Insbesondere aufgrund von technischen Verbesserungen und einer höheren Verfügbarkeit von Systemen mit der Möglichkeit zur Untersuchung des Herzens stehen mittlerweile eine Vielzahl an Daten über die Diagnostik der koronaren Herzerkrankung (KHK) mit der Magnetresonanztomografie (MR) zur Verfügung. Die Magnetresonanztomografie bietet sowohl die Möglichkeit zur funktionellen Beurteilung der koronaren Herzerkrankung, wie Ischämie und Vitalität, als auch der morphologischen Evaluierung, wie Koronarangiografie und Gefäßwanddarstellung. Dieser Artikel fasst den derzeitig Stand der Magnetresonanztomografie bei der Diagnostik der koronaren Herzerkrankung zusammen.
Due to technical improvements and due to a higher availability of systems with the possibility of cardiac examination more and more evidence of magnetic resonance (MR) as an non invasive diagnostic tool for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) is available. Magnetic resonance offers both, functional studies for the evaluation of ischemia and viability and morphological studies such as coronary angiography and vessel wall imaging. This review presents the current state of magnetic resonance in the evaluation of coronary artery disease.
Key Words
magnetic resonance - coronary artery disease - ischemia, viability - coronary angiography
Literatur
-
1
Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Udelson JE.
Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2002;
39
1151-1158
-
2
Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Vasken. et al. .
Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart.
Circulation.
2002;
105
539-542
-
3
Choi KM, Kim RJ, Gubernikoff G. et al. .
Transmural extent of acute myocardial infarction predicts long-term improvement in contractile function.
Circulation.
2001;
104
1101-1107
-
4
Danias PG, Roussakis A, Ioannidis JP.
Diagnostic performance of coronary magnetic resonance angiography as compared against conventional X-ray angiography: a meta-analysis.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2004;
44
1867-1876
-
5
Fayad ZA.
MR imaging for the noninvasive assessment of atherothrombotic plaques.
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am.
2003;
11
101-113
-
6
Giang TH, Nanz D, Coulden R. et al. .
Detection of coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging with various contrast medium doses: first European multi-centre experience.
Eur Heart J.
2004;
25
1657-1665
-
7
Hundley WG, Hamilton CA, Thomas MS. et al. .
Utility of fast cine magnetic resonance imaging and display for the detection of myocardial ischemia in patients not well suited for second harmonic stress echocardiography [see comments].
Circulation.
1999;
100
1697-1702
-
8
Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A. et al. .
The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction.
N Engl J Med.
2000;
343
1445-1453
-
9
Kim WY, Danias PG, Stuber M. et al. .
Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses.
N Engl J Med.
2001;
345
1863-1869
-
10
Klein C, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM. et al. .
Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography.
Circulation.
2002;
105
162-167
-
11
Nagel E, Klein C, Paetsch I. et al. .
Magnetic resonance perfusion measurements for the noninvasive detection of coronary artery disease.
Circulation.
2003;
108
432-437
-
12
Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Bocksch W. et al. .
Noninvasive diagnosis of ischemia-induced wall motion abnormalities with the use of high-dose dobutamine stress MRI: comparison with dobutamine stress echocardiography [see comments].
Circulation.
1999;
99
763-770
-
13
Nagel E, Lehmkuhl HB, Klein C. et al. .
Einfluß der Bildqualität auf die Genauigkeit der nichtinvasiven Ischämiediagnostik mit der Dobutamin- Streßmagnetresonanztomographie im Vergleich zur Dobutamin-Streßechokardiographie.
Z Kardiol.
1999;
88
622-630
-
14
Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB. et al. .
Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus panel report.
Eur Heart J.
2004;
25
1940-1965
-
15
Schwitter J, von Schulthess GK.
MR perfusion imaging: correlation with PET and quantitative angiography.
Magma.
2000;
11
71-72
-
16
Spuentrup E, Botnar RM.
Coronary magnetic resonance imaging: visualization of the vessel lumen and the vessel wall and molecular imaging of arteriothrombosis.
Eur Radiol.
2006;
16
1-14
-
17
Wahl A, Paetsch I, Gollesch A. et al. .
Safety and feasibility of high-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance for diagnosis of myocardial ischaemia: experience in 1000 consecutive cases.
Eur Heart J.
2004;
25
1230-1236
-
18
Wahl A, Paetsch I, Roethemeyer S. et al. .
High-dose dobutamine-atropine stress cardiovascular MR imaging after coronary revascularization in patients with wall motion abnormalities at rest.
Radiology.
2004;
233
210-216
-
19
Wellnhofer E, Olariu A, Klein C. et al. .
Magnetic resonance low-dose dobutamine test is superior to SCAR quantification for the prediction of functional recovery.
Circulation.
2004;
109
2172-2174
Anschrift für die Verfasser
Dr. Christoph Klein
Innere Medizin/Kardiologie
Deutsches Herzzentrum
Augustenburger Platz 1
13353 Berlin
