PDF herunterladen
Endoscopy 2006; 38(11): 1065-1069
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944849
DDW highlights
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Barrett’s esophagus

A.  Rastogi1 , P.  Sharma1
  • 1 Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

Publikationsdatum:
17. November 2006 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Introduction

The last few decades have seen an appreciable rise in the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in Western countries [1] [2] [3] [4]. The majority of esophageal cancers in the USA and Western Europe are now adenocarcinomas [2] [4]. The prognosis after a diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma is generally poor, with the 5-year survival rate in patients with advanced disease being less than 20 % [5] [6]. Since Barrett’s esophagus is a recognized risk factor for esophageal adenocarcinoma, there has been a sustained research interest in this clinical entity. Several interesting abstracts on Barrett’s esophagus were presented at Digestive Disease Week (DDW) in Los Angeles this year.

References

  • 1 Devesa S S, Blot W J, Fraumeni J F jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States.  Cancer. 1998;  83 2049-2053
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Blot W J, Devesa S S, Fraumeni J F jr. Continuing climb in rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma: an update.  JAMA. 1993;  270 1320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pera M, Cameron A J, Trastek V F. et al . Increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction.  Gastroenterology. 1993;  104 510-513
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Pohl H, Welch H G. The role of overdiagnosis and reclassification in the marked increase of esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;  97 142-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Daly J M, Karnell L H, Menck H R. National Cancer Data Base report on esophageal carcinoma.  Cancer. 1996;  78 1820-1828
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Provenzale D, Kemp J A, Arora S, Wong J B. A guide for surveillance of patients with Barrett’s esophagus.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 670-680
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Van Baal J, Milano F, Rygiel A. et al . A comparative analysis by SAGE of gene expression profiles of Barrett’s esophagus, normal squamous esophagus, and gastric cardia.  Gastroenterology. 2005;  129 1274-1281
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Van Baal J, Milano F, Buttar N S. et al . Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-4 mediated transformation of inflamed squamous esophageal mucosa into Barrett’s esophagus [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 (4 Suppl 2) A76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Moons L MG, Kusters J G, van Delft J. et al . A pro-inflammatory IL-10/1L-12 gene profile is associated with an increased risk for developing Barrett’s esophagus [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 (4 Suppl 2) A76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Feagins L A, Zhang H Y, Quinones M. et al . Acid exerts an anti-proliferative effect in non-neoplastic Barrett’s epithelial cells by delaying cell cycle progression [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 (4 Suppl 2) A77
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Sharma P, Armstrong D, Bergman J. et al . The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett’s esophagus: the Prague C and M criteria [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 (4 Suppl 2) A121
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Soni A, Sampliner R E, Sonnenberg A. Screening for high-grade dysplasia in gastroesophageal reflux disease is it cost-effective?.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 2086-2093
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Inadomi J M, Sampliner R, Lagergren J. et al . Screening and surveillance for Barrett’s esophagus in high-risk groups: a cost-utility analysis.  Ann Intern Med. 2003;  138 176-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Sharma P, McQuaid K, Dent J. et al . A critical review of the diagnosis and management of Barrett’s esophagus: the AGA Chicago workshop.  Gastroenterology. 2004;  127 310-330
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lin O, Schembre D, Kozarek R. Blinded comparison of esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional endoscopy for diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus in patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 AB103
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Sharma P, Rastogi A, Esquivel R. et al . Accuracy of wireless capsule endoscopy for the detection of Barrett’s esophagus [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 (4 Suppl 2) A262
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Sampliner R E. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology . Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1888-1895
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Levine D S, Haggitt R C, Blount P L. et al . An endoscopic biopsy protocol can differentiate high-grade dysplasia from early adenocarcinoma in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 1993;  105 40-50
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Kariv R, Plesec T, Bronner M. et al . The Seattle protocol for high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: it may not be as good as we think [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 (4 Suppl 2) A120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Puli S, Rastogi A, Mathur S. et al . Development of esophageal adenocarcinoma in patients with Barrett’s esophagus and high grade dysplasia undergoing surveillance: a meta-analysis and systematic review [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63(5) AB83
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Sampliner R E, Fennerty B, Garewal H S. Reversal of Barrett’s esophagus with acid suppression and multipolar electrocoagulation: preliminary results.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 532-535
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Swisher S G, Deford L, Merriman K W. et al . Effect of operative volume on morbidity, mortality, and hospital use after esophagectomy for cancer.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;  119 1126-1132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Peters F, Curvers W, Kara M. et al . Stepwise radical endoscopic resection for complete removal of Barrett’s esophagus with early neoplasia [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 AB133
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Peters F, van Ball J, Rygiel A. et al . Stepwise endoscopic resection of the whole Barrett’s esophagus in patients with early neoplasia effectively removes all genetic alterations from the esophageal epithelium [abstract].  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 (4 Suppl 2) A129
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Overholt B F, Lightdale C J, Wang K K. et al . Photodynamic therapy with porfimer sodium for ablation of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus: international, partially blinded, randomized phase III trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 488-498
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Overholt B, Wang K, Burdick S. et al . A 5-year randomized phase III trial of efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy using porfimer sodium in high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 AB84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Pech O, Behrens A, May A. et al . Curative endoscopic therapy for Barrett’s early cancer and high grade dysplasia: long-term results in 304 patients [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 AB84
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Fleischer D, Sharma V, Reymunde A. et al . Circumferential RF ablation for non-dysplastic Barrett’s esophagus (NDBE) using the HALO360 ablation system (AIM trial): one-year follow-up of 100 patients [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 AB127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

P. Sharma, M. D.

Gastroenterology Section 111

Veterans Association Medical Center · 4801 East Linwood Boulevard · Kansas City, Missouri · USA

Fax: +1-816-922-4692

eMail: psharma@kumc.edu