Comparison of Ultrasonically Activated Scalpel and Traditional Technique in Radial Artery Harvesting: Clinical Research

Abstract

Background: Use of the radial artery (RA) as a conduit in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of this study was to compare the results of two different RA harvesting techniques. Use of the harmonic scalpel is suggested to be safe and additionally reduces spasm rates. Material and Methods: From January 2000, the first 200 consecutive patients who underwent RA harvesting for CABG were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups. RA was harvested by means of electrocautery + hemoclips in Group I and by harmonic scalpel + hemoclips in Group II. 30 patients (30 %) in Group I and 25 patients (25 %) in Group II were female. Mean age was 53.9 ± 9.3 and 53.5 ± 8.4 years in Group I and Group II, respectively. Hand circulation and ulnar collateral flow was assured with a modified Allen test in all patients preoperatively. During the operation perfusion of the hand was monitored by oximetric plethysmography. The distal end of RA was also explored and clamped with a soft vascular clamp to evaluate the saturation values in the groups. During the clamping period, oxygen saturation values did not decrease so we harvested RAs in all patients. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups with the exception of the RA harvesting times, the postoperative analgesia requirements, the rate of vasospasm and the need for hemostatic clips. Conclusion: Harmonic scalpel usage in RA harvesting causes less trauma to adjacent tissues; the analgesia requirements, the rate of vasospasm, the RA harvesting time and the need of hemostatic clips decreases. We conclude that the use of a harmonic scalpel for radial artery harvesting is safer and faster than the routine technique.

Key words

cardiovascular surgery - myocardial infarction - coronary bypass surgery

References

• 1 Chen A H, Nakao T, Brodman R F. et al . Early postoperative angiographic assessment of radial artery grafts used for coronary artery bypass grafting.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;  111 1208-1212
• 2 Tatoulis J, Buxton B F, Fuller J A. Bilateral radial artery grafts in coronary reconstruction: Technique and early results in 261 patients.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  66 714-719
• 3 Buxton B F, Fuller J A, Tatoulis J. Evolution of complete arterial grafting for coronary artery disease.  Tex Heart Inst J. 1998;  25 17-23
• 4 Trick W E, Scheckler W E, Tokars J I. et al . Risk factors for radial artery harvest site infection following coronary artery bypass graft surgery.  Clin Infect Dis. 2000;  30 270-275
• 5 Sajja L R, Mannam G, Sompalli S. Neurologic hand complications after radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;  123 585-586
• 6 Galajda Z, Szentkiralyi I, Peterffy A. Neurologic complications after radial artery harvesting.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;  123 194-195
• 7 Meharwal Z S, Trehan N. Functional status of the hand after radial artery harvesting: Results in 3977 cases.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 1557-1561
• 8 Denton T A, Trento L, Cohen M. et al . Radial artery harvesting for coronary bypass operations: Neurologic complications and their potential mechanisms.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  121 951-956
• 9 Posacıoglu H, Atay Y, Cetindal B. et al . Easy harvesting of radial artery with ultrasonically activated scalpel.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;  65 984-985
• 10 Higami T, Kozawa S, Asada T. et al . Skeletonisation and harvest of the internal thoracic artery with an ultrasonic scalpel.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  70 307-308
• 11 Wright C B, Barner H B, Gao A, Obial R, Bandy B, Perry L, Ronan J, Kelly C R. The advantages of the harmonic scalpel for the harvesting of radial arteries for coronary artery bypass.  Heart Surg Forum. 2001;  4 226-229 229-230
• 12 Georghiou G P, Stamler A, Berman M, Sharoni E, Vidne B A, Sahar G. Advantages of the ultrasonic harmonic scalpel for radial artery harvesting.  Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2005;  13 58-60
• 13 Ronan J W, Perry L A, Barner H B, Sundt 3rd T M. Radial artery harvest: comparison of ultrasonic dissection with standard technique.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  69 113-114
• 14 Chardigny C, Jebara V A, Acar C. et al . Vasoreactivity of the radial artery. Comparison with the internal mammary and gastroepiploic arteries with implications for coronary artery surgery.  Circulation. 1993;  88 115-127
• 15 Royse A G, Royse C F, Shah P. et al . Radial artery harvest technique, use and functional outcome.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;  15 186-193
• 16 Lehtola A, Verkkala K, Jarvinen A. Is electrocautery safe for internal mammary artery mobilisation? A study using scanning electron microscopy.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon. 1989;  37 55-57
• 17 Sudhakar C B, Forman D L, Dewar M L. et al . Free radial artery grafts: Surgical technique and results.  Ann Plast Surg. 1999;  67 876-877
• 18 Ruengsakulrach P, Eizenberg N, Faher C. et al . Surgical implications of variations in hand collateral circulation: Anatomy revisited.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;  122 682-686