Am J Perinatol 1992; 9(2): 80-83
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-994676
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

© 1992 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.

Prostaglandin E2 Gel Induction of Patients with a Prior Low Transverse Cesarean Section

Jorge D. Blanco, Michael Collins, Don Willis, Sam Prien
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas, and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
04. März 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

To determine safety and efficacy of induction with prostaglandin E2 gel, we compared the outcome of 25 patients (study group) with an unfavorable cervix, a medical indication for delivery, and one prior low cervical transverse cesarean section to 56 patients (comparison group) with one prior low cervical transverse cesarean section and spontaneous labor. We placed 1 mg of prostaglandin E2 in gel intracervically in the 25 study patients. Common indications for delivery were: diabetes, post dates, and pre-eclampsia. Although most labor and delivery variables were similar, the study group had a longer mean latent phase (14.2 ± 13.8 versus 7.3 ± 3.7 hours: p <0.002), but had a shorter mean length of active phase (4.0 ± 3.5 versus 5.7 ± 3.0 hours; p <0.02). None of the patients in either group had a dehiscence of the uterine scar, nor rupture of the uterus. Both groups had a similar cesarean section rate. Since from the few reported, nonrandomized studies it appears that prostaglandin E2 gel use in patients with a prior low cervical transverse cesarean section may be useful and relatively safe, it may be time to attempt randomized trials of prostaglandin E2 gel versus oxytocin for induction of patients with a prior low cervical transverse cesarean section, unfavorable cervix, and a medical indication for delivery