Download PDF
Synlett 2008(2): 185-188  
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1000880
LETTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Synthesis of Tetrasubstituted 2-Aryl-3-arylsulfonyl Pyrroles: Unexpected Regioselectivity in Directed ortho-Metallation Reactions

Nick Bailey, Emmanuel Demont*, Neil Garton, Hui-Xian Seow
Neurology and Gastrointestinal Centre of Excellence for Drug Discovery, GlaxoSmithKline, New Frontiers Science Park, Third Avenue, Harlow, Essex, CM19 5AW, UK
Fax: +44(127)9627685; e-Mail: emmanuel.h.demont@gsk.com;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 10 September 2007
Publication Date:
21 December 2007 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

3-Arylsulfonyl pyrroles can be readily obtained from 3-Br-TIPS pyrrole via halogen-metal exchange and subsequent sulfonylation. The regioselectivity of the subsequent directed ortho-metallation (DOM) reaction in order to functionalise the C-2 position depends on the nature of the base (LTMP, n- or s-BuLi) and the N-substituent (SEM or Boc) used. The bulk of the N-substituent also strongly influences the yield of the subsequent Suzuki coupling with 2-iodo-3-arylsulfonyl pyrrole derivatives.

Key words

phenylsulfonyl fluoride - 3-sulfonyl pyrrole - directed ortho-metallation - palladium - Suzuki coupling

    References and Notes

  • 1a Pinder AR. In The Alkaloids   Vol. 12:  Grundon MF. Chemical Society; London: 1982. 
    Google Scholar
  • 1b Massiot G. Delaude C. In The Alkaloids   Vol. 27:  Manske RHF. Academic Press; New York: 1986.  Chap. 3.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Hartman DG. Halczenko W. Tetrahedron Lett.  1987,  28:  3241 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4a DeSales J. Greenhouse R. Muchowski JM. J. Org. Chem.  1982,  47:  3668 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 4b Ortiz C. Greenhouse R. Tetrahedron Lett.  1985,  26:  2831 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5a Padwa A. Norman BH. Tetrahedron Lett.  1988,  29:  3041 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 5b Padwa A. Norman BH. J. Org. Chem.  1990,  55:  4801 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6a Burley I. Hewson AT. Synthesis  1995,  1151 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6b For a related approach using 2-substituted vinamidinium salts, see: Gupton JT. Krolikowski DA. Yu RH. Riesinger SW. Sikorski JA. J. Org. Chem.  1990,  55:  4735 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7a Dalla Croce P. Gariboldi P. La Rosa C. J. Heterocycl. Chem.  1987,  24:  1793 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7b Castro J. Coteron JM. Fraile MT. Garcia-Ochoa S. Gomez de las Heras F. Martin-Cuesta A. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  1851 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 7c Chen Z. Trudell ML. Tetrahedron Lett.  1994,  35:  9649 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • This list is not exhaustive. See for examples:
  • 8a Moranta C. Molins-Pujol AM. Pujol MD. Bonal J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  1998,  3285 
    Google Scholar
  • 8b Barnes KD. Ward R. J. Heterocycl. Chem.  1995,  32:  871 
    Google Scholar
  • 9 For the synthesis from TIPS pyrrole, see: Kozikowski AP. Cheng X.-M. J. Org. Chem.  1984,  49:  3239 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ichihara J. Matsuo T. Hanafusa T. Ando T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.  1986,  793 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For difference of reactivity of sulfonyl chloride and fluoride on α-functionalisation of enolate, see:
  • 11a Hirsch E. Hünig S. Reißig H.-U. Chem. Ber.  1982,  115:  399 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11b Kende AS. Mendoza JS. J. Org. Chem.  1990,  55:  1125 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11c Sandanayaka VP. Zask A. Venkatesan AM. Baker J. Tetrahedron Lett.  2001,  42:  4605 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11d For application to sulfonylation of aryl metal, see: Frye LL. Sullivan EL. Cusack KP. Funaro JM. J. Org. Chem.  1992,  57:  697 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11e

    In our case, use of phenylsulfonyl chloride gave almost quantitatively the corresponding 3-Cl pyrrole.
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hasan I. Marinelli ER. Lin L.-CC. Fowler FW. Levy AB. J. Org. Chem.  1981,  46:  157 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 13 The cooperative effects of meta-related directed metallation groups usually give excellent selectivity. See Table 3, p. 885 in: Snieckus V. Chem. Rev.  1990,  90:  879 
    Google Scholar
  • 14a Edwards MP. Ley SV. Lister SG. Palmer BD. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun.  1983,  630 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14b Muchowski JM. Solas DR. J. Org. Chem.  1984,  49:  203 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14c Edwards MP. Ley SV. Lister SG. Palmer BD. Williams DJ. J. Org. Chem.  1984,  49:  3503 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14d Edwards MP. Doherty AM. Ley SV. Organ HM. Tetrahedron  1986,  42:  3723 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Wolfe JP. Singer RA. Yang BH. Buchwald SL. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1999,  121:  9550 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For deprotection under acidic conditions, see:
  • 18a Matthews DP. Whitten JP. McCarthy JR. J. Heterocycl. Chem.  1987,  24:  689 
    Google Scholar
  • 18b

    See also ref. 14d.
    Google Scholar
2

A search for the pyrrole core in WDI database retrieved more than 160 hits.

15

In a previous attempt using 2-Br-3-PhSO2 pyrrole, no Suzuki coupling was effective, possibly due to the acidity of the N-1 hydrogen; results to be published.

17

At 100 °C, the ratio of 10 and 6b was 1.85:1 according to the 1H NMR of the crude reaction. This ratio was at least 95:5 at 50 °C. Lower temperatures were not considered.

19

Regioselectivity of every reaction leading to 13 was confirmed unambiguously by NOE experiments. Compound 13 (pale yellow solid) has the following characteristics: mp 152-153 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 3.67 (s, 3 H), 7.14 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 2 H), 7.42-7.48 (m, 5 H), 7.51-7.55 (m, 1 H), 7.55 (s, 1 H), 9.65 (s, 1 H). 13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 34.4, 124.1, 125.1, 127.2, 127.3, 128.4, 128.6, 130.1, 130.6, 130.8, 132.7, 142.0, 143.1, 180.0. MS (ESI): m/z = 326.0 [M + H]+.

20

Typical Procedures:
Compound 5b: To a solution of 3-bromo-1-[tris(1-methyl­-ethyl)silyl]-1H-pyrrole (12.8 g, 42.4 mmol, 1 equiv) in THF (200 mL) at -78 °C under nitrogen was slowly added n-BuLi (2.5 M in hexanes, 17.8 mL, 44.5 mmol, 1.05 equiv) over 3 min and the resulting mixture was stirred for 15 min at this temperature. Phenylsulfonyl fluoride (7.5 g, 46.6 mmol, 1.1 equiv) in THF (20 mL) was added via syringe over 5 min and the resulting mixture was stirred for 45 min at this temperature, then partitioned between EtOAc (200 mL) and brine (100 mL). The two layers were separated and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (20 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine (2 × 50 mL), dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in THF (200 mL) and TBAF (1 M in THF, 42 mL, 1 equiv) was added and the resulting mixture was stirred for 30 min and then dissolved with EtOAc (200 mL). The organic phase was washed with a sat. aq NaHCO3 solution (3 × 30 mL), dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the residue by flash chromatography on silica gel (isohexane-EtOAc, 3:1 → 1:1) gave 3-(phen­-ylsulfonyl)-1H-pyrrole (5b; 5.53 g, 63%) as a white solid; mp 145-145 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 6.48 (m, 1 H), 6.78 (m, 1 H), 7.38 (m, 1 H), 7.45-7.55 (m, 3 H), 7.92 (m, 2 H).13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 108.4, 120.4, 122.4, 124.6, 127.2, 129.0, 132.6, 143.3. MS (ESI): m/z = 208.1 [M + H]+.
Compound 9: To a solution 3-(phenylsulfonyl)-1-({[2-(trimethylsilyl)ethyl]oxy}methyl)-1H-pyrrole (1.3 g, 3.86 mmol, 1 equiv) in THF (30 mL) at -78 °C under nitrogen was added LTMP (0.5 N in THF, 8.9 mL, 4.45 mmol, 1.15 equiv) over 1 min and the resulting mixture was stirred at this temperature for 50 min. Iodine (1.22 g, 4.82 mmol, 1.25 equiv) in THF (7 mL) was slowly added via syringe over 1 min. After 2 min, the mixture was partitioned between EtOAc (100 mL) and a 10% aq Na2S2O3 solution (100 mL). The two layers were vigorously stirred for 5 min. Brine (10 mL) was added and the two layers were separated. The aqueous layer was extracted with EtOAc (20 mL) and the combined organic layers were washed with brine (50 mL), dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the residue by flash chromatography on silica gel (isohexane-EtOAc, 95:5 → 4:1) gave 2-iodo-3-(phenyl­-sulfonyl)-1-({[2-(trimethylsilyl)ethyl]oxy}methyl)-1H-pyrrole (9; 1.71 g, 96%) as a white solid; mp 75-76 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.02 (s, 9 H), 0.94 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 3.54 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 5.29 (s, 2 H), 6.94 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.13 (d, J = 3.2 Hz, 1 H), 7.52-7.63 (m, 3 H), 8.06 (d, J = 6.4 Hz, 2 H).13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.0, 19.1, 68.0, 76.9, 81.1, 114.4, 127.5, 128.8, 130.3, 131.1, 134.2, 143.8. MS (ESI): m/z = no molecular ion.
Compound 10: A flask was charged under nitrogen with 2-iodo-3-(phenylsulfonyl)-1-({[2-(trimethylsilyl)eth­-yl]oxy}methyl)-1H-pyrrole (9; 1.04 g, 2.25 mmol, 1 equiv), Pd(OAc)2 (50 mg, 0.22 mmol, 0.1 equiv), K3PO4 (952 mg, 4.49 mmol, 2 equiv), 2′-(dicyclohexylphosphanyl)-N,N-dimethyl-2-biphenylamine (176 mg, 0.45 mmol, 0.2 equiv) and PhB(OH)2 (411 mg, 3.37 mmol, 1.5 equiv), then toluene (20 mL) was added and the resulting mixture was stirred at 50 °C for 4 h and then cooled to r.t. The mixture was dissolved with EtOAc (50 mL) and the organic phase was washed with a sat. NaHCO3 solution, then with brine, dried over MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. Purification of the residue by flash chromatography on silica gel (isohexane-EtOAc: 9:1 → 3:1) gave 10 (790 mg, 85%) as pale yellow oil. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.0 (s, 9 H), 0.83 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 3.36 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2 H), 5.01 (s, 2 H), 6.87 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H), 6.92 (d, J = 2.8 Hz, 1 H). 7.26-7.56 (m, 10 H).13C NMR (100.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 0.0, 67.7, 77.4, 111.6, 124.8, 128.4, 129.4, 129.9, 130.1, 130.7, 132.9, 133.6, 137.7, 144.7. MS (ES): m/z = 413.9 [M + H]+.