The Value of Intraoperative Smear Examination of Stereotaxic Brain Specimens

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the importance of intraoperative smear examinations for the final diagnosis of intracerebral stereotaxic procedures. 125 consecutive patients with suspect intracerebral lesions underwent stereotaxic frame-based biopsies after acquisition of computer tomographic and magnetic resonance images. After secondary image processing, including multiplanar visualization of the target region and target definition, a serial biopsy was realized using an aspiration Sedan needle. Biopsy taking was repeated as long as pathological tissue samples were obtained according to the visual impression of the neurosurgeon (group I) or to the first neuropathological result of a smear examination (group II). Retrospective analysis of all cases showed that intraoperative microscopic diagnostics could improve the conditions for a definitive neuropathological diagnosis from 91.8% (56/61 patients, group I) to 96.9% (62/64 patients, group II) (t>0.05). The number of biopsy specimens and the rate of CT-detectable small bleedings differed slightly between both groups and were higher in group II. The duration of surgery and anaesthesia as well as the final neurological outcomes were comparable in both groups. In conclusion, intraoperative smear examination as a kind of “bedside” diagnostics confers a better diagnostic safety and improves the reliability of this minimal invasive manoeuvre.

Brain biopsy - frame-based stereotaxy - smear examination

References

• 1 Chandrasoma PT, Smith MM, Apuzzo MLJ. Stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis of brain masses: comparison of results of biopsy and resected surgical specimen.  Neurosurgy. 1989;  24 160-165
• 2 Cohen DS, Lustgarten JH, Miller E, Khandji AG, Goodman RR. Effects of coregistration of MR to CT images on MR stereotactic accuracy.  J Neurosurg. 1995;  82 772-779
• 3 Debaene A, Gomez A, La Vieille J, Legre CA, Legre J. Stereotactic CT localization and biopsy of brain tumours using the Leksell frame.  J Neuroradiol. 1988;  15 266-275
• 4 Franzini A, Leocata F, Giorgi C, Allegranza A, Servello D, Broggi G. Role of stereotactic biopsy in multifocal brain lesion: considerations on 100 consecutive cases.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1994;  57 957-960
• 5 Hariz MI, Bergenheim AT. A comparative study on ventriculographic and computerized tomography-guided determinations of brain targets in functional stereotaxis.  J Neurosurg. 1990;  73 565-571
• 6 Kelly PJ. Volumetric stereotactic surgical resection of intra-axial brain mass lesion.  Mayo Clin Proc. 1988;  63 1186-1198
• 7 Krieger MD, Chandrasoma PT, Zee CS, Apuzzo ML. Role of stereotactic biopsy in the diagnosis and management of brain tumors.  Semin Surg Oncol. 1998;  14 13-25
• 8 Ohye C. The idea of stereotaxy toward minimally invasive neurosurgery.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2000;  74 185-193
• 9 Gumprecht HK, Widenka DC, Lumenta CB. Brainlab vectorvision neuronavigation system: technology and clinical experiences in 131 cases.  Neurosurgery. 1999;  44 97-105
• 10 Daumas-Duport C, Monsaigneon V, Blond S, Munari C, Musolino A, Chodkiewicz JP, Missir O. Serial stereotactic biopsies and CT scan in gliomas: correlative study in 100 astrocytomas, oligo-astrocytomas and oligodendrocytomas.  J Neurooncol. 1987;  4 317-328
• 11 Dorward NL. Neuronavigation - the surgeon's sextant.  Br J Neurosurg. 1997;  11 101-103
• 12 McInerney J, Roberts DW. Frameless stereotaxy of the brain.  Mt Sinai J Med. 2000;  67 300-310
• 13 Tomancok B, Holl K, Wurm G, Pogady P, Fischer J. Stereotaxiegeführtes versus ultraschallgeführtes Operieren - Ein vergleichender Erfahrungsbericht.  Zentralbl Neurochir. 1996;  57 123-128
• 14 Villalobos H, Germano IM. Clinical evaluation of multimodality registration in frameless stereotaxy.  Comput Aided Surg. 1999;  4 45-49
• 15 Ostertag CB. Reliability of stereotactic brain tumour biopsy. In: Lunsford LD (ed), Modern stereotactic neurosurgery. Nijhoff, Boston 1988 pp 129-136
• 16 Brommeland T, Hennig R. A new procedure for frameless computer navigated stereotaxy.  Acta Neurochir. 2000;  142 443-448
• 17 Ebel H, Rust DS, Scheuerle A. Stellenwert der Stereotaxie in der Neurochirurgie.  Nervenarzt. 1996;  67 650-658
• 18 Hall WA, Martin A, Liu H, Truwit CL. Improving diagnostic yield in brain biopsy: coupling spectroscopic targeting with real-time needle placement.  J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;  13 12-15
• 19 Kondziolka D, Firlik AD, Lunsford LD. Complications of stereotactic brain surgery.  Neurol Clin. 1998;  16 35-54
• 20 Ryan MJ, Erickson RK, Levin DN, Pelizzari CA, MacDonald RL, Dohrmann GJ. Frameless stereotaxy with real-time tracking of patient head movement and retrospective patient-imag registration.  J Neurosurg. 1996;  85 287-292
• 21 Wirtz CR, Tronnier VM, Bonsanto MM, Knauth M, Staubert A, Albert FK, Kunze S. Image-guided neurosurgery with intraoperative MRI: update of frameless stereotaxy and radicality control.  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997;  68 39-43
• 22 Winkler D, Tittgemeyer M, Schwarz J, Preul C, Strecker K, Meixensberger J. The first evaluation of brain shift during functional neurosurgery by deformation field analysis.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;  76 1161-1163
• 23 Bosch DA. Indications for stereotactic biopsy in brain tumors.  Acta Neurochirur. 1980;  54 154-179
• 24 Heilbrun MP, Roberts TS, Apuzzo ML, Wells Jr TH, Sabshin JK. Preliminary experience with Brown-Roberts-Wells (BRW) computerized tomography stereotactic guidance system.  J Neurosurg. 1983;  59 217-222
• 25 Davis DH, Kelly PJ, Marsh WR, Kall Goerss SJ. Computer-assisted stereotactic biopsy of intracranial lesions.  Appl Neurophysiol. 1987;  50 172-177
• 26 Apuzzo MLJ, Chandrasoma PT, Cohen D, Zee CS, Zelman V. Computed imaging stereotaxy: experience and perspective related to 500 procedures applied to brain masses.  Neurosurgery. 1987;  20 930-937

Correspondence