RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-960724
© Georg Thieme Verlag
Langzeiterfahrungen mit Kleberetainern: Aktueller Überblick und praktische Hinweise
Long-Term Experience with Direct-Bonded Retainers: Update and Clinical AdvicePublikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
21. Juni 2007 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/iok/200702/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-2007-960724-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Direkt geklebte Lingualretainer erfreuen sich zunehmender Beliebtheit, da sie mehrere Vorteile gegenüber herausnehmbaren Retentionsgeräten besitzen. Aufgrund von Nachuntersuchungen und Langzeiterfahrungen mit Kleberetainern haben sich zwei Typen von Retainern herauskristallisiert: Ein dickerer Drahtretainer für den unteren Frontzahnbereich von Eckzahn zu Eckzahn und ein dünnerer, verseilter Kleberetainer für den oberen Frontzahnbereich oder Segmente im Seitenzahnbereich. Das Ziel dieses Artikels ist es, ein klinisches Update nach mehr als 30 Jahren Erfahrung mit verschiedenen geklebten Lingualretainern sowie einige praktische Hinweise für die Herstellung und Anwendung zu geben.
Abstract
The use of fixed lingual retainers is increasing, since they have several advantages compared to removable retainers. Long-term clinical experience and follow-up studies have demonstrated the need for two types of bonded retainers: a thick wire retainer for mandibular 3-3 retainers and a thin spiral wire retainer for retention of upper incisors or other dental segments. The purpose of this article is to present a clinical update of more than 30 years of experience with various types of bonded retainers and include some practical clinical advice on retainer design and fabrication.
Schlüsselwörter
Retention - direkt geklebte Lingualretainer - Langzeiterfahrungen
Key words
Retention - direct bonded retainers - long-term experience
Literatur
- 1 Keim R G, Gottlieb E L, Nelson A H, Vogels 3rd D S. 2002 JCO study of orthodontic diagnosis and treatment procedures. Part 1. Results and trends. J Clin Orthod. 2002; 36 553-568
- 2 Knierim R W. Invisible lower cuspuid to cuspid retainer. Angle Orthod. 1973; 43 218-220
- 3 Jensen J L. Persönliche Mitteilung. 1993
- 4 Zachrisson B U, Büyükyilmaz T. Bonding in Orthodontics. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL Jr, Vig KWL (Eds). Orthodontics. Current Principles and Techniques. 4th ed., Mosby-Elsevier, St. Louis MO 2005; 579-659
- 5 Oesterle L J, Shellhart W C, Henderson S. Enhancing wire-composite bond strength of bonded retainers with wire surface treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001; 119 625-631
- 6 Segner D, Heinrici B. Bonded retainers-clinical reliability/Geklebte Retainer-klinische Zuverlässigkeit. J Orofac Orthop / Fortschr Kieferorthop. 2000; 61 352-358
- 7 Dahl E H, Zachrisson B U. Long-term experience with direct-bonded lingual retainers. J Clin Orthod. 1991; 25 619-630
- 8 Årtun J, Urbye K S. The effect of orthodontic treatment on periodontal bone support in patients with advanced loss of marginal periodontium. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1988; 93 143-148
- 9 Årtun J, Spadafora A T, Shapiro P A. A 3-year follow-up study of various types of orthodontic canine-to-canine retainers. Eur J Orthod. 1997; 19 501-509
- 10 Bearn D R. Bonded orthodontic retainers: a review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; 108 207-213
- 11 Andrén A, Asplund J, Azarmidohkt E, Svensson R, Varde P, Mohlin B. A clinical evaluation of long term retention with bonded retainers made from multi-strand wires. Swed Dent J. 1998; 22 123-131
- 12 Axelsson S, Zachrisson B U. Clinical experience with direct-bonded labial retainers. J Clin Orthod. 1992; 26 480-490
- 13 Zachrisson B U, Bantleon H P. Optimal mechanics for mandibular molar uprighting. World J Orthod. 2005; 6 80-87
- 14 Årtun J, Marstrander P B. Clinical efficiency of two different types of direct bonded space maintainers. ASDC J Dent Child. 1983; 50 197-204
- 15 Wong P, Freer T J. Patients' attitudes towards compliance with retainer wear. Aust Orthod J. 2005; 21 45-53
- 16 Behrents R G. The consequences of adult craniofacial growth. In: Carlson DS (Ed). Orthodontics in an Aging Society. Craniofacial Growth Series Monograph 22. Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 1989; 53-99
- 17 Gorman J C, Smith R J. Comparison of treatment effects with labial and lingual fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991; 99 202-209
- 18 Sadowsky C, Schneider B J, BeGole E A, Tahir E. Long-term stability after orthodontic treatment: nonextraction with prolonged retention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994; 106 243-249
- 19 Zachrisson B U. Important aspects of long-term stability. J Clin Orthod. 1997; 31 562-583
- 20 Iseri H, Solow B. Continued eruption of maxillary incisors and first molars in girls from 9 to 25 years, studied by the implant method. Eur J Orthod. 1996; 18 245-256
- 21 Gaare D, Rølla G, Aryadi F J, van der Ouderaa F. Improvement of gingival health by toothbrushing in individuals with large amounts of calculus. J Clin Periodontol. 1990; 17 38-41
- 22 White D J. Dental calculus: recent insights into occurrence, formation, prevention, removal and oral health effects of supragingival and subgingival deposits. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997; 105 (5 Pt. 2) 508-522
- 23 Heier E E, De Smit A A, Wijgaerts I A, Adriaens P A. Periodontal implications of bonded versus removable retainers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 112 607-616
B. U. Zachrisson
Department of Orthodontics · University of Oslo
PO Box 11 09 Blindern
0317 Oslo
Norway
eMail: zachriss@odont.uio.no