RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-933472
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Strategie des chirurgischen Vorgehens beim hilären Cholangiokarzinom
Surgical Approach in Hilar CholangiocarcinomaPublikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
31. Mai 2006 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/zblchir/200603/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-2006-933472-1.jpg)
Zusammenfassung
Die Operation ist die entscheidende lebensverlängernde Therapie des hilären Cholangiokarzinoms. Das chirurgische Vorgehen beruht auf retrospektiven Analysen. Da die Prognose nicht resezierter Patienten nur etwa 6 Monate beträgt, ist das Erzielen einer hohen Resektionsrate entscheidend. Die hierfür erforderliche diagnostische Abklärung des longitudinalen Tumorwachstums gelingt am besten durch perkutane transhepatische Cholangiographie. Im Ergebnis der Diagnostik wird die Tumorausdehnung eher über- als unterschätzt. Die Resektion sollte als en-bloc-Resektion von Tumor und Leber erfolgen. Unsicher ist, ob Art der Leberresektion, Umfang der Lymphadenektomie und die prinzipielle Mitresektion von Gefäßen die Prognose beeinflussen. Die Patienten im eigenen Krankengut überlebten nach Resektion 813, nach explorativer Laparotomie im Median 214 Tage. Die Resektionsrate betrug 71 %, die Rate kurativer Resektionen 72 %, die Operationsletalität 7 %. In der multivariaten Analyse war der Lymphknotenbefall der einzige signifikante prognostische Parameter.
Abstract
Surgery is the decisive life-prolongating treatment in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surgery is mainly based on empiric data. Since patients without surgery have only about 6 months to survive, to achieve a high resection rate is crucial for these patients. During diagnostic workup, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography results in the most reliable assessment of longitudinal tumor growth. The extent of the tumor is frequently overestimated leading to the consequence of exluding the patients from surgery. En-bloc resection of the tumor and the adjacent liver should be the preferred surgical approach. So far, surgical radicality (right trisegmentectomy, extended lymphadenectomy and vascular resection) has not been demonstrated to prolong survival. In our experience with 117 patients, median survival of patients following resection was 813 days, whereas patients not amenable to resection survived for 214 days only. Resection rate and the rate of curative resections were 71 and 72 %, respectively, operative mortality was 7 %. In the multivariate analysis, lymph node involvement proved to be the only prognostic marker.
Schlüsselworte
hiläres Cholangiokarzinom - Resektion - Diagnostik - Prognose
Key words
hilar cholangiocarcinoma - surgery - diagnosis - prognosis
Literatur
- 1 Altehoefer C, Ghanem N, Furtwangler A, Schneider B, Langer M. Breathhold unenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiography in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2001; 16 188-192
- 2 Capussotti L, Muratore A, Polastri R, Ferrero A, Massucco P. Liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. In-hospital martality and longterm survival. J Am Coll Surg. 2002; 195 641-647
- 3 Dimick J B, Wainess R M, Cowan J A, Upchurch Jr G R, Knol J A, Colletti L M. National trends in the use and outcomes of hepatic resection. J Am Coll Surg. 2004; 199 31-38
- 4 Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Nagasaka T, Nimura Y. Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Audit of 52 consecutive cases. Ann Surg. 2003; 238 720-727
- 5 Figueras J, Llado L, Valls C, Serrano T, Ramos E, Fabregat J, Rafecas A, Torras J, Jaurrieta E. Changing strategies in diagnosis and management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Liver Transpl. 2001; 6 786-794
- 6 Fritscher-Ravens A, Broering D C, Knoefel W T, Rogiers X, Swain P, Thonke F, Bobrowski C, Topalidis T, Soehendra N. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in potentially operable patients with negative brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99 45-51
- 7 Gerhards M F, van Gulik T M, Gonzalez Gonzalez D, Rauws E A, Gouma D J. Results of postoperative radiotherapy for resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. World J Surg. 2003; 27 173-179
- 8 Gerhards M F, van Gulik T M, de Wit L T, Obertop H, Gouma D J. Evaluation of morbidity and mortality after resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. A single center experience. Surgery. 2000; 127 395-404
- 9 Gerhards M F, Vos P, van Gulik T M, Rauws E A, Bosma A, Gouma D J. Incidence of benign lesions in patients resected for suspicious hilar obstruction. Br J Surg. 2001; 88 48-51
- 10 Golfieri R, Giampalma E, Muzzi C, Maffei M, Amore B, Grazia C, Frezza G, Galuppi A, Gavelli G. Unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma: combined percutaneous and radiotherapeutic treatment. Radiol Med (Torino). 2001; 101 495-502
- 11 Guthrie J A, Ward J, Robinson P J. Hilar cholangiocarcinomas. T2-weighted spin-echo and gadolinium-enhanced FLASH MR imaging. Radiology. 1996; 201 347-351
- 12 Han J K, Choi B I, Kim T K, Kim S W, Han M C, Yeon K M. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Thin-section spiral CT findings with cholangiographic correlation. Radiographics. 1997; 17 1475-1485
- 13 IJitsma A J, Appeltans B M, de Jong K P, Porte R J, Peeters P M, Slooff M J. Extrahepatic bile duct resection in combination with liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. A report of 42 cases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004; 8 686-694
- 14 Jarnagin W R, Fong Y, DeMatteo R P, Gonen M, Burke E C, Bodniewicz W R, Youssef B AM, Klimstra D, Blumgart L H. Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2001; 234 507-517
- 15 Kaiho T, Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K, Ambiru S, Shimizu H, Shimizu Y, Okuno A, Nozawa S, Nukui Y, Nakajima N. Treatment of unresectable hepatic hilar malignancies with self-expanding metallic stents. Hepatogastroenterology. 1999; 46 2781-2790
- 16 Kawarada Y, Das B C, Naganuma T, Tabata M, Taoka H. Surgical treatment of hilar bile duct carcinoma. Experience with 25 consecutive hepatectomies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002; 6 617-624
- 17 Klatskin G. Adenocarcinoma of the hepatic duct at its bifurcation within the porta hepatis. An unusual tumor with distinctive clinical and pathological features. Am J Med. 1965; 28 241-256
- 18 Klempnauer J, Ridder G J, Wasielewski R von, Werner M, Weimann A, Pichlmayr R. Resectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors. J Clin Oncol. 1997; 15 947-954
- 19 Kitagawa Y, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Sano T, Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N, Nimura Y. Lymph node metastasis from hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Audit of 110 patients who underwent regional and paraaortic node dissection. Ann Surg. 2001; 233 385-392
- 20 Kokudo N, Makuuchi M. Current role of portal vein embolization/hepatic artery chemoembolization. Surg Clin North Am. 2004; 84 643-657
- 21 Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, Yamasaki S, Makuuchi M. Improved surgical results for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with procedures including major hepatic resection. Ann Surg. 1999; 230 663-671
- 22 Launois B, Reding R, Lebeau G, Buard J L. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. French experience in a collective survey of 552 extrahepatic bile duct cancers. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000; 7 128-134
- 23 Lee S G, Lee Y J, Park K M, Hwang S, Min P C. One hundred and eleven liver resections for bile duct cancer. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000; 7 135-141
- 24 Lillemoe K D, Cameron J L. Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. The Johns Hopkins approach. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000; 7 115-121
- 25 Manfredi R, Brizi M G, Masselli G, Vecchioli A, Marano P. Malignant biliary hilar stenosis. MR cholangiography compared with direct cholangiography. Radiol Med (Torino). 2001; 102 48-54
- 26 Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K, Ambiru S, Chimizu H, Chimizu Y, Akuno A, Nozawa S, Nukui Y, Yoshitomi H, Nakajiwa N. Aggressive surgical approaches to hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepatic or local resection?. Surgery. 1998; 123 131-136
- 27 Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K, Ambiru S, Shimizu H, Okaya T, Shinmura K, Nakajima N. Parenchyma-preserving hepatectomy in the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Am Coll Surg. 1999; 189 575-583
- 28 Mizumoto R, Kawarada Y, Suzuki H. Surgical treatment of hilar carcinoma of the bile duct. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1986; 162 153-158
- 29 Munoz L, Roayaie S, Maman D, Fishbein T, Seiner P, Emre S, Miller C. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma involving the portal vein bifurcation. Long-term results after resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002; 9 237-241
- 30 Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kono S, Uesaka K, Kin Y, Kutsuna Y, Hayakawa N, Yamamoto H. Right or left portal vein embolization before hepatic trisegmentectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma. Surgery. 1995; 117 677-681
- 31 Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J. et al . Preoperative management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Hepatobil Pancreat Surg. 1995; 2 215-223
- 32 Nagino M, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kanai M, Uesaka K, Hayakawa N, Yamamoto H, Kondo S, Nishio H. Segmental liver resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1998; 45 7-13
- 33 Nakajima T, Kondo Y, Miyazaki M, Okui K. A histopathologic study of 102 cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Histologic classification and modes of spreading. Hum Pathol. 1988; 19 1228-1234
- 34 Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein W O, Lohmann R, Radke C, Kling N, Wex C, Lobeck H, Hintze R. Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 1999; 230 808-819
- 35 Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Settmacher U, Thelen A, Benckert C, Lopez-Hanninen E, Hintze R E. Surgical management of proximal bile duct cancer. Extended right lobe resection increases resectability and radicality. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2003; 388 194-200
- 36 Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J. et al . Hepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus. World J Surg. 1990; 14 535-543
- 37 Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Nagino M, Kanai M. Technique of inserting multiple biliary drains and management. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 1995; 42 323-331
- 38 Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Nagino M, Uesaka K, Oda K, Sano T, Yamamoto H, Hayakawa N. Aggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Nagoya experience. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000; 7 155-162
- 39 Ortner M E, Caca K, Berr F, Liebetruth J, Mansmann U, Huster D, Voderholzer W, Schachschal G, Mossner J, Lochs H. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma. A randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2003; 125 1355-1363
- 40 Otto G, Romaneehsen B, Bittinger F, Mönch C, Thelen M, Hadian A, Lohse A W. Preoperative imaging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: surgical evaluation of standard practises. Z Gastroenterol. 2004; 42 9-14
- 41 Otto G, Romaneehsen B, Hoppe-Lotichius M, Bittinger F. Hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Resectability and radicality after routine diagnostic imaging. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004; 11 310-318
- 42 Puhalla H, Gruenberger T, Pokorny H, Soliman T, Wrba F, Sponer U, Winkler T, Ploner M, Raderer U, Steininger R, Muhlbacher F, Laengle F. Resection of hilar cholangiocarcinomas. Pivotal prognostic factors and impact of tumor sclerosis. World J Surg. 2003; 27 680-684
- 43 Takada T. Is preoperative drainage necessary according to evidence-based medicine?. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2001; 8 58-64
- 44 Tillich M, Mischinger H J, Preisegger K H, Rabl H, Szolar D H. Multiphasic helical CT in diagnosis and staging of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171 651-658
- 45 Tojima Y, Nagino M, Ebata T, Uesaka K, Kamiya J, Nimura Y. Immunohistochemically demonstrated lymph node micrometastasis and prognosis in patients with otherwise node-negative hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg. 2003; 237 201-207
- 46 Tsao J I, Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Hayakawa N, Kondo S, Nagino M, Miyachi M, Kanai M, Uesaka K, Oda K, Rossi R L, Braasch J W, Dugan J M. Management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Comparison of an American and Japanese experience. Ann Surg. 2000; 232 166-174
- 47 Wiedmann M W, Berr R, Schiefke I, Witzigmann H, Kohlhaw K, Mossner J, Caca K. Photodynamic therapy in patients with non-resectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. 5-year follow-up ot a prospective phase II study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004; 60 68-75
- 48 Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Kanazawa S, Charnsangavej C, Wallace S. Parenchymal changes of the liver in cholangiocarcinoma. CT evaluation. Gastrointest Radiol. 1992; 17 161-166
- 49 Zidi S H, Prat F, Le Guen O, Rondeau Y, Pelletier G. Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures. Gut. 2000; 46 103-106
Prof. Dr. G. Otto
Abteilung für Transplantationschirurgie/Chirurgie von Leber, Gallenwegen und Pankreas · Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
Langenbeckstr. 1
55101 Mainz
Telefon: +49/61 31/17 36 13
Fax: +49/61 31/17 55 54
eMail: otto@transplantation.klinik.uni-mainz.de