A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study on the Safety and Tolerability of Transnasal Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Background and Study Aim: Transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with a small-caliber endoscope is well tolerated by patients. However, the effect of this procedure on cardiopulmonary function has not been fully investigated. The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to investigate the effect of transnasal EGD in comparison with transoral EGD on cardiopulmonary function.
Patients and Methods: The study involved 450 patients referred for diagnostic EGD. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three types of unsedated EGD (150 patients per group): transnasal EGD using a small-caliber endoscope (the “XP-N” group), transoral EGD using the same small-caliber endoscope (“XP-O” group), and transoral EGD using a conventional endoscope (“XQ” group). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, and arterial oxygen saturation were monitored before, and 2, 4 and 6 minutes after intubation, and just after endoscope extubation. Gagging episodes were also counted, to determine tolerance.
Results: It was not possible to perform transnasal EGD in 12 patients (8.0 %). A small amount of epistaxis was observed in eight (5.8 %) of 138 patients who were examined successfully by transnasal EGD. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate, rate-pressure product (pulse rate × systolic blood pressure/100), and the drop in arterial oxygen saturation in the XQ group were significantly greater than in the XP-N and XP-O groups at each time point. In the XP-N group, these parameters were significantly lower than those in the XP-O group at 2 minutes after intubation. Of the tree groups the number of gagging episodes was significantly lower in the XP-N group.
Conclusion: Transnasal EGD is safer than transoral EGD as it is associated with fewer adverse effects on cardiopulmonary function and is better tolerated by patients.

References

• 1 Fujita R, Kumura F. Arrhythmia and ischemic changes of the heart induced by gastric endoscopic procedures.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1975;  64 44-48
• 2 Azuma M. Electrocardiographic changes during gastroendoscopy.  Gastroenterol Endosc. 1981;  23 189-201
• 3 Kinoshita Y, Ishido S, Nishiyama K. et al . Arterial oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and pulse rate during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy - influence of sedation and age.  J Clin Gastroenterol. 1991;  13 656-660
• 4 Ishido S, Kinoshita Y, Kitajima N. et al . Fentanyl for sedation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 689-692
• 5 Hashimoto T, Adachi K, Ishimura N. et al . Safety and efficacy of glucagon as a premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy - a comparative study with butyl scopolamine bromide.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2002;  16 111-118
• 6 Froehlich F, Schwizer W, Thorens J. et al . Conscious sedation for gastroscopy: patient tolerance and cardiorespiratory parameters.  Gastroenterology. 1995;  108 697-704
• 7 Bell G D. Review article: premedication and intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1990;  4 103-122
• 8 Shaker R. Unsedated trans-nasal pharyngoesophagogastroduodenoscopy (T-EGD): technique.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 346-348
• 9 Dumortier J, Napoleon B, Hedelius F. et al . Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;  57 198-204
• 10 Craig A, Hanlon J, Dent J. et al . A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 292-296
• 11 Zaman A, Hahn M, Hapke R. et al . A randomized trial of peroral versus transnasal unsedated endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 279-284
• 12 Shaker R, Saeian K. Unsedated transnasal laryngo-esophagogastroduodenoscopy: an alternative to conventional endoscopy.  Am J Med. 2001;  111 (Suppl 8A) 153S-156S
• 13 Preiss C, Charton J P, Schumacher B. et al . A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 641-646
• 14 Christensen M, Achiam M, Trap R. et al . Transnasal gastroscopy.  Dan Med Bull. 2000;  47 218-220
• 15 Robinson B F. Relation of heart rate and systolic blood pressure to the onset of pain in angina pectoris.  Circulation. 1967;  35 1073-1083
• 16 Gobel F L, Norstrom L A, Nelson R R. et al . The rate-pressure product as an index of myocardial oxygen consumption during exercise in patients with angina pectoris.  Circulation. 1978;  57 549-556
• 17 Lavies N G, Creasy T, Harris K. et al . Arterial oxygen saturation during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: influence of sedation and operator experience.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;  83 618-622
• 18 Lieberman D A, Wuerker C K, Katon R M. Cardiopulmonary risk of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation.  Gastroenterology. 1985;  88 468-472
• 19 Quine M A, Bell G D, McCloy R F. et al . Prospective audit of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in two regions of England: safety, staffing, and sedation methods.  Gut. 1995;  36 462-467
• 20 Hart R, Classen M. Complications of diagnostic gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 1990;  22 229-233
• 21 O’Connor K W, Jones S. Oxygen desaturation is common and clinically underappreciated during elective endoscopic procedures.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1990;  36 (3 Suppl) S2-S4
• 22 Scott-Coombes D M, Thompson J N. Hypoxia during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is caused by sedation.  Endoscopy. 1993;  25 308-309
• 23 Levy N, Abinader E. Continuous electrocardiographic monitoring with Holter electrocardiocorder throughout all stages of gastroscopy.  Am J Dig Dis. 1977;  22 1091-1096