberg D et al.. FDG-PET is superior to gallium scintigraphy in staging and more sensitive in the follow-up of patients with de novo Hodgkin lymphoma: a blinded comparison.  Leuk Lymphoma. 2004;  45(1) 85-92
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Yamamoto F, Tsukamoto E, Nakada K et al.. 18F-FDG PET is superior to 67Ga SPECT in the staging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.  Ann Nucl Med. 2004;  18(6) 519-526
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Rini J N, Nunez R, Nichols K et al.. Coincidence-detection FDG-PET versus gallium in children and young adults with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's disease.  Pediatr Radiol. 2005;  35(2) 169-178
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Lin P, Chu J, Kneebone A et al.. Direct comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose coincidence gamma camera tomography with gallium scanning for the staging of lymphoma.  Intern Med J. 2005;  35(2) 91-96
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Jhanwar Y S, Straus D J. The role of PET in lymphoma.  J Nucl Med. 2006;  47(8) 1326-1334
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Schulte M, Brecht-Krauss D, Heymer B et al.. Grading of tumors and tumorlike lesions of bone: evaluation by FDG PET.  J Nucl Med. 2000;  41(10) 1695-1701
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Franzius C, Bielack S, Flege S, Sciuk J, Jurgens H, Schober O. Prognostic significance of (18)F-FDG and (99m)Tc-methylene diphosphonate uptake in primary osteosarcoma.  J Nucl Med. 2002;  43(8) 1012-1017
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Rini J N, Palestro C J. Imaging of infection and inflammation with 18F-FDG-labeled leukocytes.  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;  50(2) 143-146
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Stumpe K D, Strobel K. 18F FDG-PET imaging in musculoskeletal infection.  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;  50(2) 131-142
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Vos F J, Bleeker-Rovers C P, Corstens F H, Kullberg B J, Oyen W J. FDG-PET for imaging of non-osseous infection and inflammation.  Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;  50(2) 121-130
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Green J R, Reeve J, Tellez M, Veall N, Wootton R. Skeletal blood flow in metabolic disorders of the skeleton.  Bone. 1987;  8(5) 293-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Nahmias C, Cockshott W P, Belbeck L W, Garnett E S. Measurement of absolute bone blood flow by positron emission tomography.  Skeletal Radiol. 1986;  15(3) 198-200
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Grynpas M D. Fluoride effects on bone crystals.  J Bone Miner Res. 1990;  5(suppl 1) S169-S175
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Even-Sapir E. Imaging of malignant bone involvement by morphologic, scintigraphic, and hybrid modalities.  J Nucl Med. 2005;  46(8) 1356-1367
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Silva M J, Uthgenannt B A, Rutlin J R, Wohl G R, Lewis J S, Welch M J. In vivo skeletal imaging of 18F-fluoride with positron emission tomography reveals damage- and time-dependent responses to fatigue loading in the rat ulna.  Bone. 2006;  39(2) 229-236
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Lim R, Fahey F H, Drubach L A, Connolly L P, Treves S T. Early experience with 18F sodium fluoride bone PET in young patients with back pain.  J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;  27(3) 277-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Antoch G, Vogt F M, Freudenberg L S et al.. Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology.  JAMA. 2003;  290(24) 3199-3206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Metser U, Lerman H, Blank A, Lievshitz G, Bokstein F, Even-Sapir E. Malignant involvement of the spine: assessment by 18F-FDG PET/CT.  J Nucl Med. 2004;  45(2) 279-284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Keidar Z, Israel O, Krausz Y. SPECT/CT in tumor imaging: technical aspects and clinical applications.  Semin Nucl Med. 2003;  33(3) 205-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Kostakoglu L, Hardoff R, Mirtcheva R, Goldsmith S J. PET-CT fusion imaging in differentiating physiologic from pathologic FDG uptake.  Radiographics. 2004;  24(5) 1411-1431
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Kaste S C. Issues specific to implementing PET-CT for pediatric oncology: what we have learned along the way.  Pediatr Radiol. 2004;  34(3) 205-213
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Roberts E G, Shulkin B L. Technical issues in performing PET studies in pediatric patients.  J Nucl Med Technol. 2004;  32(1) 5-9 , quiz 10-1
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Cherry S R. The 2006 Henry N. Wagner Lecture: Of mice and men (and positrons)-advances in PET imaging technology.  J Nucl Med. 2006;  47(11) 1735-1745
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Wiest R, Kassubek J, Schindler K et al.. Comparison of voxel-based 3-D MRI analysis and subtraction ictal SPECT coregistered to MRI in focal epilepsy.  Epilepsy Res. 2005;  65(1-2) 125-133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Cascino G D, Buchhalter J R, Mullan B P, So E L. Ictal SPECT in nonlesional extratemporal epilepsy.  Epilepsia. 2004;  45(suppl 4) 32-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

S. Ted TrevesM.D. 

Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Boston

300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115

eMail: treves@childrens.harvard.edu