Endoscopy 2005; 37(12): 1193-1197
DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-921031
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Biopsy of Colorectal Polyps Is Not Adequate for Grading of Neoplasia

G.  Gondal1 , T.  Grotmol1 , B.  Hofstad2 , M.  Bretthauer1 , T.  J.  Eide3 , G.  Hoff1
  • 1The Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Montebello, Oslo, Norway
  • 2Department of Medicine, Ullevaal Hospital, Oslo, Norway
  • 3Department of Pathology, The Norwegian National Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Further Information

Publication History

Submitted 14 December 2004

Accepted after revision 18 April 2005

Publication Date:
05 December 2005 (online)

Background and Study Aim: Valid tissue sampling of colorectal adenomas is crucial for their management in terms of treatment and follow-up. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of a cold biopsy sample as representative for the whole polypectomy specimen, with regard to histopathological features.
Patients and Methods: As part of the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial, 442 participants (60 % men) who fulfilled the criterion of colonoscopic recovery of adenoma that had been biopsied at flexible sigmoidoscopy, had their adenomas subsequently removed by polypectomy (snare resection) at colonoscopy. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine which variables contributed to the histopathological discrepancy between cold biopsy and polypectomy specimens.
Results: Among the 532 colorectal adenomas biopsied at flexible sigmoidoscopy and removed by colonoscopy, the assessment of intraepithelial neoplasia (dysplasia) status was changed in 51 adenomas (10 %), and 38 (7 %) of them had been underestimated at biopsy compared with polypectomy. Likewise, the assessment of villousness was changed in 45 adenomas (9 %), being upgraded in 26 (6 %) at polypectomy compared with biopsy. In a multivariate model, the diameter of neoplasia at polypectomy was positively associated with increased risk of the underestimation of intraepithelial neoplasia and/or villousness influencing a diagnosis of advanced colorectal neoplasia, when cold biopsy and polypectomy specimens were compared (P trend = 0.01). Among 56 cases of advanced neoplasia, 35 (63 %) showed only low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia on biopsy.
Conclusions: Biopsy-based diagnosis underestimated histopathological diagnosis in about 10 % of colorectal adenomas detected by flexible sigmoidoscopy screening, but advanced neoplasia was underestimated in more than 60 %. Efforts must be made to obtain polypectomy specimens to secure precise diagnosis.

References

  • 1 Pugliese V, Gatteschi B, Aste H. et al . Value of multiple forceps biopsies in assessing the malignant potential of colonic polyps.  Tumori. 1981;  67 57-62
  • 2 Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G S, Sauar J. et al . Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect on the incidence of colorectal cancer.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1999;  34 414-20
  • 3 Bretthauer M, Gondal G, Larsen I K. et al . Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;  37 568-573
  • 4 Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B. et al . The Norwegian colorectal cancer prevention (NORCCAP) screening study. Baseline finding and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50 - 64 years.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2003;  38 635-642
  • 5 Jass J, Sobin L H. Histologic typing of intestinal tumours. Berlin; Springer Verlag 1989
  • 6 Rex D K, Culter C S, Lemmel G T, Rahmani E Y, Clark D W, Helper D J, Lehman G A, Mark D G. Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.  Gastroenterology. 1997;  112 24-28
  • 7 Hixson L J, Fennerty M B, Sampliner R E, Garewal H S. Prospective blinded trail of the colonoscopic miss-rate of large colorectal polyps.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 125-127
  • 8 Rex D K, Alikhan M, Cummings O. et al . Accuracy of pathologic interpretation of colorectal polyps by general pathologists in community practice.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 468-474
  • 9 Costantini M, Sciallero S, Giannini A. et al . Interobserver agreement in the histologic diagnosis of colorectal polyps. The experience of the multicenter adenoma colorectal study (SMAC).  J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;  56 209-214
  • 10 Brown L JR, Smeeton N C, Dixon M F. Assessment of dysplasia in colorectal adenomas: an observer variation and morphometric study.  J Clin Pathol. 1985;  38 174-179
  • 11 Jensen P, Krogsgaard M R, Christiansen J. et al . Observer variability in the assessment of type and dysplasia of colorectal adenomas, analyzed using kappa statistics.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;  38 195-198
  • 12 Fung C HK, Goldman H. The incidence and significance of villous change in adenomatous polyps.  Am J Clin Pathol. 1970;  53 21-25
  • 13 Lane N, Fenoglio C M. Observation on the adenoma as precursor to ordinary large bowel carcinoma.  Gastrointest Radiol. 1976;  1 111-119
  • 14 Silverberg S G. Focally malignant adenomatous polyps of the colon and rectum.  Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1970;  131 103-114

T. Grotmol, M. D., Ph. D.

The Cancer Registry of Norway

Institute of Population-Based Cancer Research · Montebello · N-0310 Oslo · Norway

Fax: +47-22-451370

Email: tom.grotmol@kreftregisteret.no