Analyse passiver Bewegungen durch Physiotherapieschüler

Zusammenfassung

In der Ausbildung der Manuellen Therapie (Maitland Konzept) ist die Analyse von Schmerz, Widerstand, Spasmus, Bewegungslimit und limitierendem Faktor ein wichtiger Unterrichtsinhalt. Die Pilotstudie verglich die Ergebnisse der Reliabilität der Bewegungsanalyse durch Physiotherapieschüler ohne jegliche Vorerfahrung vor und nach einem Unterrichtsprogramm zur Standardisierung der Untersuchungstechniken.

Physiotherapieschüler können zuverlässig den limitierenden Faktor einer Bewegung analysieren. Diese Fähigkeiten verbessern sich durch den Unterricht.

Abstract

The analysis of pain, resistance, spasm, limit of motion and the limiting factor play an important role in manual therapy (Maitland concept) education. This pilot study investigated the reliability of passive movement analysis by physiotherapy students without any prior experience before and after a standardization training.

Physiotherapy students can reliably analyse the limiting factor of a movement. This ability improves during training.

Schlüsselwörter

Interrater-Reliabilität - Bewegungsanalyse - Physiotherapieschüler

Key words

interrater reliability - movement analysis - physiotherapy students

Literatur

• 1 Andrews A, Bohannon R. Decreased shoulder range of motion on paretic side after stroke.  Physical Therapy. 1989;  69 768-772
• 2 Boland R, Adams R. Effects of ankle dorsiflexion on range and reliability of straight leg raising.  Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2000;  46 191-199
• 3 Butler D. Mobilisation des Nervensystems. Berlin; Springer 1995
• 4 Chesworth B, MacDermid J, Roth J. et al . Movement diagram and ‚end-feel’ reliability when measuring passive lateral rotation of the shoulder in patients with shoulder pathology.  Physical Therapy. 1998;  78 593-600
• 5 Croft P, Pope D, Boswell R. et al . Observer variability in measuring elevation and external rotation of the shoulder.  British Journal for Rheumatology. 1994;  33 942-946
• 6 De Winter A, Heemskerk M, Terwee C. et al . Inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of range of motion in patients with shoulder pain using a digital inclinometer.  BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders,. 2004;  5 18
• 7 Degenhardt B, Snider K, Snider E. et al . Interobserver reliability of osteopathic palpatory diagnostic tests of the lumbar spine: improvement from consensus training.  Journal of the American Osteopathic association. 2005;  105 465-473
• 8 Van Dillen L, Sahrmann S, Norton B. et al . Reliability of physical examination items used for classification of patients with low back pain.  Physical Therapy. 1998;  78 979-988
• 9 Fjellner A, Bexander C, Faleij R. et al . Interexaminer Reliability in physical examination of the cervical spine.  Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 1999;  22 511-516
• 10 Harvey D, Byfield D. Preliminary studies with a mechanical model for the evaluation of spinal motion palpation.  Clinical Biomechanics. 1991;  6 79-82
• 11 Van den Hoogen H, Koes B, Devilé J. et al . The inter-observer reproducibility of Lasègue’s sign in patients with low back pain in general practice.  British Journal of General Practice. 1996;  46 727-730
• 12 Hoving J, Buchbinder R, Green S. et al . How reliably do rheumatologists measure shoulder movement?.  Annals of Rheumatic Diseases. 2002;  61 612-616
• 13 Jordan K. Assessment of the published reliability studies for cervical range-of-motion measurement tools.  Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 2000;  23 180-195
• 14 Jull G. Manual examination: Is pain provocation a major cue for spinal dysfunction?.  Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1994;  40 159-165
• 15 Kosteljanetz M, Bang F, Schmidt-Olsen S. The clinical significance of straight-leg-raising (Lasègue’s sign) in the diagnosis of prolapsed lumbar disc.  Spine. 1987;  13 393-395
• 16 Maher C, Latimer J. Pain or resistance – the manual therapists dilemma.  Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1992;  38 257-260
• 17 Maher C, Adams R. Reliability of pain and stiffness assessments in clinical manual lumbar spine examination.  Physical Therapy. 1994;  74 801-811
• 18 Maitland G, Hengeveld E, Banks K. et al .Manipulation der Wirbelsäule. Heidelberg; Springer 2008 4. Aufl
• 19 Matyas T, Bach T. The reliability of selected techniques in clinical arthrometrics.  Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 1985;  31 175-194
• 20 McCombe P, Fairbank J, Cockersole B. et al . Reproducibility of Physical Signs in Low-Back Pain.  Spine. 1989;  14 908-918
• 21 Mior S, McGregor M, Schut B. The role of experience in clinical accuracy.  Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics. 1990;  13 68-71
• 22 Nilsson N. Measuring passive cervical motion: A study of reliability.  Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics. 1995;  18 293-297
• 23 Poiraudeau S, Foltz V, Drapé J L. et al . Value of the bell test and the hyperextension test for diagnosis in sciatica associated with disc herniation: comparison with Lasègue’s sign.  British Society for Rheumatology. 2001;  40 460-466
• 24 Reichert B, Seifried C, Obenland E. et al . Genauigkeit der manuellen Winkelmessung am Ellbogengelenk.  Physikalische Therapie. 2005;  8 327-333
• 25 Rothstein J. Measurement in physical therapy. New York; Churchill Livingstone 1985
• 26 Sabari J, Maltzev I, Lubarsky D. et al . Goniometric assessment of shoulder range of motion: Comparison of testing in supine and sitting positions.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1998;  79 647-651
• 27 Shirley D. Manual therapy and tissue stiffness. Boyling J, Jull G Grieve’s Modern Manual Therapy – The vertebral column Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 2006 3rd ed
• 28 Terwee C, Winter de A, Scholten R. et al . Interobserver reproducibility of the visual estimation of range of motion of the shoulder.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2005;  86 1356-1361
• 29 Valentine R, Lewis J. Intraobserver reliability of 4 physiologic movements of the shoulder in subjects with and without symptoms.  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2006;  87 1242-1248
• 30 Waddell G, Main C, Morris E. et al . Normality and reliability in the clinical assessment of backache.  British Medical Journal. 1982;  284 1519-1523
• 31 Watkins M, Riddle D, Lamb R. et al . Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting.  Physical Therapy. 1991;  71 15-22
• 32 Youdas J, Carey J, Garrett T. Reliability of measurements of cervical spine range of motion – comparison of three methods.  Physical Therapy. 1991;  71 98-106
• 33 Youdas J, Garett T, Suman V. et al . Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: An initial goniometric study.  Physical Therapy. 1992;  72 770-780