Background and Study Aim: As for any manual procedure, the learning curves for medical interventions can have undesirable phases, occurring mostly in the early experience of applying a technique. There have been impressive advances in endoscopic procedures during recent years, and there is an emerging trend that the number of procedures is increasing in parallel with these. In addition, the introduction of screening programs for colorectal cancer will also increase the numbers of procedures needed. Recent developments in medical simulation seem promising with regard to the possibility of “training out” undesirable parts of the learning curve outside the operating room. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of the AccuTouch flexible endoscopy simulator improves the early part of the learning curve in colonoscopy training. Method: 12 endoscopy trainees, 10 surgeons and two medical gastroenterologists, all with experience in gastroscopy but with no specific colonoscopy experience, were randomly assigned to either simulator training or to a control group. They all received the same theoretical study package and the training group practiced with the AccuTouch colonoscopy simulator until a predefined expert level of performance was reached. All trainees performed their first ten individual colonoscopies described in detail in a separate protocol. Results: Trainees in the simulator-trained group performed significantly better (P = 0.0011) and managed to reach the cecum in 52 % of their cases (vs. 19 % in the control group), and were 4.53 times more likely to succeed compared with the controls. Additionally, there was a significantly shorter procedure time and less patient discomfort in the hands of the simulator-trained group. Conclusion: Skills acquired using the AccuTouch simulator transfer well into the clinical colonoscopy environment. The results of this trial clearly support the plan to integrate simulator training into endoscopic education curricula.
References
1
Dafnis G, Granath F, Pahlman L. et al .
The impact of endoscopists’ experience and learning curves and interendoscopist variation on colonoscopy completion rates.
Endoscopy.
2001;
33
511-517
5
Silvis S E, Nebel O, Rogers G. et al .
Endoscopic complications. Results of the 1974 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Survey.
JAMA.
1976;
235
928-930
9
Bowles C JA, Leicester R, Romaya C. et al .
A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?.
Gut.
2004;
53
277-283
12 Kohn L T, Corrigan J M, Donaldson M S (eds). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington DC; Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press 1999
13
Seymour N E, Gallagher A G, Roman S A. et al .
Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study.
Ann Surg.
2002;
236
458-463; discussion 463 - 464
14
Datta V, Mandalia M, Mackay S. et al .
The PreOp flexible sigmoidoscopy trainer. Validation and early evaluation of a virtual reality based system.
Surg Endosc.
2002;
16
1459-1463
16
Sedlack R E, Kolars J C.
Colonoscopy curriculum development and performance-based assessment criteria on a computer-based endoscopy simulator.
Acad Med.
2002;
77
750-751
17
Williams C B, Baillie J, Gillies D F. et al .
Teaching gastrointestinal endoscopy by computer simulation: a prototype for colonoscopy and ERCP.
Gastrointest Endosc.
1990;
36
49-54
23
Neumann M HC, Horbach T. et al .
Score card endoscopy: a multicenter study to evaluate learning curves in 1-week courses using the Erlangen Endo-trainer.
Endoscopy.
2003;
35
515-520
24
Ferlitsch A, Glauninger P, Gupper A. et al .
Evaluation of a virtual endoscopy simulator for training in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
Endoscopy.
2002;
34
698-702
