Ultraschall Med 2008; 29: 188-202
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027799
Supplement

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Comments and Illustrations Regarding the Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) – Update 2008

Kommentar der Leitlinien des kontrastverstärkten Ultraschalls (CEUS) – Update 2008C. F. Dietrich1
  • 1Innere Medizin 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus Bad Mergentheim
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
02. Oktober 2008 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die aktuell veröffentlichten EFSUMB-Leittlinien und -Empfehlungen beschreiben die Anwendung von Ultraschallkontrastmitteln. Sie sind Gegenstand dieses Bildessays mit Kommentaren und ergänzender Literaturanalyse. CEUS ist zum wichtigsten bildgebenden Verfahren für fokale Leberläsionen geworden. Insbesondere wird die Charakterisierung von Lebertumoren detailliert beschrieben aber auch die Therapiekontrolle lokal ablativer Verfahren. Die Empfehlungen betreffen auch die Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Ultraschallkontrastmitteln für die Beurteilung der Nieren. Diskutiert werden die Detektion und Charakterisierung von fokalen Nierenläsionen sowie die Therapiekontrolle lokal ablativer Verfahren. CEUS und auch der kontrastverstärkte endoskopische Ultraschall können für die Charakterisierung von Pankreasläsionen genutzt werden. Das duktale Adenokarzinom als der häufigste Tumor des Pankreas zeigt typischerweise eine deutlich geringere Kontrastanreicherung im Vergleich zum angrenzenden pankreatischen Gewebe wogegen neuroendokrine Tumoren und das seröse mikrozystische Pankreasadenom durch eine Mehranreicherung charakterisiert sind. Diese Kenntnis ist wichtig für die Differenzialdiagnose von Pankreastumoren. Vesikoureteraler Reflux und stumpfes Bauchtrauma werden ebenfalls erwähnt. Andere Kapitel der Leitlinien sind in getrennten Artikeln dieses Supplements enthalten.

Abstract

The recently published EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations provide general advice for the use of ultrasound contrast agents to improve the management of patients. They are the subject of this pictorial essay, comments and analysis of the literature. CEUS has become the most important imaging method for focal liver diseases. Its uses are discussed in detail, especially the characterization of liver tumors and the monitoring of local treatment. The recommendations also deal with the uses of ultrasound contrast agents for the evaluation of the microvasculature and macrovasculature of the kidneys, including the characterization of focal renal lesions, the detection of lesions and the monitoring of local treatment. CEUS and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound can be used to characterize lesions. Ductal adenocarcinoma as the most common tumor of the pancreas is typically hypoenhanced compared to the adjacent pancreatic tissue in all phases. Neuroendocrine tumors and serous microcystic adenoma of the pancreas are characterized by hypervascularization appearing typically hyperenhanced during CEUS. This is of importance for a differential diagnosis. Vesicoureteric reflux and blunt abdominal trauma are also mentioned. Other parts or chapters of the guidelines are described in a separate paper of this supplement.

References

  • 1 Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T. et al . Guidelines and Good Clinical Practice Recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) – Update 2008.  Ultraschall in Med. 2008;  29 28-44
  • 2 Albrecht T, Blomley M, Bolondi L. et al . Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound. January 2004.  Ultraschall in Med. 2004;  25 249-256
  • 3 Tranquart F, Claudon M, Correas J M. Guidelines for the use of contrast agents in ultrasound.  J Radiol. 2005;  86 1047-1054
  • 4 Leen E, Moug S J, Horgan P. Potential impact and utilization of ultrasound contrast media.  Eur Radiol. 2004;  14 P16-24
  • 5 Dietrich C F. 3D real time contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, a new technique.  Röntgenstr Fortschr. 2002;  174 160-163
  • 6 Piscaglia F, Bolondi L. The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23 188 investigations.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2006;  32 1369-1375
  • 7 Blomley M, Claudon M, Cosgrove D. WFUMB Safety Symposium on Ultrasound Contrast Agents: clinical applications and safety concerns.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;  33 180-186
  • 8 Barnett S B. Safe use of ultrasound contrast agents.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;  33 171-172
  • 9 Barnett S B, Duck F, Ziskin M. WFUMB Symposium on Safety of Ultrasound in Medicine: conclusions and recommendations on biological effects and safety of ultrasound contrast agents, 2006.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;  33 233-234
  • 10 Barnett S B, Duck F, Ziskin M. Recommendations on the safe use of ultrasound contrast agents.  Ultrasound Med Biol. 2007;  33 173-174
  • 11 Leen E, Ceccotti P, Kalogeropoulou C. et al . Prospective multicenter trial evaluating a novel method of characterizing focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced sonography.  Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  186 1551-1559
  • 12 Bryant T H, Blomley M J, Albrecht T. et al . Improved characterization of liver lesions with liver-phase uptake of liver-specific microbubbles: prospective multicenter study.  Radiology. 2004;  232 799-809
  • 13 Albrecht T, Blomley M J, Burns P N. et al . Improved detection of hepatic metastases with pulse-inversion US during the liver-specific phase of SHU 508A: multicenter study.  Radiology. 2003;  227 361-370
  • 14 Dietrich C F, Kratzer W, Strobe D. et al . Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CT and MRI.  World J Gastroenterol. 2006;  12 1699-1705
  • 15 Ricci P, Laghi A, Cantisani V. et al . Contrast-enhanced sonography with SonoVue: enhancement patterns of benign focal liver lesions and correlation with dynamic gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MRI.  Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  184 821-827
  • 16 Burns P N, Wilson S R. Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images – concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images.  Radiology. 2007;  242 162-174
  • 17 Wilson S R, Burns P N. An algorithm for the diagnosis of focal liver masses using microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography.  Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  186 1401-1412
  • 18 Dietrich C F, Schreiber-Dietrich D, Schuessler G. et al . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver – state of the art.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2007;  132 1225-1231
  • 19 Xu H X, Xie X Y, Lu M D. et al . Contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 2 cm.  J Clin Ultrasound. 2008;  36 257-266
  • 20 Xu H X, Liu G J, Lu M D. et al . Characterization of small focal liver lesions using real-time contrast-enhanced sonography: diagnostic performance analysis in 200 patients.  J Ultrasound Med. 2006;  25 349-361
  • 21 Bernatik T, Becker D, Neureiter D. et al . Detection of liver metastases--comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound using first versus second generation contrast agents.  Ultraschall in Med. 2003;  24 175-179
  • 22 Hohmann J, Albrecht T, Hoffmann C W. et al . Ultrasonographic detection of focal liver lesions: increased sensitivity and specificity with microbubble contrast agents.  Eur J Radiol. 2003;  46 147-159
  • 23 Hohmann J, Albrecht T, Oldenburg A. et al . Liver metastases in cancer: detection with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.  Abdom Imaging. 2004;  29 669-681
  • 24 Oldenburg A, Hohmann J, Foert E. et al . Detection of hepatic metastases with low MI real time contrast-enhanced sonography and SonoVue.  Ultraschall in Med. 2005;  26 277-284
  • 25 Konopke R, Kersting S, Saeger H D. et al . Detection of liver lesions by contrast-enhanced ultrasound: comparison to intraoperative findings.  Ultraschall in Med. 2005;  26 107-113
  • 26 Bernatik T, Strobel D, Hahn E G. et al . Detection of liver metastases: comparison of contrast-enhanced wide-band harmonic imaging with conventional ultrasonography.  J Ultrasound Med. 2001;  20 509-515
  • 27 Dietrich C F, Chichakli M, Hirche T O. et al . Sonographic findings of the hepatobiliary-pancreatic system in adult patients with cystic fibrosis.  J Ultrasound Med. 2002;  21 409-416
  • 28 Dietrich C F, Ignee A, Trojan J. et al . Improved characterization of histologically proven liver tumors by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography during the portal venous and specific late phase of SHU 508A.  Gut. 2004;  53 401-405
  • 29 Konopke R, Kersting S, Bergert H. et al . Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to detect liver metastases: A prospective trial to compare transcutaneous unenhanced and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in patients undergoing laparotomy.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007;  22 201-207
  • 30 Leen E, Ceccotti P, Moug S J. et al . Potential value of contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography during partial hepatectomy for metastases: an essential investigation before resection?.  Ann Surg. 2006;  243 236-240
  • 31 Torzilli G. Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography in surgery for liver tumors.  Eur J Radiol. 2004;  51 S25-S29
  • 32 Torzilli G, Olivari N, Moroni E. et al . Contrast-enhanced intraoperative ultrasonography in surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis.  Liver Transpl. 2004;  10 S34-S38
  • 33 Herbay von A, Vogt C, Willers R. et al . Real-time imaging with the sonographic contrast agent SonoVue: differentiation between benign and malignant hepatic lesions.  J Ultrasound Med. 2004;  23 1557-1568
  • 34 Herbay von A, Vogt C, Haussinger D. Late-phase pulse-inversion sonography using the contrast agent levovist: differentiation between benign and malignant focal lesions of the liver.  Am J Roentgenol. 2002;  179 1273-1279
  • 35 Nicolau C, Vilana R, Catala V. et al . Importance of evaluating all vascular phases on contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant focal liver lesions.  Am J Roentgenol. 2006;  186 158-167
  • 36 Nicolau C, Bru C. Focal liver lesions:evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.  Abdom Imaging. 2004;  14 (Suppl. 8) 63-71
  • 37 Kim S H, Lee J M, Lee J Y. et al . Value of contrast-enhanced sonography for the characterization of focal hepatic lesions in patients with diffuse liver disease: receiver operating characteristic analysis.  Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  184 1077-1084
  • 38 Ding H, Wang W P, Huang B J. et al . Imaging of focal liver lesions: low-mechanical-index real-time ultrasonography with SonoVue.  J Ultrasound Med. 2005;  24 285-297
  • 39 Catala V, Nicolau C, Vilana R. et al . Characterization of focal liver lesions: comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus spiral computed tomography.  Eur Radiol. 2007;  17 1066-1073
  • 40 Mork H, Ignee A, Schuessler G. et al . Analysis of neuroendocrine tumor metastases in the liver using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;  42 652-662
  • 41 Ignee A, Weiper D, Schuessler G. et al . Sonographic characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma at time of diagnosis.  Z Gastroenterol. 2005;  43 289-294
  • 42 Leen E. The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterization of focal liver lesions.  Eur Radiol. 2001;  11 E27-E34
  • 43 Ramnarine K V, Kyriakopoulou K, Gordon P. et al . Improved characterization of focal liver tumors: dynamic power Doppler imaging using NC 100 100 echo-enhancer.  Eur J Ultrasound. 2000;  11 95-104
  • 44 Schuessler G, Ignee A, Hirche T. et al . Improved detection and characterization of liver tumors with echo-enhanced ultrasound.  Z Gastroenterol. 2003;  41 1167-1176
  • 45 Strobel D, Kleinecke C, Hansler J. et al . Contrast-enhanced sonography for the characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas-correlation with histological differentiation.  Ultraschall in Med. 2005;  26 270-276
  • 46 Albrecht T, Overberg A, Hoffmann C W. et al . Characterization of focal liver lesions with phase inversion ultrasound during the late liver-specific phase of Levovist.  Acad Radiol. 2002;  9 S375
  • 47 Bolondi L, Gaiani S, Celli N. et al . Characterization of small nodules in cirrhosis by assessment of vascularity: the problem of hypovascular hepatocellular carcinoma.  Hepatology. 2005;  42 27-34
  • 48 Celik H, Ozdemir H, Yucel C. et al . Characterization of hyperechoic focal liver lesions: quantitative evaluation with pulse inversion harmonic imaging in the late phase of levovist.  J Ultrasound Med. 2005;  24 39-47
  • 49 Quaia E, Stacul F, Gaiani S. et al . Comparison of diagnostic performance of unenhanced vs SonoVue-enhanced ultrasonography in focal liver lesions characterization. The experience of three Italian centers.  Radiol Med. 2004;  108 71-81
  • 50 Strobel D, Raeker S, Martus P. et al . Phase inversion harmonic imaging versus contrast-enhanced power Doppler sonography for the characterization of focal liver lesions.  Int J Colorectal Dis. 2003;  18 63-72
  • 51 Herbay von A, Haeussinger D, Gregor M. et al . Characterization and detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): comparison of the ultrasound contrast agents SonoVue (BR 1) and Levovist (SH U 508A).  Ultraschall in Med. 2007;  28 168-175
  • 52 Wang W P, Ding H, Qi Q. et al . Characterization of focal hepatic lesions with contrast-enhanced C-cube gray scale ultrasonography.  World J Gastroenterol. 2003;  9 1667-1674
  • 53 Wilson S R, Burns P N, Muradali D. et al . Harmonic hepatic US with microbubble contrast agent: initial experience showing improved characterization of hemangioma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastasis.  Radiology. 2000;  215 153-161
  • 54 Dietrich C F, Mertens J C, Braden B. et al . Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of histologically proven liver hemangiomas.  Hepatology. 2007;  45 1139-1145
  • 55 Bartolotta T V, Midiri M, Quaia E. et al . Liver hemangiomas undetermined at grey-scale ultrasound: contrast-enhancement patterns with SonoVue and pulse-inversion US.  Eur Radiol. 2005;  15 685-693
  • 56 Bleuzen A, Huang C, Olar M. et al . Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in focal lesions of the liver using cadence contrast pulse sequencing.  Ultraschall in Med. 2006;  27 40-48
  • 57 Blomley M J, Sidhu P S, Cosgrove D O. et al . Do different types of liver lesions differ in their uptake of the microbubble contrast agent SH U 508A in the late liver phase? Early experience.  Radiology. 2001;  220 661-667
  • 58 Byun J H, Kim T K, Lee C W. et al . Arterioportal shunt: prevalence in small hemangiomas versus that in hepatocellular carcinomas 3 cm or smaller at two-phase helical CT.  Radiology. 2004;  232 354-360
  • 59 Chan Y L, Lee S F, Yu S C. et al . Hepatic malignant tumor versus cavernous hemangioma: differentiation on multiple breath-hold turbo spin-echo MRI sequences with different T 2-weighting and T 2-relaxation time measurements on a single slice multi-echo sequence.  Clin Radiol. 2002;  57 250-257
  • 60 Quaia E, Bertolotto M, Dalla P L. Characterization of liver hemangiomas with pulse inversion harmonic imaging.  Eur Radiol. 2002;  12 537-544
  • 61 Quaia E, Bartolotta T V, Midiri M. et al . Analysis of different contrast enhancement patterns after microbubble-based contrast agent injection in liver hemangiomas with atypical appearance on baseline scan.  Abdom Imaging. 2006;  31 59-64
  • 62 Gossmann J, Scheuermann E H, Frilling A. et al . Multiple adenomas and hepatocellular carcinoma in a renal transplant patient with glycogen storage disease type 1a (von Gierke disease).  Transplantation. 2001;  72 343-344
  • 63 Bartolozzi C, Lencioni R, Paolicchi A. et al . Differentiation of hepatocellular adenoma and focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: comparison of power Doppler imaging and conventional color Doppler sonography.  Eur Radiol. 1997;  7 1410-1415
  • 64 Quaia E, Calliada F, Bertolotto M. et al . Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-specific US modes and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence.  Radiology. 2004;  232 420-430
  • 65 Fabre A, Audet P, Vilgrain V. et al . Histologic scoring of liver biopsy in focal nodular hyperplasia with atypical presentation.  Hepatology. 2002;  35 414-420
  • 66 Nguyen B N, Flejou J F, Terris B. et al . Focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver: a comprehensive pathologic study of 305 lesions and recognition of new histologic forms.  Am J Surg Pathol. 1999;  23 1441-1454
  • 67 Choi B Y, Nguyen M H. The diagnosis and management of benign hepatic tumors.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2005;  39 401-412
  • 68 Dietrich C F, Schuessler G, Trojan J. et al . Differentiation of focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.  Br J Radiol. 2005;  78 704-707
  • 69 Gouysse G, Frachon S, Hervieu V. et al . Endothelial cell differentiation in hepatocellular adenomas: implications for histopathological diagnosis.  J Hepatol. 2004;  41 259-266
  • 70 Huang-Wei C, Bleuzen A, Bourlier P. et al . Differential Diagnosis of Focal Nodular Hyperplasia With Quantitative Parametric Analysis in Contrast-Enhanced Sonography.  Invest Radiol. 2006;  41 363-368
  • 71 Liu C L, Fan S T, Lo C M. et al . Hepatic resection for incidentaloma.  J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;  8 785-793
  • 72 Dietrich C F, Schall H, Kirchner J. et al . Sonographic detection of focal changes in the liver hilus in patients receiving corticosteroid therapy.  Z Gastroenterol. 1997;  35 1051-1057
  • 73 Dietrich C F, Wehrmann T, Zeuzem S. et al . Analysis of hepatic echo patterns in chronic hepatitis C.  Ultraschall in Med. 1999;  20 9-14
  • 74 Hirche T O, Ignee A, Hirche H. et al . Evaluation of hepatic steatosis by ultrasound in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.  Liver Int. 2007;  27 748-757
  • 75 Dietrich C F. Characterization of benign focal liver lesions with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Lencioni R Enhancing the role of ultrasound with contrast agents Springer Verlag 2006: 17-38
  • 76 Bolondi L. Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis.  J Hepatol. 2003;  39 1076-1084
  • 77 Gaiani S, Celli N, Piscaglia F. et al . Usefulness of contrast-enhanced perfusional sonography in the assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma hypervascular at spiral computed tomography.  J Hepatol. 2004;  41 421-426
  • 78 Nicolau C, Vilana R, Bru C. The use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the management of the cirrhotic patient and for detection of HCC.  Eur Radiol. 2004;  14 63-71
  • 79 Ishida H, Konno K, Hamashima Y. et al . Portal tumor thrombus due to gastrointestinal cancer.  Abdom Imaging. 1999;  24 585-590
  • 80 Eisert W G, Ryn van J, Kallmeyer M. et al . Noninvasive method for measuring thrombus formation in patients after peripheral angioplasty using three-dimensional B-mode and color-coded Doppler ultrasonography.  J Clin Pharmacol. 1997;  37 79S-83S
  • 81 Furuse J, Matsutani S, Yoshikawa M. et al . Diagnosis of portal vein tumor thrombus by pulsed Doppler ultrasonography.  J Clin Ultrasound. 1992;  20 439-446
  • 82 Venturi A, Piscaglia F, Silvagni E. et al . Role of real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of metastatic portal vein thrombosis.  Ultraschall in Med. 2007;  28 75-78
  • 83 Bauditz J, Schade T, Wermke W. Sonographic diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinomas by the use of contrast agents.  Ultraschall in Med. 2007;  28 161-167
  • 84 Xu H X, Lu M D, Liu G J. et al . Imaging of peripheral cholangiocarcinoma with low-mechanical index contrast-enhanced sonography and SonoVue: initial experience.  J Ultrasound Med. 2006;  25 23-33
  • 85 Gorg C, Graef C, Bert T. Contrast-enhanced sonography for differential diagnosis of an inhomogeneous spleen of unknown cause in patients with pain in the left upper quadrant.  J Ultrasound Med. 2006;  25 729-734
  • 86 Nuernberg D, Ignee A, Dietrich C F. Ultrasound in gastroenterology-liver and spleen.  Z Gastroenterol. 2006;  44 991-1000
  • 87 Gorg C, Bert T. Contrast-enhanced sonography of focal splenic lesions with a second-generation contrast agent.  Ultraschall in Med. 2005;  26 470-477
  • 88 Faust D, Fellbaum C, Zeuzem S. et al . Nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver: a rare differential diagnosis of cholestasis with response to ursodeoxycholic acid.  Z Gastroenterol. 2003;  41 255-258
  • 89 Braden B, Helm B, Fabian T. et al . Bacillary angiomatosis of the liver, a suspected ultrasound diagnosis?.  Z Gastroenterol. 2000;  38 785-789
  • 90 Braden B, Thalhammer A, Schwarz W. et al . Bleeding complications from hepatic mucoidal aneurysmata: value of color duplex sonography after liver transplantation.  Liver Transpl. 2002;  8 636-638
  • 91 Schuessler G, Fellbaum C, Fauth F. et al . The infammatory pseudotumor – an unusual liver tumor.  Ultraschall in Med. 2006;  27 273-279
  • 92 Chen M H, Yang W, Yan K. et al . The role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in planning treatment protocols for hepatocellular carcinoma before radiofrequency ablation.  Clin Radiol. 2007;  62 752-760
  • 93 Tak W Y, Park S Y, Jeon S W. et al . Ultrasonography-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for treatment of a huge symptomatic hepatic cavernous hemangioma.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;  40 167-170
  • 94 Buscarini E, Savoia A, Brambilla G. et al . Radiofrequency thermal ablation of liver tumors.  Eur Radiol. 2005;  15 884-894
  • 95 Frericks B B, Ritz J P, Roggan A. et al . Multipolar radiofrequency ablation of hepatic tumors: initial experience.  Radiology. 2005;  237 1056-1062
  • 96 Frieser M, Schaber S, Peters A. et al . Radiofrequency ablation using perfused needle electrodes-study of intermittent and continuous triple needle application ex vivo.  Eur Surg Res. 2005;  37 312-316
  • 97 Lencioni R. Editorial on Machi et al. “long term follow-up outcome of patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma”.  World J Surg. 2005;  29 1363
  • 98 Lencioni R, Della P C, Bartolozzi C. Percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation in the therapeutic management of hepatocellular carcinoma.  Abdom Imaging. 2005;  30 401-408
  • 99 Lencioni R, Cioni D, Crocetti L. et al . Early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: long-term results of percutaneous image-guided radiofrequency ablation.  Radiology. 2005;  234 961-967
  • 100 Livraghi T, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F. et al . Risk of tumor seeding after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for hepatocellular carcinoma.  Br J Surg. 2005;  92 856-858
  • 101 Solbiati L, Ierace T, Tonolini M. et al . Guidance and monitoring of radiofrequency liver tumor ablation with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.  Eur J Radiol. 2004;  51 S19-S23
  • 102 Hansler J, Neureiter D, Wasserburger M. et al . Percutaneous US-guided radiofrequency ablation with perfused needle applicators: improved survival with the VX 2 tumor model in rabbits.  Radiology. 2004;  230 169-174
  • 103 Hansler J, Frieser M, Tietz V. et al . Percutaneous ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) using saline-perfused (wet) needle electrodes for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma – long term experience.  Ultraschall in Med. 2007;  28 604-611
  • 104 Israel G M, Bosniak M A. An update of the Bosniak renal cyst classification system.  Urology. 2005;  66 484-488
  • 105 Israel G M, Bosniak M A. How I do it: evaluating renal masses.  Radiology. 2005;  236 441-450
  • 106 Israel G M, Bosniak M A. MR imaging of cystic renal masses.  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2004;  12 403-412
  • 107 Ascenti G, Gaeta M, Magno C. et al . Contrast-enhanced second-harmonic sonography in the detection of pseudocapsule in renal cell carcinoma.  Am J Roentgenol. 2004;  182 1525-1530
  • 108 Quaia E, Siracusano S, Bertolotto M. et al . Characterization of renal tumors with pulse inversion harmonic imaging by intermittent high mechanical index technique: initial results.  Eur Radiol. 2003;  13 1402-1412
  • 109 Mickisch G, Carballido J, Hellsten S. et al . Guidelines on renal cell cancer.  Eur Urol. 2001;  40 252-255
  • 110 Darge K, Moeller R T, Trusen A. et al . Diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux with low-dose contrast-enhanced harmonic ultrasound imaging.  Pediatr Radiol. 2005;  35 73-78
  • 111 Darge K, Riedmiller H. Current status of vesicoureteral reflux diagnosis.  World J Urol. 2004;  22 88-95
  • 112 Robrecht J, Darge K. In-vitro comparison of a 1st and a 2nd generation US contrast agent for reflux diagnosis.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2007;  179 818-825
  • 113 Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S. et al . Harmonic US imaging of vesicoureteric reflux in children: usefulness of a second generation US contrast agent.  Pediatr Radiol. 2004;  34 481-487
  • 114 Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S. et al . Vesicoureteral reflux: comparison between urosonography and radionuclide cystography.  Pediatr Nephrol. 2003;  18 768-771
  • 115 Zimbaro G, Ascenti G, Visalli C. et al . Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (voiding urosonography) of vesicoureteral reflux: state of the art.  Radiol Med. 2007;  112 1211-1224
  • 116 Papadopoulou F, Tsampoulas C, Siomou E. et al . Cyclic contrast-enhanced harmonic voiding urosonography for the evaluation of reflux. Can we keep the cost of the examination low?.  Eur Radiol. 2006;  16 2521-2526
  • 117 Bosio M, Manzoni G A. Detection of posterior urethral valves with voiding cystourethrosonography with echo contrast.  J Urol. 2002;  168 1711-1715
  • 118 Bosio M. Cystosonography with echocontrast: a new imaging modality to detect vesicoureteric reflux in children.  Pediatr Radiol. 1998;  28 250-255
  • 119 Xhepa R, Bosio M, Manzoni G. Voiding cystourethrosonography for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux in a developing country.  Pediatr Nephrol. 2004;  19 638-643
  • 120 Dietrich C F, Ignee A, Frey H. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound with low mechanical index: a new technique.  Z Gastroenterol. 2005;  43 1219-1223
  • 121 Hocke M, Schulze E, Gottschalk P. et al . Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.  World J Gastroenterol. 2006;  12 246-250
  • 122 Hocke M, Ignee A, Topalidis T. et al . Contrast-enhanced endosonographic Doppler spectrum analysis is helpful in discrimination between focal chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.  Pancreas. 2007;  35 286-288
  • 123 Dietrich C F, Braden B, Hocke M. et al . Improved characterization of solitary solid pancreatic tumors using contrast-enhanced trans-abdominal ultrasound.  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008;  134 635-643
  • 124 Rickes S, Monkemuller K, Malfertheiner P. Acute severe pancreatitis: contrast-enhanced sonography.  Abdom Imaging. 2007;  32 362-364
  • 125 Rickes S, Monkemuller K, Malfertheiner P. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumors.  JOP. 2006;  7 584-592
  • 126 Rickes S, Unkrodt K, Neye H. et al . Differentiation of pancreatic tumors by conventional ultrasound, unenhanced and echo-enhanced power Doppler sonography.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;  37 1313-1320
  • 127 D’Onofrio M, Caffarri S, Zamboni G. et al . Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the characterization of pancreatic mucinous cystadenoma.  J Ultrasound Med. 2004;  23 1125-1129
  • 128 D’Onofrio M, Martone E, Malago R. et al . Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the pancreas.  JOP. 2007;  8 71-76
  • 129 D’Onofrio M, Zamboni G, Faccioli N. et al . Ultrasonography of the pancreas. 4. Contrast-enhanced imaging.  Abdom Imaging. 2007;  32 171-181
  • 130 Herbay von A, Schick D, Horger M. et al . Low-MI-sonography with the contrast-agent SonoVue in the diagnosis of infarction of the spleen, kidney, liver and pancreas.  Ultraschall in Med. 2006;  27 445-450

Recommended Reading (book)

  • 131 Dietrich C F. Endoscopic ultrasound, an introductory manual and atlas. Thieme Verlag 2006
  • 132 Dietrich C F. Endosonographie. Lehrbuch und Atlas des endoskopischen Ultraschalls. Thieme Verlag 2008
  • 133 Lencioni R. Enhancing the role of ultrasound with contrast agents. Springer 2006
  • 134 Dietrich C F. Ultraschall-Kurs (Hrsg.). Deutscher Ärzteverlag 2006
  • 135 Wermke W. Sonographische Differenzialdiagnose Leberkrankheiten. Deutscher Ärzteverlag 2005

Recommended Reading (abstracts)

  • 136 Bauditz J, Bodamer A, Wermke W. Kontrastmittelsonographie: Sind nach der Diagnose Pankreaskarzinom weitere Untersuchungen erforderlich?.  Ultraschall in Med. 2006;  27 S31
  • 137 Bauditz J, Fondis K, Wermke W. Sonomorphologie und Kontrastverhalten von Fokal Nodulären Hyperplasien der Leber im Langzeitverlauf.  Ultraschall in Med. 2006;  27 S31
  • 138 Clevert D, Jung E, Staehler M. et al . Charakterisierung fokaler Nierenläsion mittels kontrastverstärkter Low-MI-Technik im Vergleich zum CT und MRT.  Ultraschall in Med. 2006;  27 S33
  • 139 Heide R, Strobel D. Kontrastmittelsonographie der Leber-Mittelklassegerät versus High-End-Gerät.  Ultraschall in Med. 2007;  28 S34
  • 140 Seitz K, Judmaier G. Das erweiterte Repertoire der Sonografie: Kontrastverstärker, Radiofrequenzablation und Punktion.  Ultraschall in Med. 2007;  28 158-160
  • 141 Strobel D, Seitz K, Blank W. et al . Klinischer Nutzen der Kontrastmittelsonographie in der Differentialdiagnose von Leberraumforderungen-Endauswertung der Multizenterstudie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Ultraschall in Med.  Ultraschall in Med. 2007;  28 S31
  • 142 Weskott H P, Andreesen H, Wang Z. et al . Kontrastmittelsonographie (CEUS) bei diffusen und umschriebenen Gallenblasenwandveränderungen.  Ultraschall in Med. 2006;  27 S32
  • 143 Weskott H P, Wang Z. Kontrastmittelassoziierte Artefakte in der sonographischen Diagnostik.  Ultraschall in Med. 2006;  27 S28
  • 144 Jedrzeyczyk M, Jakubowski W, Dietrich C F. et al . Reliability of estimation of the soft tissue perfusion with use time intensity curves (TIC) in contrast enhanced ultrasound-basic problems.  Ultrasonografia. 2008;  Supplement 1 75
  • 145 Schuessler G, Ignee A, Terhorst G. et al . Charakterisierung von Nierentumoren durch signalverstärkten Ultraschall.  Ultraschall in Med. 2002;  23 S42
  • 146 Ignee A, Braden B, Barreiros A P. et al . Contrast enhanced ultrasound for imaging of adrenal masses.  Ultraschall in Med. 2008;  29 S27
  • 147 Ignee A, Erdmann J, Selbach J. et al . Safety and efficacy of biopsy of renal masses guided by ultrasound.  Ultraschall in Med. 2008;  29 S27

Prof. Dr. med. Christoph F. Dietrich

Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Innere Medizin 2

Uhlandstr. 7

97980 Bad Mergentheim

Germany

Telefon: ++ 49/79 31/58 22 01

Fax: ++ 49/79 31/58 22 90

eMail: christoph.dietrich@ckbm.de