Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2007; 116(5): 231-239
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-983918
Fortbildung - Implantologie

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Grenzen von Korrekturmöglichkeiten in der Implantatprothetik - 3 klinische Falldemonstrationen

Limits for the Adjustment of Prosthetic Implant Borne SuprastructuresZ. Ibrahim1 , A. Zöllner1 , J. Jackowski2
  • 1Abteilung für Zahnärztliche Prothetik der ZMK-Fakultät der Universität Witten/Herdecke
  • 2Abteilung für Zahnärztliche Chirurgie und Poliklinische Ambulanz der ZMK-Fakultät der Universität Witten/Herdecke
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
01 June 2007 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Trotz dezidierter präimplantologischer Diagnostik bedeutet eine vom Therapieplan abweichende intraoperative Entscheidung auch für den erfahrenen Operateur eine kritische Phase in der Implantatchirurgie, weil ihm die Folgen für die prothetische Versorgung geläufig sein müssen. Durch verschiedene prothetische Optionen könnte der Behandler dem Patienten komplizierte chirurgische Maßnahmen ersparen. Anhand von 3 Patientenfällen werden prothetische Optionen zur Kompensation chirugischer Defizite dargestellt.

Despite firm pre-implantologic diagnosis an intra-operative change in therapy is a critical phase in implant surgery even for well-trained surgeon (therapist) as he has to be aware of the consequences for the prosthetic treatment. However, different prosthetic options can avoid or minimize difficult surgical procedures. On the basis of 3 case reports different prosthetic options for the compensation of complications will be shown.

Schlüsselwörter

Implantat - Suprakonstruktion - Kompensation - Falldemonstration

Keywords

Dental Implant - Suprastructur - Adjustment - Case Report

Literatur

  • 1 Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Glantz PO, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment at different abutments: An experimental study in dogs.  J Clin Periodontol. 1998;  25 721-727
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Agar JR, Cameron SM, Hughbanks JC, Parker MH. Cement removal from restorations luted to titanium abutments with simulated subgingival margins.  J Prosthet Dent. 1997;  78 43-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Alberktsson T, Jansson J, Lekholm U. Osseointegrated dental implants.  Dental Clinics of North America. 1986;  30 151-174
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Barclay CW, Last KS, Williams R. The clinical assessment of a ceramic-coated transmucosal dental implant collar.  Int J Prosthodont. 1996;  9 466-472
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Belser UC, Bernard JP, Buser D. Implant placement in the esthetic zone. In: Lindhe J, Karring T, Lang NP (eds). Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, ed 4. London: Blackwell Munkdgaard 2003: 915-944
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Belser UC, Bernard JP, Buser D. Implant-supported restorations in the anterior region: Prosthetic considerations.  Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1996;  8 875-883
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Belser UC, Buser D, Hess D, Schmid B, Bernard JP, Lang NP. Aesthetic implant restorations in partially edentulos patients - A critical appraisal.  Periodontol 2000. 1998;  17 132-150
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Belser UC, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Taylor TD. Prosthetic management of the partially dentate patient with fixed implant restorations.  Clin Oral Implan Res. 2000;  11 126-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Besimo CE, Guindy JS, Lewetag D, Meyer J. Prevention of Bacterial Leakage into and from Prefabricated Screw-Retained Crowns on Implants in Vitro.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;  14 654-660
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bollen CM, Papaioanno W, Eldere J Van, Schepers E, Quirynen M, Steenberghe D van. The influence of abutment surface roughness on plaque accumulation and peri-implant mucositis.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;  7 201-211
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the Bone-Lock implant system.  J Prosthet Dent. 1997;  77 68-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing Esthetics for Implant Restorations in the Anterior Maxilla: Anatomic and Surgical Considerations.  Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2004;  19 43-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. One-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-screw and hollow-cylinder implants.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 1990;  1 33-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Buser D, Arx T von. Surgical procedures in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;  11 83-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Chee W, Felton DA, Jonhson PF, Sullivan DV. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: Which is better?.  Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 1999;  14 137-141
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Chen ST, Wilson TG, Hämmerle CH. Einzeitige oder verzögerte Sofortimplantationen nach Zahnextraktion.  Implantologie. 2005;  13 15-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Choquet V, Hermans M, Adriaenssens P, Daelemans P, Tarnow DP, Malevez C. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the papilla level adjacent to single-tooth dental implants. A retrospective study in the maxillary anterior region.  J Periodontol. 2001;  72 1364-1371
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Cordaro L, Amade DS, Cordaro M. Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;  13 103-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Degidi M, Piattelli A. Immediate functional and non-functional loading of dental implants: a 2- to 60-month follow-up study of 646 titanium implants.  J Periodontol. 2003;  74 225-241
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Denissen HW, Kalk W, Veldhuis HA, Waas MA van. Anatomic consideration for preventive implantation.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;  8 191-196
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Edel A. The use of a connective tissue graft for closure over an immediate implant covered with occlusive membrane.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 1995;  6 60-65
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Ericsson I, Persson LG, Berglundh T, Marinello P C, Lindhe J, Klinge B. Different types of inflammatory reactions in peri-implant soft tissues.  J Clin Periodontol. 1995;  22 255-261
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Esposito M, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K. Radiological evaluation of marginal bone loss at tooth surfaces facing single Branemark implants.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 1993;  4 151-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Friedman LA. Oral hygiene for dental implant patients.  Tex Dent J. 1991;  108 21-23
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Gross M, Abramovich I, Weiss EI. Microleakage at the abutment-implant interface of osseointegrated implants: a comparative study.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;  14 94-100
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Heydecke G, Boudrias P, Awad MA, Albuquerque RF De, Lund JP, Feine JS. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;  14 125-130
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Higginbottom F, Belser UC, Jones SE JD Keith. Prosthetic Management of Implants in the Esthetic Zone.  Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants. 2004;  19 62-72
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Ibrahim Z, Strempel J, Zöllner A, Tschernitschek H. Einfluss von implantatgetragenen prothetischen Versorgungen auf die bakterielle Besiedelung.  ZWR. 2005;  114 259-267
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Ibrahim Z, Strempel J, Zöllner A, Tschernitschek H. Bakterielle Besiedelung bei mehrteiligen Implantaten - eine In-vivo-Studie.  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 2006;  61 358-363
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ibrahim ZG, Tschernitschek H, Rossbach A. Versiegelung der Implantatkomponenten des Brånemark(r)-Systems.  Implantologie. 2003;  11 161-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ibrahim Z, Tschernitschek H, Roßbach A. Therapie und Rezidivprophylaxe einer Periimplantitis.  Z Zahnarztl Implantol. 2005;  21 174-179
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Jahnke PV, Sandifer JB, Gher ME, Gray JL, Richardson AC. Thick free gingival and connective tissue autografts for root coverage.  J Periodontol. 1993;  64 315-322
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Jansen VK, Conrads G, Richter EJ. Microbial leakage and marginal fit of the implant-abutment interface.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;  12 709
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Jemt T, Carlsson L, Boss A, Jorneus L. In vivo load measurements on osseointegreted implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: a comparative study.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;  6 413-417
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Johnson K. A study of the dimensional changes occurring in the maxilla following tooth extraction.  Aust Dent J. 1969;  14 241-144
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Umezu K, Kois JC. Dimensions of peri-implant mucosa: an evaluation of maxillary anterior single implants in humans.  J Periodontol. 2003;  74 557-562
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Karl M, Winter W, Taylor TD, Heckmann SM. In vitro study on passive fit in implant-supported 5-unit fixed partial dentures.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;  19 30-37
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kleisner J, Marinello CP, Kundert E, Lüthy H. Prevention of bacterial colonization on implant components in vivo by a topical metronidazole gel.  Acta Med Dent Helv. 1996;  1 250-257
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kois JC. Predictable single tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys.  Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2001;  22 199-206
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Lam RV. Contour changes of the alveolar processes following extraction.  J Prosthet Dent. 1960;  10 25-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Weinlaender M, Han T, Klokkevold P, Nedic M, Orsini M. A bone regenerative approach to alveolar ridge maintenance following tooth extraction.  Report of 10 cases. J Periodontol. 1997;  68 563-570
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Lindquist LW, Rockler B, Carlsson GE. Bone resorption around fixtures in edentulous patients treated with mandibular fixed tissue-integrated prostheses.  J Prosthet Dent. 1988;  59 59-63
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Ma T, Nicholls JI, Rubenstein JE. Tolerance measurements of various implant components.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;  12 371-375
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Parel SM, Triplett RG. Immediate fixture placement: a treatment planning alternative.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990;  5 337-345
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Bragger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years.  Evid Based Dent. 2005;  6 96-97
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Polizzi G, Grunder U, Goene R, Hatano N, Henry P, Jackson WJ, Kawamura K, Renouard F, Rosenberg R, Triplett G, Werbitt M, Lithner B. Immediate and delayed implant placement into extraction sockets: a 5-year report.  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000;  2 93-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Prestipino V, Ingber A. All-ceramic implant abutments: esthetic indications.  J Esthet Dent. 1996;  8 255-262
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Quirynen M, Soete M De, Steenberghe D Van. Infectious risks for oral implants: a review of the literature.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;  13 1-19
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Quirynen M, Mei HC Van der, Bollen CM, Bossche LH Van den, Doornbusch GI, Steenberghe D van, Busscher HJ. The influence of surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque microbiology. An in vivo study on implants.  J Periodontol. 1994;  65 162-167
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Quirynen M, Steenberghe D van. Bacterial colonisation of the internal part of two-stage implants. An in vivo study.  Clin Oral Impl Res. 1993;  4 158-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Rachmiel A, Srouji S, Peled M. Alveolar ridge augmentation by distraction osteogenesis.  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001;  30 510-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Scheller H., Wichmann M., Tschernitschek H. Untersuchungen zur Bedeutung der Pfeilergeometrie für die Prognose enossaler Implantate.  Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1991;  46 675-677
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Smedberg JI, Nilner K, Rangert B, Svensson SA, Glantz SA. On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: a methodological and clinical study.  Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996;  7 55-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla.  J Periodontol. 1992;  63 995-996
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Taylor TD. Prosthodontic problems and limitations associated with osseointegration.  J Prosthet Dent. 1998;  79 74-78
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Werbitt MJ, Goldberg PV. The immediate implant: bone preservation and bone regeneration.  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;  12 206-217
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Wilson Jr TG. Guided tissue regeneration around dental implants in immediate and recent extraction sites: initial observations.  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1992;  12 18-193
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Korrespondenzadresse

Dr. med. dent. Ziad Ibrahim

Universität Witten/Herdecke, Abteilung für Zahnärztliche Prothetik

Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50

58448 Witten

Email: ziad.ibrahim@uni-wh.de