Motor Evoked Potentials Enable Differentiation between Motor and Sensory Branches of Peripheral Nerves in Animal Experiments

ABSTRACT

Differentiation between motor and sensory fascicles is frequently necessary in reconstructive peripheral nerve surgery. The goal of this experimental study was to verify if centrally motor evoked potentials (MEP) could be implemented to differentiate sensory from motor fascicles, despite the well-known intermingling between nerve fascicles along their course to their distant periphery. This new procedure would enable surgeons to use MEP for placing nerve grafts at corresponding fascicles in the proximal and distal stumps without the need to use time-consuming staining. In ten sheep, both ulnar nerves were exposed at the terminal bifurcation between the last sensory and motor branch. Animals were then relaxed to avoid volume conduction. On central stimulation, the evoked nerve compound action potentials were simultaneously recorded from both terminal branches. In all cases, neurogenic motor nerve action potentials were recorded only from the terminal motor branch. The conclusion was that MEPs can be used for intraoperative differentiation between sensory and motor nerves. Further studies are necessary to develop this method for in situ measurements on intact nerve trunks.

KEYWORDS

Sensory-motor differentiation - Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) - peripheral nerve surgery

REFERENCES

• 1 Darden 2nd B V, Hatley M K, Owen J H. Neurogenic motor evoked-potential monitoring in anterior cervical surgery.  J Spinal Disord. 1996;  9 485-493
• 2 Freilinger G, Gruber H, Holle J, Mandl H. The technic of “sensorimotor” differentiated fascicular suture of peripheral nerves.  Handchirurgie. 1975;  7 133-137
• 3 Ganel A, Engel J, Rimon S. Intraoperative identification of peripheral nerve fascicle. Use of a new rapid biochemical assay technique.  Orthop Rev. 1986;  15 669-672
• 4 Gaul J S. Electrical fascicle identification as an adjunct to nerve repair.  J Hand Surg Am. 1983;  8 289-296
• 5 Girsch W, Deutinger M, Bayer G S et al.. Sensorimotor differentiated reconstruction of peripheral nerves-a method of intraoperative identification of motor fascicles.  Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir [in German]. 1996;  28 181-186
• 6 Haghighi S, York D H, Gaines R W, Oro J J. Monitoring of motor tracts with spinal cord stimulation.  Spine. 1994;  19 1518-1524
• 7 He Y S, Zhong S Z. Acetylcholinesterase: a histochemical identification of motor and sensory fascicles in human peripheral nerve and its use during operation.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;  82 125-132
• 8 Hoffmann R. Checklisten der aktuellen Medizin, Checkliste Handchirurgie. Stuttgart Thieme 1999
• 9 Kai Y, Owen J H, Lenke L G, Bridwell K H, Oakley D M, Sugioka Y. Use of sciatic neurogenic motor evoked potentials versus spinal potentials to predict early-onset neurologic deficits when intervention is still possible during overdistraction.  Spine. 1993;  18 1134-1139
• 10 Kanaya F, Ogden L, Breidenbach W C, Tsai T M, Scheker L. Sensory and motor fibre differentiation with Karnovsky staining.  J Hand Surg Am. 1991;  16 851-858
• 11 Karnovsky M J, Roots L. A “direct colouring” thiocholine method for cholinesterases.  J Histochem Cytochem. 1964;  12 219-221
• 12 Kato H, Minami A, Kobayashi M, Takahara M, Ogino T. Functional results of low median and ulnar nerve repair with intraneural fascicular dissection and electrical fascicular orientation.  J Hand Surg Am. 1998;  23 471-482
• 13 Leppanen R, Madigan R, Sears C, Maguire J, Wallace S, Captain J. Intraoperative collision studies demonstrate descending spinal cord stimulated evoked potentials and ascending somatosensory evoked potentials are mediated through common pathways.  J Clin Neurophysiol. 1999;  16 170
• 14 Sunderland S. Nerve Injuries and their Repair : a Critical Appraisal. Edinburgh; Churchill Livingstone 1991
• 15 Owen J H. Intraoperative stimulation of the spinal cord for prevention of spinal cord injury.  Adv Neural. 1993;  63 271-288
• 16 Owen J H. The application of intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity.  Spine. 1999;  24 2649-2662
• 17 Owen J H, Bridwell K H, Grubb R, Jenny A, Allen B, Padberg A M. The clinical application of neurogenic motor evoked potentials to monitor spinal cord function during surgery.  Spine. 1991;  16(8 Suppl) S385-390
• 18 Owen J H, Jenny A B, Naito M, Weber K, Bridwell K H, McGhee R. Effects of spinal cord lesioning on somatosensory and neurogenic motor evoked potentials.  Spine. 1989;  14 673-682
• 19 Owen J H, Laschinger J, Bridwell K, Shimon S, Nielsen C, Dunlap J. Sensitivity and specificity of somatosensory and neurogenic motor evoked potentials in animals and humans.  Spine. 1988;  13 1111-1118
• 20 Toleikis J R, Skelly J P, Cartvin A O, Burkus J K. Spinally elicited peripheral nerve responses are sensory rather than motor.  Clin Neurophysiol. 2000;  111 736-742
• 21 Turkof E, Monsivais J, Dechtyar I, Bellolo H, Millesi H, Mayr N. Motor evoked potential as a reliable method to verify the conductivity of anterior spinal roots in brachial plexus surgery: an experimental study on goats.  J Reconstr Microsurg. 1995;  11 357-362
• 22 Vandeput J, Tanner J C, Huypens L. Electro-physiological orientation of the cut ends in primary peripheral nerve repair.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;  44 378-382