Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-992380
A Convenient One-Pot Synthesis of 2,2-Dialkyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-naphtho[2,1-b]pyrans
Publication History
Publication Date:
21 November 2007 (online)
Abstract
This work describes a convenient one-pot procedure for the synthesis of 2,2-disubstituted 2,3-dihydro-1H-naphtho[2,1-b]pyrans {i.e. 2,2-disubstituted 1H-benzo[f]chromans} by the reaction of 2-tetralones and α,α-disubstituted β-hydroxy propionaldehydes under acidic conditions.
Key words
naphthopyran - aromatization - cyclizations - fused-ring systems - alkylation - rearrangements
-
1a
Nakatsuji S. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33: 348 -
1b
Gabbutt CD.Hepworth JD.Heron BM.Thomas DA.Kilner C.Partington SA. Heterocycles 2004, 63: 567 -
1c
Jockusch S.Turro NJ.Blackburn FR. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106: 9236 - 2
Van Gemert B. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2000, 344: 57 -
3a
Hollick JJ.Golding BT.Hardcastle IR.Martin N.Richardson C.Rigoreau LJM.Smith GCM.Griffin RJ. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13: 3083 -
3b
Hussein AA.Barberena I.Capson TL.Kursar TA.Coley PD.Solis PN.Gupta MP. J. Nat. Prod. 2004, 67: 451 -
3c
Moharram S.Zhou A.Wiebe LI.Knaus EE. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47: 1840 -
3d
Visentin S.Rolando B.Di Stilo A.Fruttero R.Novara M.Carbone E.Roussel C.Vanthuyne N.Gasco A. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 47: 2688 -
3e
Wood DL.Panda D.Wiernicki TR.Wilson L.Jordan MA.Singh JP. Mol. Pharmacol. 1997, 52: 437 -
4a
Gabbutt CD.Hartley DJ.Hepworth JD.Heron BM.Kanjia M.Rahman M. Tetrahedron 1994, 50: 2507 -
4b
Cottam J.Livingstone R. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 6646 -
4c
Momoda J, andHara T. inventors; US 5808100. -
4d
Tanaka K.Aoki H.Hosomi H.Ohba S. Org. Lett. 2000, 2: 2133 -
4e
Coelho PJ.Carvalho LM.Abrantes S.Oliveira MM.Oliveira-Campos AMF.Dubest R.Samat A.Guglielmetti R. Tetrahedron 2002, 58: 9505 -
4f
Harie G.Samat A.Guglielmetti R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38: 3075 -
4g
Pozzo JL.Samat A.Guglielmetti R.Lokshin V.Minkin V. Can. J. Chem. 1996, 74: 1649 -
4h
Zhao W.Carreira EM. Org. Lett. 2003, 5: 4153 -
5a
Clive DLJ.Wang J. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67: 1192 -
5b
Abeywickrema AN.Beckwith ALJ.Gerba S.
J. Org. Chem. 1987, 52: 4072 -
5c
Branchi B.Galli C.Gentili P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 2844 -
5d
Miyaura N.Ishiyama T.Sasaki H.Ishikawa M.Satoh M.Suzuki A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111: 314 -
5e
Yorimitsu H.Shinokubo H.Oshima K. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2001, 74: 225 -
5f
Yorimitsu H.Shinokubo H.Oshima K. Chem. Lett. 2000, 2: 104 -
5g
Chow YL.Zhou X.-M.Gaitan TJ.Wu Z.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111: 3813 -
5h
Guss CO. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1951, 73: 608 -
5i
Ranade AA.Joseph AR.Kumbhan VB.Paradkar MV. J. Chem. Res., Miniprint 2003, 11: 1175 -
5j
Bilgic O.Young DW. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1980, 1233 -
5k
Das S.Thanulingam TL.Rajesh CS.George MV. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36: 1337 -
5l
Rajesh CS.Thanulingam TL.Das S. Tetrahedron 1997, 53: 16817 -
5m
Shi Z.He C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126: 13596 -
5n
Shi Z.He C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126: 5964 -
6a
Jha A.Dimmock JR. Can. J. Chem. 2003, 81: 293 -
6b
Jha A.Padmanilayam MP.Dimmock JR. Synthesis 2002, 463 - 7
Jha A.Beal J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45: 8999 - 8
Oloo EO.Quail JW.Padmanilayam MP.Dimmock JR. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. E: Struct. Rep. Online 2002, 58: o687 -
9a
Upadhya TT.Gurunath S.Sudalai A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1999, 10: 2899 -
9b
Nerdel F.Frank D.Lengert H.-J.Weyerstahl P. Chem. Ber. 1968, 101: 1850 -
9c
Nerdel F.Kaminski H.Weyerstahl P. Chem. Ber. 1969, 102: 3679 -
9d
Sirkecioglu O.Talinli N.Akar A.
J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1998, 35: 457 - 11
Yamabe S.Tsuchida N.Yamazaki S. J. Comput. Chem. 2007, 28: 1561 -
12a
Carey FA. In Organic Chemistry 6th ed.: McGraw Hill; New York: 2006. p.362 -
12b
Westacott RE.Johnston KP.Rossky PJ. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123: 1006 - 13
Armarego WLF.Perrin DD. In Purification of Laboratory Chemicals 4th ed.: Butterworth Heinemann; Oxford: 2002. p.223
References and Notes
In a typical procedure, a mixture of an appropriate β-hydroxypropionaldehyde (0.01 mol) and a 2-tetralone analogue (0.0105 mol) were stirred in AcOH (ca. 50 mL) at 0 °C. Freshly prepared dry HCl gas was briskly passed through the mixture for 1 h. Stirring was continued at r.t. for 17 h. Then, AcOH was removed under vacuum and the residue was extracted with CH2Cl2 (2 × 100 mL) and H2O (2 × 50 mL). The organic layer was dried and rotary evaporated to dryness to yield crude product, which was purified by column chromatography (silica gel mesh size 230-240; eluent 1-2% EtOAc-hexane). Spectroscopic Data for a Representative Compound
Compound 4o: 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.53 (3 H, s, CH3), 3.10 and 3.46 (1 H each, d, J = 16.2 Hz, ArCHa and ArCHb), 3.97 (3 H, s, OCH3), 4.19 and 4.33 (1 H each, d, J = 10.5 Hz, OCHa and OCHb), 6.99 (1 H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, ArH), 7.08 (1 H, m, ArH), 7.15 (1 H, s, ArH), 7.32 (1 H, d, J = 6.9 Hz, ArH), 7.39-7.50 (4 H, m, ArH), 7.61 (1 H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, ArH), 7.73 (1 H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, ArH) ppm. 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3,): δ = 25.00, 35.84, 36.36, 55.75, 74.42, 101.48, 112.70, 115.65, 116.56, 124.80, 126.31, 127.09, 127.91, 129.03, 130.51, 134.82, 146.17, 152.33, 158.81 ppm. IR (KBr): ν = 2963, 1624, 1515, 1233, 1222, 1028, 830, 699 cm-1.