The Prognostic Importance of Trauma Scoring Systems for Blunt Thoracic Trauma

Abstract

Background: Early identification and aggressive management of blunt thoracic trauma are essential to reduce the significant rates of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the independent predictive value of 5 different trauma scoring systems (Revised Trauma Score [RTS], Trauma and Injury Severity Score [TRISS], Injury Severity Score [ISS], Lung Injury Scale [LIS], and Chest Wall Injury Scale [CWIS]) with respect to prognostic factors such as tube thoracostomy duration, the need for mechanical support and thoracotomy, the length of hospital and ICU stay, morbid conditions, and deaths of patients with blunt thoracic trauma. Methods: The records of 152 patients with blunt thoracic trauma were reviewed and data consisting of the patients' age and gender, blood pressure and respiratory rate on admission, the extent of chest wall and intrathoracic injury, types of associated injuries, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, the need for mechanical support and thoracotomy, tube thoracostomy duration, length of hospital and ICU stay, morbid conditions, and deaths were collected. The relations between the trauma scoring systems and prognostic factors were evaluated by multivariate analysis. Results: The analysis showed that only TRISS was an independent predictor of mortality and only LIS was an independent predictor of morbidity, the need for thoracotomy, and tube thoracostomy duration. TRISS and LIS were independent predictors of the length of ICU stay. ISS, CWIS, and LIS were independent predictors of the need for mechanical support. RTS, TRISS, ISS and LIS were independent predictors of the length of hospital stay. Conclusions: The LIS grade appeared to correlate with the severity of blunt thoracic injury and was found to be the most useful scoring system in predicting the outcomes of these patients.

Key words

cardiovascular surgery - thoracic surgery - myocardial protection

References

• 1 Trunkey D D. Trauma.  Sci Am. 1983;  249 28-35
• 2 Lancey R A, Monahan T S. Correlation of clinical characteristics and outcomes with injury scoring in blunt cardiac trauma.  J Trauma. 2003;  54 509-515
• 3 Sharma B R. The injury scale - a valuable tool for forensic documentation of trauma.  J Clin Forensic Med. 2005;  12 21-28
• 4 Chawda M N, Hildebrand F, Pape H C, Giannoudis P V. Predicting outcome after multiple trauma: which scoring system?.  Injury. 2004;  35 347-358
• 5 Strecker W, Gebhard F, Perl M, Rager J, Buttenschon K, Kinzl L. et al . Biochemical characterization of individual injury pattern and injury severity.  Injury. 2003;  34 879-887
• 6 Baker S P, O'Neil B, Haddon Jr B, Long W B. The Injury Severity Score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care.  J Trauma. 1974;  14 187-196
• 7 Champion H R, Copes W S, Sacco W J, Gann D S, Gennarelli T A, Flanagan M E. A revision of the trauma score.  J Trauma. 1989;  29 623-629
• 8 Boyd C R, Tolson M A, Copes W S. Evaluating trauma care: the TRISS method.  J Trauma. 1987;  27 370-378
• 9 Moore E E, Cognill T H, Jurkovich G J, McAninch J W, Champion H R, Gennarelli T A. et al . Organ injury scaling III: chest wall, abdominal vascular, ureter, bladder and urethra.  J Trauma. 1992;  33 337
• 10 Moore E E, Malangoni M A, Cogbill T H, Shackford S R, Champion H R, Jurkovich G J. et al . Organ injury scaling IV: thoracic vascular, lung, cardiac and diaphragm.  J Trauma. 1994;  36 229
• 11 Bouillon B, Lefering R, Vorweg M, Tiling T, Neugebauer E, Troidl H. Trauma scoring systems: Cologne Validation Study.  J Trauma. 1997;  42 652-658
• 12 Yian E H, Gullahorn L J, Loder R T. Scoring of pediatric orthopaedic polytrauma: correlations of different injury scoring systems and prognosis for hospital course.  J Pediatr Orthop. 2000;  20 203-209
• 13 Wagner A K, Hammond F M, Grigsby J H, Norton H J. The value of trauma scores: predicting discharge after traumatic brain injury.  Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;  79 235-242
• 14 Joosse P, Soedarmo S, Luitse J S, Ponsen K J. Trauma outcome analysis of a Jakarta University Hospital using the TRISS method: validation and limitation in comparison with the Major Trauma Outcome Study. Trauma and Injury Severity Score.  J Trauma. 2001;  51 134-140
• 15 Castello F V, Cassano A, Gregory P, Hammond J. The Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) Score and Injury Severity Score (ISS) for predicting resource utilization and outcome of intensive care in pediatric trauma.  Crit Care Med. 1999;  27 985-988
• 16 Eftekhar B, Zarei M R, Ghodsi M, Moezardalan K, Zargar M, Ketabchi E. Comparing logistic models based on modified GCS motor component with other prognostic tools in prediction of mortality: results of study in 7226 trauma patients.  Injury. 2005;  36 900-904
• 17 Eren S, Balci A E, Ulku R, Cakir O, Eren M N. Thoracic firearm injuries in children: management and analysis of prognostic factors.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2003;  23 888-893
• 18 Athanassiadi K, Gerazounis M, Theakos N. Management of 150 flail chest injuries: analysis of risk factors affecting outcome.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;  26 373-376
• 19 Committee of Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety . Rating the severity of tissue damage: I - the abbreviated scale.  JAMA. 1971;  215 277-280
• 20 Committee of Medical Aspects of Automotive Safety . Rating the severity of tissue damage: II - the comprehensive scale.  JAMA. 1972;  220 717-720
• 21 Asensio J A, Berne J D, Demetriades D, Chan L, Murray J, Falabella A. et al . One hundred and five penetrating cardiac injuries: a 2-year prospective evaluation.  J Trauma. 1998;  44 1073-1082