Synthesis 2006(11): 1791-1802  
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926466
PAPER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Synthesis of Novel Conformationally Constrained Pyrazolo[4,3-c]quinoline Derivatives as Potential Ligands for the Estrogen Receptor

Konstantinos M. Kasiotisa, Nikolas Fokialakisb, Serkos A. Haroutounian*a
a Chemistry Laboratory, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera odos 75, Athens 11855, Greece
Fax: +30(210)5294265; e-Mail: sehar@aua.gr;
b Division of Pharmacology and Chemistry of Natural Products, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Zografou 15771, Athens, Greece
Further Information

Publication History

Received 10 August 2005
Publication Date:
27 April 2006 (online)

Abstract

The preparation of three novel classes of pyrazolo[4,3-c]quinoline derivatives is reported. The easily accessible 2,3-dihydro-1H-quinolin-4-ones were used as the starting materials and were functionalized with three different acylating agents affording their respective constrained core substrates. The latter by condensation with phenyl(or 4-methoxyphenyl)hydrazines and subsequent debenzylation or demethylation provided the desired pyrazole derivatives. Some interesting features emerged with respect to the regioselectivity and mechanism of these reactions.

    References

  • 1 Gao H. Katzenellenbogen JA. Garg R. Hansch C. Chem. Rev.  1999,  99:  723 
  • 2 Magarian RA. Overaacre LB. Singh S. Curr. Med. Chem.  1994,  1:  61 
  • 3 Grundy J. Chem. Rev.  1957,  57:  281 
  • 4 Compton DR. Carlson KE. Katzenellenbogen JA. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  2004,  14:  5681 
  • 5 Jordan VC. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.  1999,  10:  312 
  • 6 Meegan MJ. Hughes RB. Lloyd DG. Williams DC. Zisterer DM. J. Med. Chem.  2001,  44:  1072 
  • 7 Arnal JF. Gourdy P. Bayard LF. Filippe C. Drug Discov. Today: Dis. Model.  2004,  23:  213 
  • 8 Delmas PD. Bjarnason NH. Mitlak BH. Ravoux AC. Shah AS. Huster WJ. Draper M. Christianson C. N. Engl. J. Med.  1997,  337:  1641 
  • 9 Grese TA. Dogde JA. Curr. Pharm. Des.  1998,  4:  71 
  • 10 Kuiper GG. Enmark E. Pelto-Huikko M. Nilsson S. Gustafsson J.-A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.  1996,  93:  5925 
  • 11 Pettersson K. Gustafsson JA. Ann. Rev. Physiol.  2001,  63:  165 
  • 12 Nilsson S. Kuiper G. Gustafsson JA. Trends Endocrinol. Metab.  1998,  9:  387 
  • 13 Stauffer SR. Coletta CJ. Tedesco R. Nishigushi G. Carlson K. Sun J. Katzenellenbogen BS. Katzenellenbogen JA. J. Med. Chem.  2000,  44:  4934 
  • 14 Fink BE. Mortensen DS. Stauffer SR. Aron ZD. Katzenellenbogen JA. Chem. Biol.  1999,  6:  205 
  • 15 Stauffer SR. Huang YR. Aron ZD. Coletta CJ. Sun J. Katzenellenbogen BS. Katzenellenbogen JA. Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2001,  9:  151 
  • 16 Lin X. Huebner V. Curr. Opin. Drug Discov. Dev.  2000,  3:  383 
  • 17 Baraldi PG. Borea PA. Trends Pharmacol. Sci.  2000,  21:  456 
  • 18 Colleta V. Catarzi D. Varano F. Cecchi L. Filacchiono G. Martini C. Lucacchini A. J. Med. Chem.  2000,  43:  3118 
  • 19 Eskildsen J. Østergaard N. Vedsø P. Begtrup M. Tetrahedron  2002,  58:  7635 
  • 20 Kuo S.-C. Lee H.-Z. Juang J.-P. Lin Y.-T. Wu T.-S. Chang J.-J. Lednicer D. Paull KD. Lin C.-M. Hamel E. Lee K.-H. J. Med. Chem.  1993,  36:  1146 
  • 21 Edwards JP. Higuchi RI. Winn DT. Pooley CLF. Caferro TR. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  1999,  7:  1003 
  • 22 Booker-Milburn KI. Dunkin IR. Kelly FC. Khalaf AI. David A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1  1997,  3261 
  • 23 Wiles C. Watts P. Haswell SJ. Pombo-Villar E. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  2945