Transcolonic ventral wall hernia mesh fixation in a porcine model

Background and study aims: A natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach to ventral wall hernia repair may represent a potentially less invasive alternative to current transabdominal surgical techniques. We aimed to investigate the feasibility of using transcolonic NOTES to deliver hernia repair mesh into the peritoneal cavity, as well as the ability to manipulate composite mesh and secure it to the abdominal wall.

Methods: Five pigs weighing 20 to 25 kg were used in this feasibility study involving two acute and three survival experiments. A prototype mesh delivery system was used to transfer 1.5 - 2-cm × 2.5 - 3-cm pieces of composite hernia mesh into the peritoneal cavity. Neodymium magnets on a prototype control arm were used to help position the mesh by magnetically engaging previously placed endoscopic clips. Transfascial fixation of the mesh with 3-0 monofilament sutures was achieved using a 19-gauge hollow needle, pusher wire, and a suture tag system.

Results: Composite hernia mesh was successfully transferred and secured in 5/5 attempts. All three survival animals thrived for 14 days prior to elective sacrifice. At necropsy, the mesh sites were found to be well peritonealized without adhesions. Suture placement through the posterior fascia was confirmed in 10/12 sutures. Of these, four sutures were within the abdominal musculature, and two sutures were through the anterior fascia (transfascial).

Conclusions: Transcolonic delivery, transcutaneous magnetic manipulation, and fixation of composite hernia mesh are technically feasible in a porcine model with animal survival. An effective suturing method that allows consistent anchoring through the anterior fascia would be preferred and may require the development of novel devices.

References

• 1 Park A E, Roth J S, Kavic S M. Abdominal wall hernia.  Curr Probl Surg. 2006;  43 326-375
• 2 Pierce R A, Spitler J A, Frisella M M. et al . Pooled data analysis of laparoscopic vs. open ventral hernia repair: 14 years of patient data accrual.  Surg Endosc. 2007;  21 378-86 (Epub 2006 Dec 16)
• 3 Barbaros U, Asoglu O, Seven R. et al . The comparison of laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs: a prospective randomized study.  Hernia. 2007;  11 51-56 (Epub 2006 Nov 28)
• 4 Misra M C, Bansal V K, Kulkarni M P, Pawar D K. Comparison of laparoscopic and open repair of incisional and primary ventral hernia: results of a prospective randomized study.  Surg Endosc. 2006;  20 1839-1845 (Epub 2006 Oct 23)
• 5 Kalloo A N, Singh V K, Jagannath S B. et al . Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;  60 114-117
• 6 Pai R D, Fong D G, Bundga M E. et al . Transcolonic endoscopic cholecystectomy: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model [with video].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 428-434
• 7 Fong D G, Pai R D, Thompson C C. Transcolonic endoscopic abdominal exploration: a NOTES survival study in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 312-318 (Epub 2006 Dec 14)
• 8 Ryou M, Thompson C C. Magnetic retraction in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): addressing the problem of traction and counter-traction.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  Oral presentation at DDW 2007, Washington, D. C.
• 9 Rutkow I M. Demographic and socioeconomic aspects of hernia repair in the United States in 2003.  Surg Clin N Am. 2003;  83 1045-1051; v - vi